#SupremeCourt to shortly hear a batch of cases highlighting inaction by states in acting against instances of hate speech made against Muslims and Christians #HateSpeech#SupremeCourtOfIndia
Adv Nizam Pasha mentions matter as bench about to rise: In 1 fresh petition notice has not been issued. There is some urgency in that, as I have shown in the news reports annexed. Over 50 rallies, with atleast one hate speech every two days took place in Maharashtra.
Justice BV Nagarathna: if we entertain this then this court will be flooded with contempts. We will have to look into it. We are not on merits but the entailing procedure
SG: If we are serious about this..
Bench discusses
ASG SV Raju: tomorrow is not convenient to me
SG Mehta: i am against hate speech. If we all of are serious about this. Please ask him to collect #hatespeech irrespective of all communities and if he does not do it then his bona fide cannot be trusted. Real test of public… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Justice Nagarathna: we are only listing it
ASG Raju: please don't list this tomorrow..
Justice Joseph: really sorry. It will come up tomorrow only #hatespeech
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#SupremeCourt hears a plea on uniform grounds of divorce, inheritance, guardianship, maintenance
SG Tushar Mehta: Uniform Civil Code is desirable. But this is a legislative aspect. Cannot be decided on a writ petition.
CJI DY Chandrachud: In substance petitioner seeks gender neutral and religion neutral laws in divorce, guardianship, inheritance, maintenance.. we have heard Mr Ashwini Upadhyay in person, Sr Adv Huzefa Ahmadi for an intervenor, and SG Mehta for the Union of India.
CJI: SG Mehta submits that as a matter of policy Centre does support UCC but such an intervention in these batch of cases can be only through the parliament. We are not inclined to entertain this under Article 32
The NCLAT will shortly pronounce its judgement on Google's plea challenging the CCI order imposing a penalty of Rs 1337 crores on the tech giant for allegedly misusing its dominant position in the Android ecosystem. #Google#NCLAT#CCI#Android@CCI_India
The judgment will be pronounced by a bench of NCLAT Chairperson Justice Ashok Bhushan and Dr Alok Srivastava, Member (Technical) at 2 PM.
#SupremeCourt hears a case where increasing number of FIRs being registered against Christians with increasing number of arrests without bail
Sr Adv Colin Gonsalves: nodal officers are notified per district and they are not registering a single cases. hate speeches are there in… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
ASG Aishwarya Bhati: it is easy to make sweeping statements..
Gonsalves: please see tehseen poonawalla judgment. nodal officer was to do their job
CJI DY Chandrachud: let MHA file a reply and collation of response by the MHA. We can keep this after two weeks… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Chattisgarh counsel: no notice has been issued on the petition. I can file an additional affidavit and what action have we taken on such instances.
CJI: we can have this case on April 14 and let us have a response from MHA and if in the interim something then we will see… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
#SupremeCourt hears a challenge to the Andhra Pradesh HC order rejecting plea by Ramoji Rao-led Eenadu publication seeking an ex parte ad interim direction to suspend the govt order regarding the subscription of Sakshi newspaper by the village and ward volunteers @eenadulivenews
Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: Sakshi is 176 a month, Eenadu is 207 and the govt is ousting above 200
CJI DY Chandrachud: cannot the person decide which newspaper to purchase..
Rohatgi: these are all govt volunteers and supporters. All those who support the govt will get 200 in which… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Rohatgi: govt has also said that eenadu is yellow journalism and do not go for @Eenadu_Newspapr
Supreme Court to hear plea by Lakshadweep administration challenging Kerala HC order suspending conviction of NCP leader PP Mohd Faizal in attempt to murder case.
Sr Adv AM Singhvi: let me lessen your burden, after I filed a second writ today a notification has been issued that the disqualification has been withdrawn. It has taken them two months. nonetheless it can be disposed off now. then we will go to the SLP