1- A thread on the value of treating #Alzheimer’s disease w/ monoclonal antibodies:
As I read through the recently published appropriate use guidelines for #lecanemab, I am struck by the infrastructure & resources that will be necessary.
2- This table summarizes what medical centers need to safely administer lecanemab to people with Alzheimer’s disease.
Lecanemab is given via IV infusion every two weeks. This requires having an infusion center with the needed capacity & appropriately trained staff.
3- Before treatment begins, you need to make a diagnosis.
You need clinicians skilled at diagnosing mild cognitive impairment & mild dementia.
These are usually neurologists but could be geriatricians or geriatric psychiatrists. There aren’t a ton of folks with this skillset.
4- Because the treatment involves clearing amyloid from the brain, you have to demonstrate the person has amyloid.
This involves either a lumbar puncture or an amyloid PET. Medicare does not cover the latter.
5- The appropriate use guidelines also recommend genotyping because people who are Apo-e4 positive are at higher risk of the complication ARIA.
That in turn requires genetic counseling for the people tested and perhaps for their children.
6- Then there are the MRIs.
Because of the risk of ARIA (either brain edema or microhemorrhages), the person must get an MRI at baseline, several times during the course of treatment, and whenever they have symptoms that could be ARIA.
7- You also need radiologists trained to detect & grade ARIA.
You also need emergency room clinicians & neurologists who can diagnosis & manage ARIA.
8- I am just not sure this is all worth it.
Alzheimer’s is a devastating disease but lecanemab has only very modest benefit in slowing the decline. We don’t expect improvement in memory or functioning.
We certainly need effective treatments, but I don’t think this is the way.
9- Finally, imagine using all the money that will be required for antibody treatments instead for community resources for older adults, caregiver supports, & interventions for behavioral & psychological symptoms of dementia.
That would be a great investment.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“Yes, Americans eat more calories and lack universal access to health care. But there's also higher child poverty, racial segregation, social isolation, and more. Even the way cities are designed makes access to good food more difficult.”
Interestingly, the US “has higher rates of cancer screening and survival, better control of blood pressure and cholesterol levels, lower stroke mortality, lower rates of current smoking, and higher average household income.”
But it’s not enough to offset the many other factors.
We are honored to welcome Dr. Holly Swartz, Prof of Psychiatry at @PittPsychiatry & Editor-in-Chief of American Journal of Psychotherapy (@APA_Publishing) to @uwsmph@UWHealth Psychiatry Grand Rounds to discuss:
"Psychosocial Interventions for #Bipolar Disorder"
Network meta-analysis indicated that psychotherapy, including CBT, family focused therapy, and interpersonal & social rhythm therapy (IPSRT), are effective interventions for bipolar depression and for prevention of recurrence of bipolar disorder.
Core strategies of bipolar-specific psychotherapies (cognitive therapy, family therapy, interpersonal & social rhythm therapy, psychoeducation & integrated care management):
1- My current take on whether anti-amyloid therapies are likely to have meaningful impact on cognition, functioning & quality of life of people living w/ #dementia due to #Alzheimers disease:
Not likely.
For details, based on my recent Grand Rounds at Penn St, read on.
2- History:
After finding that active immunization with Abeta42 in mice that overexpressed APP resulted in virtual elimination of amyloid deposits, there was great enthusiasm for anti-amyloid therapies - and for the amyloid hypothesis.
@LonSchneiderMD 2- Note that the assn. between amyloid reduction & cognition goes in opposite directions in the 2 studies:
"High dose aducanumab was about as cognitively impairing in ENGAGE as it was beneficial in EMERGE [despite] both trials showing similar, substantial reductions in plaque."
3- It's also possible that the slight cognitive improvement found with high-dose aducanumab in EMERGE was due in part to the greater worsening of cognition in the placebo group of EMERGE compared with the placebo group of ENGAGE.