Live Law Profile picture
Apr 1 8 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
#DelhiRiots

Court frames charges against Ankit and 4 other men for allegedly setting on fire a mosque (Allah wali Masjid) during the 2020 #riots.

The FIR alleged that articles like Quran, carpet, doors, cctv etc were also set on fire.

#Rioting #UnlawfulAssembly
Additional Sessions Judge Pulastya Pramachala of Karkardooma Courts framed charges of rioting and unlawful assembly against Ankit, Sourabh Sharma, Rohit, Rahul Kumar and Sachin.

#DelhiRiots #DelhiCourt
Court: Same mob was also seen by him vandalising this mosque and setting it on fire next morning on 25.02.2020 at about 11 AM. The accused persons were identified to be the member of both these mobs by Ali Ahmad.

#DelhiRiots
Court: It has also come in statement of witness that Rohit was instigating other members of mob, to set mosque and other houses of muslims in gali on fire and that accused Saurabh was setting mosque on fire, while Ankit was taking out articles from the mosque damaging the same.
“In respect of accused Rahul and Sachin also, it has come in the statement of witness that on 25.02.2020 they were taking articles of mosque outside in the gali and destroying the same,” court said.

#DelhiRiots
Court: Same mob was also seen by him vandalising this mosque and setting it on fire next morning on 25.02.2020 at about 11 AM.

#DelhiRiots #DelhiCourt
Court has framed charges against the five accused under sections 147,148, 427, 435, 436, 450, 149 and 188 of Indian Penal Code.

#DelhiRiots #DelhiCourt
The FIR was registered on the basis of complaint from one Mohd. Imran alleging that the Allah wali Masjid situated at Shahid Bhagat Singh Colony was set on fire during riots. It was further alleged that a sculpture had also been put on slab outside the door of the Masjid.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Live Law

Live Law Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LiveLawIndia

Apr 1
#JustIN | A defamation case has been filed in the Haridwar Court against Congress Leader Rahul Gandhi over his alleged remark calling the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) as the "Kauravas of the 21st century."

#Defamation
#DefamationCase
The criminal defamation complaint has been filed by an RSS worker Kamal Bhadauria. The Court is set the hear the case on April 12.

The alleged comment was made by Gandhi during the #BharatJodoYatra in Haryana.

#DefamationCase
#Defamation
#RahulGandhi
In his alleged statement, referring to the RSS, he had said: "Kauravas of the 21st century wear Khakhi half-pants and run shakhas. Besides them stand two to three richest people of the country"

#DefamationCase #Defamation #RahulGandhi #RSS
Read 4 tweets
Apr 1
"Marriage Of Opposite Sexes Central To Indian Legal Regime": Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind Opposes Pleas In SC Seeking Recognition For Same-Sex Marriages @padmaaa_shr #Same-SexMarriage #SameSexCouples #SupremeCourt #SupremeCourt2023 livelaw.in/top-stories/su…
"Concept of marriage is more than just the socio-legal recognition of a union of “any two persons” and that its recognition is on the basis of established societal norms which cannot keep changing on the basis of variable notions based upon newly developed value system".
"We have numerous statutory provisions ensuring marriages between opposite sexes with related consequential legal provisions with various rights related to inheritance, succession, and, tax liabilities stemming from marriage".
Read 5 tweets
Mar 31
#BREAKING

“Manish Sisodia Played Vital Role Behind Delhi Liquor Policy Scam, Payment Of
Advance Kickbacks Of Around Rs. 90-100 crores Was Meant For Him”: Delhi Court while denying bail to former Deputy CM.

#ManishSisodia
In the bail order running into 34 pages, Special judge MK Nagpal has said that evidence not only shows Sisodia’s active participation in the criminal conspiracy, but also the prima facie commission of some substantive offences of the PC Act by him.

#ManishSisodia #DelhiCourt
Court: There is also nothing apparent on record to infer or show that arrest was illegal or violative of any directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court or Hon'ble High Courts and rather, the material placed before this court by the CBI justifies the arrest of applicant in the case.
Read 15 tweets
Mar 31
Bombay High Court is hearing slain rationalist NARENDRA DABHOLKAR 's family's plea to continue monitoring the investigation and trial in the 2013 incident.

#BombayHighCourt #NarendraDabholkar
Adv Abhay Nevagi for the Dabholkar family

Advs Subhash Jadhav and Ghanshyam Upadhyay for accused Vikram Bhave and Sharad Kalaskar

#NarendraDabholkar #BombayHC
HC to accused - As far as monitoring is concerned, you may not have any legal right to oppose.

#NarendraDabholkar #BombayHC
Read 22 tweets
Mar 31
Bombay High Court is hearing a PIL against permission granted to MMRCL to cut 177 trees at Aarey Colony for the Metro project by "fraudulently claiming the trees are dead and dangerous."

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Hearing before the bench of Acting CJ SV Gangapurwala and Sandeep Marne

During the morning sessions Senior Advocate Venkatesh Dhond for petitioner Zoru Bhathena made the following submissions.

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Dhond -

On Nov 29 SC permitted MMRCL to approach the tree authority for felling of 84 trees.

MMRCL makes a supplementary application for cutting additional 93 trees.

#Aarey #BombayHighCourt
Read 31 tweets
Mar 31
‘Misuse’ of CM Disaster Relief Fund: #Kerala Lok Ayukta Refers Complaint Against Chief Minister @pinarayivijayan, Others To Full Bench After Difference Of Opinion

@navya_benny

livelaw.in/news-updates/l…
@pinarayivijayan @navya_benny The bench of Justice Cyriac Joseph and Justice Harun-ul-Rashid had difference of opinion over the basic issue that whether the action of the respondents can be subjected to investigation under Kerala Lok Ayukta Act, and on the merits of allegations.
@pinarayivijayan @navya_benny Under Section 7 (1) of the Kerala Lok Ayukta Act, where there is difference of opinion between the Lok Ayukta and the Upa-Lok Ayukta, the action shall be investigated by the Lok Ayukta and both the Upa-Lok Ayuktas together and the decision of the majority shall prevail.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(