Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma had reserved her verdict on March 24 after hearing Delhi Police and the respondents for nearly two hours.
The trial court had discharged Imam and others in February 2023. In its order the court had strongly criticised the Delhi Police for its shoddy investigation and had said that Imam and others were merely scapegoats.
Order: The court is not innovating the procedure to be adopted at the stage of framing of charges.
Order: Prima facie the respondents were visible in the video. It is difficult to explain the situation they were violently pushing the barricades and raising slogans against police. They were part of the assembly...
Order: While there is no denial of the right to freedom of expression, this court remains aware of its duty and has tried to decide the issue in that way.
Right to peaceful assembly is subject to restriction. Damage to property and peace is not protected: Order
Court partially reverses the trial court order. Court frames charges against nine of the 11 accused including Imam, Tanha and Zargar under various offences including rioting, unlawful assembly and several other offences.
Mohd Qasim, Mahmood Anwar, Shahzar Raza, Umair Ahmed, Mohd Bilal Nadeem, Sharjeel Imam, Chanda Yadav, Safoora Zargar charged under sections 143, 147, 149, 186, 353, 427 of the IPC as well as sections of the Prevention of Damage to Public Properties act.
Mohd Shoaib and Mohd Abuzar charged with Section 143 of the IPC, discharged from all other sections.
Asif Iqbal Tanha discharged of Sections 308, 323, 341 and 435. Charges framed under other sections.
Court adds that if any evidence comes against the respondents before the trial court related to the offences they have been discharged of, the court can proceed against them as per law.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#SupremeCourt hears a plea on uniform grounds of divorce, inheritance, guardianship, maintenance
SG Tushar Mehta: Uniform Civil Code is desirable. But this is a legislative aspect. Cannot be decided on a writ petition.
CJI DY Chandrachud: In substance petitioner seeks gender neutral and religion neutral laws in divorce, guardianship, inheritance, maintenance.. we have heard Mr Ashwini Upadhyay in person, Sr Adv Huzefa Ahmadi for an intervenor, and SG Mehta for the Union of India.
CJI: SG Mehta submits that as a matter of policy Centre does support UCC but such an intervention in these batch of cases can be only through the parliament. We are not inclined to entertain this under Article 32
The NCLAT will shortly pronounce its judgement on Google's plea challenging the CCI order imposing a penalty of Rs 1337 crores on the tech giant for allegedly misusing its dominant position in the Android ecosystem. #Google#NCLAT#CCI#Android@CCI_India
The judgment will be pronounced by a bench of NCLAT Chairperson Justice Ashok Bhushan and Dr Alok Srivastava, Member (Technical) at 2 PM.
#SupremeCourt hears a case where increasing number of FIRs being registered against Christians with increasing number of arrests without bail
Sr Adv Colin Gonsalves: nodal officers are notified per district and they are not registering a single cases. hate speeches are there in… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
ASG Aishwarya Bhati: it is easy to make sweeping statements..
Gonsalves: please see tehseen poonawalla judgment. nodal officer was to do their job
CJI DY Chandrachud: let MHA file a reply and collation of response by the MHA. We can keep this after two weeks… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Chattisgarh counsel: no notice has been issued on the petition. I can file an additional affidavit and what action have we taken on such instances.
CJI: we can have this case on April 14 and let us have a response from MHA and if in the interim something then we will see… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
#SupremeCourt hears a challenge to the Andhra Pradesh HC order rejecting plea by Ramoji Rao-led Eenadu publication seeking an ex parte ad interim direction to suspend the govt order regarding the subscription of Sakshi newspaper by the village and ward volunteers @eenadulivenews
Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: Sakshi is 176 a month, Eenadu is 207 and the govt is ousting above 200
CJI DY Chandrachud: cannot the person decide which newspaper to purchase..
Rohatgi: these are all govt volunteers and supporters. All those who support the govt will get 200 in which… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Rohatgi: govt has also said that eenadu is yellow journalism and do not go for @Eenadu_Newspapr
Supreme Court to hear plea by Lakshadweep administration challenging Kerala HC order suspending conviction of NCP leader PP Mohd Faizal in attempt to murder case.
Sr Adv AM Singhvi: let me lessen your burden, after I filed a second writ today a notification has been issued that the disqualification has been withdrawn. It has taken them two months. nonetheless it can be disposed off now. then we will go to the SLP