Rabbi Mike Profile picture
Mar 29 33 tweets 7 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
A timely and emotional thread on where Judaism stands on gun violence and gun control. While I was hesitant to publish this lesson immediately, I was reminded by many that if I had waited...another tragedy would have occurred most likely. So here we go: #thread #gunviolence
As a rabbi, I’ve had the horrible privilege of writing and speaking about the countless mass shootings that have occurred in this country. I wrote after Sandy Hook, after Las Vegas, after Orlando. And here I am again, writing because somehow we have not moved an inch.../1
as the blood of men, women, and children cry out from the ground. In the mid-19th century, Rabbi David Einhorn stood at the pulpit of Har Sinai in Baltimore and gave a sermon on an issue many would have considered a “hot topic” of the time: the topic of slavery. /2
...He stood in front of his congregation, many of whom were slave owners and slavery supporters, and gave a well-researched, emotional sermon about why slavery should be abolished, why it was immoral, and why as Jews we should stand against it. /3
The sermon, as you can probably imagine, received a great deal of negative response: congregants walked out, congregants disagreed, congregants complained. But Rabbi Einhorn remained quiet all week, listening to the words of his congregants, until the next Shabbat.../4
...when he once again stood at the pulpit. That week, he gave a stronger sermon as to why he identified as an abolitionist and why his congregation should as well. He began his sermon with these words: “It seems I was not clear last week.” And what happened? /5
...Congregants walked out, congregants disagreed, congregants complained. A week went by, and the next week, he stood at the pulpit for a third time and said “I apologize for my last two sermons. Apparently I have not been clear,” after which he gave one of the strongest.../6
... Jewish sermons ever recorded against slavery.

Why did Rabbi Einhorn do this? Because he understood the job of a rabbi, and the role of a teacher. The rabbi must be the Jewish authority of a synagogue, pushing the boundaries, and transforming the minds of congregants.../7
...even in the face of adversity. It is up to rabbis around the country to speak out after this week of more gun violence, more death.

The problem of gun violence in our country stems from not only white fragility, toxic masculinity, and fundamentalist beliefs.../8
... of constitutional law, but mostly it stems from the issue of radical individualism in America. This is the basis for the lack of any gun control laws, and the lack of empathy for the grieving parents and siblings of those who have died from gun violence.../9
...But one could also argue (and I do) that radical individualism in America is also responsible for the anti-vax movements, anti-mask, lack of empathetic immigration laws, as well as larger issues of homelessness, racism, and homophobia. Why? /10
Because the radical individualist American thinks: “The public are strangers, they said. What do they do for me? What can I get out of this?” Psychologists and cultural anthropologists have pointed out that this way of thinking is becoming more and more pervasive in society. /11
However, there is nothing LESS Jewish than this individualistic thought. Judaism in itself is, and always has been, a religion or culture of community. One need only glance through our understandings of worship, how we grieve, how we eat, the need for the minyan.../12
..., to understand that we are not meant to do much alone. More than that, the biblical and rabbinic writings have plenty to say about communal responsibility. We are told in Deuteronomy 16:20 not to pursue individual liberty but “Justice, Justice.” /13
Judaism knows nothing of “charity,” the idea of the individual to give from your heart, but rather the concept of “tzedakah,” which obligates each citizen to create and maintain a just and equal society. We are commanded over and over in our Torah not to love ourselves.../14
...but to love our neighbors as ourselves. We see these messages over and over again in the teachings of our sages. Pirkei Avot 2:5 tells us “Do not separate yourself from the community,” meaning that we cannot value our individualism over the values of the community. /15
More clearly, the Talmud Shevuot 39a, tells us that “All Jews are responsible for one another.” And then there’s the Midrash: /16
True, we Jews have always been grateful to the autonomy given to American citizens to build their own destiny, but just as Jews recoil at the anti-vax movement, or those who refuse to even engage in conversations about gun control.../17
..., we recoil at those yelling about constitutional freedom to live (and most likely die) at their choosing. We do so because we still hear the words of our Talmud, Bava Kama 46a, which teaches: /18
In other words, individual freedoms, whether to own a vicious dog, or in this case an unsecured gun, or the purchase of an assault rifle, cease when those freedoms will inflict direct, preventable harm on another. Among those protesting regulations meant to safeguard us all../19
..., we have seen too many signs that read, “My freedom doesn’t end where your fear begins.” No, it doesn’t, but in Judaism, your freedom DOES end when danger to me begins.

Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, a famous social justice rabbi who marched../20
... with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., once said: “In a free society, only some may be guilty, but all are responsible.” And we are all responsible. Isaiah told us to “beat [our] swords into plowshares, And [our] spears into pruning hooks.” /21
...The Psalms told us to “depart from evil, and do good; seek peace and pursue it.” Leviticus 19, in the Hebrew, tells us, Lo Ta’amod Al Dam Rei’echa, has several translations, all relevant, but the most pertinent would be “Do not profit by the blood of your fellow.../22
...and “Do not stand on your neighbors blood.”
But, to borrow one of our favorite gun control words, there is a loophole. Maimonides, in his Mishneh Torah, explains:
/23
The loophole, as the RAMBAM explains, is that if you must own a gun, you are obligated to keep it in a safe, locked and secure in order to not accidentally cause death and bring blood upon your house.
I must note that while the Torah and our Jewish sages may have made.../24
... allowances for weapons, their views on them are clear. The Talmud, Shabbat 63a tells us: /25
Rabbi Eliezer’s opinion is that of the minority, likening weapons as “ornaments;” but the sages disagreed, and the majority opinion was that displaying weapons around on Shabbat in the public domain is “nothing other than reprehensible.” /26
...In other words, there is nothing beautiful about carrying guns, certainly not on Shabbat. They are not ornaments to show or take pride in, but reprehensible parts of society which, as the rabbis hope, will be removed and unnecessary in the future. /27
Finally, the following text from the Bereshit Rabbah (21:13) further idealizes the land free of weapons, "The Rabbis, commenting on the words: 'He placed at the East of the Garden of Eden the Cherubim and the flaming sword' say.../28
...'At the East of the Garden of Eden at the very spot where stood the Cherubim with the flaming sword - there was Gehenna created.'

So, in conclusion, Judaism has always emphasized communal responsibility, felt very strongly about how guns and weapons in general are.../29
...nothing to take pride in, and that the blood of our children cry out from the ground and we are ALL responsible. This goes far beyond the commandment of "thou shalt not murder." It is not the responsibility of the shooters alone, but those who do nothing to prevent it.
END
If you like this thread, you'll love my book:
amazon.com/Lets-Talk-Rabb…
And I teach classes which cost a suggested donation of $1-$20, no one will be turned away. Come and learn!
rabbimichaelharvey.com/events

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rabbi Mike

Rabbi Mike Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RabbiHarvey

Mar 31
Another great question Erik. However, on this one, they are definitely NOT the same tree. Remember that the Genesis 2-3 narrative echos Enuma Elish, and therefore, the goal of the Divine Council (the "we" and "us") is to create servants in humanity.../1
...However, they do NOT wish to allow humanity to be as powerful as they are. So, the Tree of Life is the representative of "immortality" to the gods, which humanity is allowed to have as long as they are controlled and in Eden. Once humanity eats of the other tree.../2
...the tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, and becomes as "wise" and "knowing" as the gods, this is no longer acceptable for them. As the serpent states: "as soon as you eat of it your eyes will be opened and you will be like divine beings who know good and bad.”/3
Read 4 tweets
Mar 31
A wonderful question! Happy to answer via mini #thread. Join us to learn!
The short answer is, YES, you're right on track. But first, Which Bible are you using? I always recommend the Jewish Study Bible. Now, let's get into your great question /1
From a Biblical scholarship point of view, yes you are noticing things that are definitely noticeable! The Deuteronomic school of thought authored the book of D'varim (Deuteronomy) to stand ALONE, not in the canon. It went through the school's important events but.../2
...reimagined and changed from the stories themselves to the "retelling" of stories through 4 speeches by Moses. And while some of the original ideas of the Wilderness Narrative (Exodus-Numbers) certainly made it, we see drastic differences that are purposeful by the D author!/3
Read 6 tweets
Mar 23
Official Statement by the Indiana Board of Rabbis Opposing SB480 and HB1608 #thread

The Indiana General Assembly is presently considering Senate Bill 480, which would make it illegal for physicians or other practitioner from: (1) knowingly providing gender transition…/1 Image
…procedures to an individual who is younger than 18 years of age (minor); and (2) aiding or abetting another physician or practitioner in the provision of gender transition procedures to a minor. We, the undersigned members of The Indiana Board of Rabbis (IBOR) affirm…/2
our sacred Jewish tradition that sees parents as God's partners the creation of each human being. At the same time, we uphold our longstanding tradition that the practice of medicine is a mitzvah, a holy commandment. We would categorically oppose imposing civil or criminal…/3
Read 12 tweets
Mar 17
There was a request for me to do a #thread on the multiple facets of God in the Bible, dismissing the much later inventions that God is Omnipotent, Omniscient, and Omnipresent. These are very new ideas (respectively), so let's get started. #threadstorytime #threadseries
Because Genesis 2/3 is based on Enuma Elish, and contains the ideas of Near Eastern gods (see other threads about this), it makes sense that the god of Genesis 2/3 is not any of the three O's. Genesis 3 shows this well: /1
For one, God is "moving" or walking about in the garden which makes God not omnipresent. More importantly, God asking Adam "Where are You?" This is not a play on words. The God of this chapter literally does not know where Adam is. This God also does not know what occurred/2
Read 17 tweets
Mar 14
Well, a lot of you have been asking about a David/Jonathan thread, about not how they were just lovers but married! @maklelan and @sohelpmejesseca were just talking about it too! Here it goes! #threadseries #thread
So let's get the obvious stuff out of the way. David was bisexual, and he and Jonathan were lovers. The evidence in the text of this is strong. And while some may deny it, those are the same men who scream that Song of Songs is about Israel and God. So let's go through this./1
We read in 1st Samuel 18 that Jonathan's "nefesh" his soul, became "nik'sh'ra" (bound up or binded) with the "nefesh" of David. Soul on soul love. Deep love. This is not friendship. This is soulmates. Moreover, from a Hebrew point of view, the word "nik'sh'ra" is.../2
Read 23 tweets
Mar 11
Well friends, we've been seeing a lot of Christian nonsense about the David/Bat Sheva story and a few of you wonderful followers, especially @_nomadic_soul have been asking for a #thread on the matter, so how can I say no? Sit back, and enjoy this one. #threadsofthreads
As a Jew, and biblical scholar, it is difficult to see how anyone could read this story as a David apologist, but apparently it's out there and I think it's important to understand the biblical author's intentions, and the commentator's reactions, and who they were. /1
These are men who are the authors, men who are the commentators, and men who are the church fathers later looking to make David their hero and unblemished. But let's set the stage: /2
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(