Live Law Profile picture
Mar 31 31 tweets 16 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Bombay High Court is hearing a PIL against permission granted to MMRCL to cut 177 trees at Aarey Colony for the Metro project by "fraudulently claiming the trees are dead and dangerous."

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Hearing before the bench of Acting CJ SV Gangapurwala and Sandeep Marne

During the morning sessions Senior Advocate Venkatesh Dhond for petitioner Zoru Bhathena made the following submissions.

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Dhond -

On Nov 29 SC permitted MMRCL to approach the tree authority for felling of 84 trees.

MMRCL makes a supplementary application for cutting additional 93 trees.

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Dhond

Subsequently public notice is issued saying permission is required for removal of dead and dangerous trees.

"They do this because under the Act if the tree is dead and dangerous permission will not be refused."

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Dhond

They fraudulently claimed the trees were dead or dangerous.

He says that in an earlier petition before the HC, they claimed that the additional trees that needed to be cut were shrubs that had grown.

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Sr Adv Milind Sathe for the Tree Authority said that SC's permission would be applicable to the area required for the metro work. Not the specific no. of trees.

#Aarey #BombayHC
Sr. Adv Venkatesh Dhond's arguments continue.

He says that on Nov 29, 2022 permission was specifically for cutting 84 trees not more.

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Sr Adv Milind Sathe points out earlier orders of the SC wherein an assurance was given that only the trees that are required for the car shed work would be cut.

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Sathe - The application to the SC was for construction of the RAMP and everything that has to be done for its construction has to be considered.

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
HC - The status quo order on felling of trees was relaxed to the extent of feeling 84 trees.
Sr Adv Sathe on the point the trees are dead and dangerous.

There is not one word in the petition or in the objections to the public notice about the trees being dead and dangerous. All this is only being said in the argument.

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Sr. Adv Ashutosh Kumbhakoni submits a map.

"Permission has already been granted to CLEAN SHAVE the green and yellow portion."

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Sr Adv Kumbhakoni - If permission is not granted to shave these remaining trees the entire project will be a non-starter. What is remaining is only 5% trees to be cut... After giving permission for cutting over 2k trees..

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Sr Adv Kumbhakoni - Reads portions of the SC order that public investment in the project cannot be taken for granted.

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Sr Adv Kumbhakoni states that no. of trees allowed to be cut by the SC was only incidental and not decisional

ACJ - So get the clarification from the SC.

Kumbhakoni - The order is CRySTAL CLEAR according to us.

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
ACJ -The apex court by way of an interim order allowed you to appraoch the tree authority for 84 trees.. it will be for you to approach the SC... Today the Apex court says permission is for 84 trees. We understand your argument.

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
J Marne - Can we say that the SC meant that even the 85th & 86th tree can be cut?

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Order

The present pet. is filed against the order of the tree authority permitting the MMRCL to cut 178 trees on March 15 , 2023.

#Aarey #BombayHC
Order

From the sub. is appears that pursuant to the permission granted by the Apex court on Nov 29, 2022 in suo Motu writ, the R1 approached R2 seeking to fell the trees for its Metro Project at Aarey. The trees are to be felled for clearance of the shunting net area.
Order

The pet.'s claim that permission was sought from the apex court to fell 84 trees.

R2 claimed that there were many shrubs that had grown and application was made in Jan 2023 to fell 177 trees.

#Aarey #BombayHC
Order

Permission was granted by R1 tree authority was to fell 177 trees.

The petitioner contends that the public notice issued by the tree authority before granting permission claimed that the trees were dead and dangerous ... which was misleading.

#Aarey #BombayHC
Order

Tree Authority says that even though the title of the public notice said dead and dangerous trees the content shows the trees were not dead and dangerous.

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Order

There is no doubt the metro project involves public interest and public purpose. Balance has to be struck betn sustainable development and ecology.

The Hon'ble Apex Court is seized with the matter. We may reproduce para 22 & 23 of the Nov 29, 2022 order.
Order

In the order the Apex Court has clearly observed...felling to the extent of 84 trees. Regarding 84 trees Apex court has granted permission.

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Order

However the impugned permission is for 177 trees which is beyond 84 trees.

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Order

In light of that it will not be possible for this court to pass further orders permitting the R2 (MMRCL) to cut trees beyond 84. The Apex Court is seized with the matter and it is kept on April 11.

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Order

In light of that R2 may not proceed to fell the trees under the impuned permission beyond 84.

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Sr Adv Venkatesh Dhond says he will take out an IA because the SC hasn't granted any permission it has only asked them to approach the tree authority

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Dhond - Let me make my submission

ACJ - It will be a waste of time. SC has already granted permission

Sr Adv Dhond - The SC has only granted them permission to approach Tree Authority. That permission is....I haven't made submissions...

#Aarey #BombayHC
Sr Adv Dhond - Ill agitate everything before the SC but these 84 trees will go. There is very little regard for the fact that these are trees.

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
ACJ inaudible... And seek permission from the Apex Court

ACJ - Now according to him (MMRCL) also till all the trees are cut the project cannot move forward... WE HAVE NOT Granted Permission for Anything. We have said the Apex Court should clarify.

#Aarey #BombayHC

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Live Law

Live Law Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LiveLawIndia

Apr 1
#DelhiRiots

Court frames charges against Ankit and 4 other men for allegedly setting on fire a mosque (Allah wali Masjid) during the 2020 #riots.

The FIR alleged that articles like Quran, carpet, doors, cctv etc were also set on fire.

#Rioting #UnlawfulAssembly Image
Additional Sessions Judge Pulastya Pramachala of Karkardooma Courts framed charges of rioting and unlawful assembly against Ankit, Sourabh Sharma, Rohit, Rahul Kumar and Sachin.

#DelhiRiots #DelhiCourt
Court: Same mob was also seen by him vandalising this mosque and setting it on fire next morning on 25.02.2020 at about 11 AM. The accused persons were identified to be the member of both these mobs by Ali Ahmad.

#DelhiRiots
Read 8 tweets
Apr 1
#JustIN | A defamation case has been filed in the Haridwar Court against Congress Leader Rahul Gandhi over his alleged remark calling the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) as the "Kauravas of the 21st century."

#Defamation
#DefamationCase Image
The criminal defamation complaint has been filed by an RSS worker Kamal Bhadauria. The Court is set the hear the case on April 12.

The alleged comment was made by Gandhi during the #BharatJodoYatra in Haryana.

#DefamationCase
#Defamation
#RahulGandhi
In his alleged statement, referring to the RSS, he had said: "Kauravas of the 21st century wear Khakhi half-pants and run shakhas. Besides them stand two to three richest people of the country"

#DefamationCase #Defamation #RahulGandhi #RSS
Read 4 tweets
Apr 1
"Marriage Of Opposite Sexes Central To Indian Legal Regime": Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind Opposes Pleas In SC Seeking Recognition For Same-Sex Marriages @padmaaa_shr #Same-SexMarriage #SameSexCouples #SupremeCourt #SupremeCourt2023 livelaw.in/top-stories/su…
"Concept of marriage is more than just the socio-legal recognition of a union of “any two persons” and that its recognition is on the basis of established societal norms which cannot keep changing on the basis of variable notions based upon newly developed value system".
"We have numerous statutory provisions ensuring marriages between opposite sexes with related consequential legal provisions with various rights related to inheritance, succession, and, tax liabilities stemming from marriage".
Read 5 tweets
Mar 31
#BREAKING

“Manish Sisodia Played Vital Role Behind Delhi Liquor Policy Scam, Payment Of
Advance Kickbacks Of Around Rs. 90-100 crores Was Meant For Him”: Delhi Court while denying bail to former Deputy CM.

#ManishSisodia
In the bail order running into 34 pages, Special judge MK Nagpal has said that evidence not only shows Sisodia’s active participation in the criminal conspiracy, but also the prima facie commission of some substantive offences of the PC Act by him.

#ManishSisodia #DelhiCourt
Court: There is also nothing apparent on record to infer or show that arrest was illegal or violative of any directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court or Hon'ble High Courts and rather, the material placed before this court by the CBI justifies the arrest of applicant in the case.
Read 15 tweets
Mar 31
Bombay High Court is hearing slain rationalist NARENDRA DABHOLKAR 's family's plea to continue monitoring the investigation and trial in the 2013 incident.

#BombayHighCourt #NarendraDabholkar
Adv Abhay Nevagi for the Dabholkar family

Advs Subhash Jadhav and Ghanshyam Upadhyay for accused Vikram Bhave and Sharad Kalaskar

#NarendraDabholkar #BombayHC
HC to accused - As far as monitoring is concerned, you may not have any legal right to oppose.

#NarendraDabholkar #BombayHC
Read 22 tweets
Mar 31
‘Misuse’ of CM Disaster Relief Fund: #Kerala Lok Ayukta Refers Complaint Against Chief Minister @pinarayivijayan, Others To Full Bench After Difference Of Opinion

@navya_benny

livelaw.in/news-updates/l…
@pinarayivijayan @navya_benny The bench of Justice Cyriac Joseph and Justice Harun-ul-Rashid had difference of opinion over the basic issue that whether the action of the respondents can be subjected to investigation under Kerala Lok Ayukta Act, and on the merits of allegations.
@pinarayivijayan @navya_benny Under Section 7 (1) of the Kerala Lok Ayukta Act, where there is difference of opinion between the Lok Ayukta and the Upa-Lok Ayukta, the action shall be investigated by the Lok Ayukta and both the Upa-Lok Ayuktas together and the decision of the majority shall prevail.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(