Bombay High Court is hearing a PIL against permission granted to MMRCL to cut 177 trees at Aarey Colony for the Metro project by "fraudulently claiming the trees are dead and dangerous."
Sr Adv Milind Sathe for the Tree Authority said that SC's permission would be applicable to the area required for the metro work. Not the specific no. of trees.
Sr Adv Milind Sathe points out earlier orders of the SC wherein an assurance was given that only the trees that are required for the car shed work would be cut.
HC - The status quo order on felling of trees was relaxed to the extent of feeling 84 trees.
Sr Adv Sathe on the point the trees are dead and dangerous.
There is not one word in the petition or in the objections to the public notice about the trees being dead and dangerous. All this is only being said in the argument.
Sr Adv Kumbhakoni - If permission is not granted to shave these remaining trees the entire project will be a non-starter. What is remaining is only 5% trees to be cut... After giving permission for cutting over 2k trees..
ACJ -The apex court by way of an interim order allowed you to appraoch the tree authority for 84 trees.. it will be for you to approach the SC... Today the Apex court says permission is for 84 trees. We understand your argument.
From the sub. is appears that pursuant to the permission granted by the Apex court on Nov 29, 2022 in suo Motu writ, the R1 approached R2 seeking to fell the trees for its Metro Project at Aarey. The trees are to be felled for clearance of the shunting net area.
Order
The pet.'s claim that permission was sought from the apex court to fell 84 trees.
R2 claimed that there were many shrubs that had grown and application was made in Jan 2023 to fell 177 trees.
Permission was granted by R1 tree authority was to fell 177 trees.
The petitioner contends that the public notice issued by the tree authority before granting permission claimed that the trees were dead and dangerous ... which was misleading.
Tree Authority says that even though the title of the public notice said dead and dangerous trees the content shows the trees were not dead and dangerous.
In light of that it will not be possible for this court to pass further orders permitting the R2 (MMRCL) to cut trees beyond 84. The Apex Court is seized with the matter and it is kept on April 11.
ACJ inaudible... And seek permission from the Apex Court
ACJ - Now according to him (MMRCL) also till all the trees are cut the project cannot move forward... WE HAVE NOT Granted Permission for Anything. We have said the Apex Court should clarify.
Additional Sessions Judge Pulastya Pramachala of Karkardooma Courts framed charges of rioting and unlawful assembly against Ankit, Sourabh Sharma, Rohit, Rahul Kumar and Sachin.
Court: Same mob was also seen by him vandalising this mosque and setting it on fire next morning on 25.02.2020 at about 11 AM. The accused persons were identified to be the member of both these mobs by Ali Ahmad.
#JustIN | A defamation case has been filed in the Haridwar Court against Congress Leader Rahul Gandhi over his alleged remark calling the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) as the "Kauravas of the 21st century."
In his alleged statement, referring to the RSS, he had said: "Kauravas of the 21st century wear Khakhi half-pants and run shakhas. Besides them stand two to three richest people of the country"
"Concept of marriage is more than just the socio-legal recognition of a union of “any two persons” and that its recognition is on the basis of established societal norms which cannot keep changing on the basis of variable notions based upon newly developed value system".
"We have numerous statutory provisions ensuring marriages between opposite sexes with related consequential legal provisions with various rights related to inheritance, succession, and, tax liabilities stemming from marriage".
“Manish Sisodia Played Vital Role Behind Delhi Liquor Policy Scam, Payment Of
Advance Kickbacks Of Around Rs. 90-100 crores Was Meant For Him”: Delhi Court while denying bail to former Deputy CM.
In the bail order running into 34 pages, Special judge MK Nagpal has said that evidence not only shows Sisodia’s active participation in the criminal conspiracy, but also the prima facie commission of some substantive offences of the PC Act by him.
Court: There is also nothing apparent on record to infer or show that arrest was illegal or violative of any directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court or Hon'ble High Courts and rather, the material placed before this court by the CBI justifies the arrest of applicant in the case.
Bombay High Court is hearing slain rationalist NARENDRA DABHOLKAR 's family's plea to continue monitoring the investigation and trial in the 2013 incident.
‘Misuse’ of CM Disaster Relief Fund: #Kerala Lok Ayukta Refers Complaint Against Chief Minister @pinarayivijayan, Others To Full Bench After Difference Of Opinion
@pinarayivijayan@navya_benny The bench of Justice Cyriac Joseph and Justice Harun-ul-Rashid had difference of opinion over the basic issue that whether the action of the respondents can be subjected to investigation under Kerala Lok Ayukta Act, and on the merits of allegations.
@pinarayivijayan@navya_benny Under Section 7 (1) of the Kerala Lok Ayukta Act, where there is difference of opinion between the Lok Ayukta and the Upa-Lok Ayukta, the action shall be investigated by the Lok Ayukta and both the Upa-Lok Ayuktas together and the decision of the majority shall prevail.