I was invited to give a talk at Fiocruz. The event takes place in Rio de Janeiro, starting at 12:30 EDT / 5:30 pm CEST and, and will be broadcast via Zoom.
Still working on the presentation (also, my luggage did not make it... thanks airfrance), but this will be the approximate outline of the talk:
There will be a Q&A and discussion following up; and one gets a chance to see me being uncomfortable being the one interviewed rather than the other way around. 😅
Please join via zoom on Monday if you are interested.
Uhh I think time is 17:30 GMT and 18:30 CEST
So the talk was recorded, and it will become available to watch for everybody... I will keep posting here in this thread when I have more information.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How much should we think about the role of information in society?
In this article, I use the recent media coverage surrounding #lableak versus #zoonosis to point toward a new threat we have not yet wrapped our heads around:
🚨🚨🚨 NEW EVIDENCE #zoonosis
Chinese researchers (who have had troubles getting data out) finally managed to sneak upload full #sequencing data from environmental swaps at Huanan market.
Show: Co-occurance of #animal sequences with SARS-CoV-2 RNA
Added to the evidence map 🔽
@KatherineJWu 's atlantic article first reported on this new development.
(independent reseachers have been waiting on these data to come out for over a year)
1⃣ Does this prove that SARS-CoV-2 came from racoon dogs?
Not definitively. Co-occurance of sequences could be from chance contamination in theory. Also, even if racoon dogs were indeed infected, they might just have been amplifiers at market, not the original source.
Environmental swaps were taken from the Huanan market, and that many of them tested positive was already confirmed a year ago in a pre-print from researchers at the Chinese CDC.
However, they did not make their sequencing data available and...
@KatherineJWu ...thus had trouble getting their pre-print accepted.
It now appears that in order to get the paper published (speculation!), one of the researchers uploaded the sequences, and voila, they contained exactly what people like @edwardcholmes@MichaelWorobey expected; animal DNA/RNA
The incompetence US media machine is scary.
There is nothing in this article but speculation, started again by some republican stuffer document drop, no evidence of wrongdoing, but careful phrasing to obfuscate. "Somebody said they maybe found evidence of potential doublebilling"
When exactly became it okay to just run with made up stories? Just because two completely different projects sometimes require spending on similar lab gear, materials or training does not mean anything was double billed. That's just ignorance about scientific work, everything...
looks like a wash for amateurs who fundamentally do not understand what goes into a research project.
It is scary how predictable these false sensationalist media stories are. It is literally #2 down here ⬇️
It is time to stop being naive about online discourse.
“The discourse holds so many traps for the unwary. It’s a bit like financial scams and gambling that are a tax on the financially naïve. A similar tax is being levied on the intellectually naïve.” — @ArthurCDent
1/
@ArthurCDent In the article, I lay out 6 common #manipulation tactics and why they work to sabotage discourse on scientific topics.
First up is "just asking questions" or "#sealioning", which uses social expectations and #framing effects to distort conversations.