A refreshingly candid political analysis. But who is it by?
"The destructive legacy of Thatcherism is typically analysed through an economic lens, namely that free-market dogmatism rewarded corporate greed at the expense of our public services."
"Less focus is paid to another kind of war she had to wage to win this economic battle; by curtailing the rights of trade unionists, disempowering local governments and handing over public resources to unaccountable private companies, Thatcher was waging a war on democracy."
"40 years later, the Conservative government’s anti-democratic assault rages on. The Minimum Service Levels Bill overrides our fundamental right to strike."
"The Public Order Bill curtails our right to protest. And new voter ID laws will effectively deny millions of people the ability to exercise their right to vote. Across the board, our democracy is under attack."
"However, if the government’s recent theft of our democratic rights is cause for concern, so too is recent behaviour of the @UKLabour leadership, which casts serious doubt over their willingness to win these rights back."
(Last week, @UKLabour’s National Executive Committee passed a motion – proposed by Keir Starmer – to bar Jeremy Corbyn from standing as a Labour candidate in Islington North).
"This was a flagrant denial of natural justice, and a shameful attack on the democratic rights of Islington North @UKLabour Party members. It is up to them – not party leaders – to decide who their candidate should be."
"At a time when the government is attacking our rights to strike, protest and vote, the @UKLabour leadership should be defending democracy. Instead, it is debasing it."
"Ultimately, only a democratic movement rooted in its local communities can generate the bold solutions needed to tackle the crises facing us all. It is no coincidence that the NEC’s anti-democratic motion took aim at our political campaign between 2015 and 2019."
Blocking Corbyn's candidacy is "an insult to the millions of people who voted for our Party in 2017 & 2019, & to all those who voted for his leadership on the basis that he would “defend [the] radical values” we put forward."
FYI @UKLabour achieved 40% of the vote share in 2019.
"Keir Starmer has abandoned his pledges to defend trade unions, bring key industries into public ownership, reverse #NHS privatisation, raise corporation tax, protect free movement & abolish tuition fees."
"#Solidarity is now saved for CEOs, not striking workers. Trust is placed in corporate interests, not party members. Human rights issues are cherry picked at the expense of a consistently ethical foreign policy."
"And empathy for desperate refugees is eschewed to appease the right-wing press.
As the government plunges millions into hardship, Keir Starmer has decided to attack the democratic foundations of his own party and the principles he once proclaimed to support."
"There is huge demand for a more hopeful alternative: decent pay rises, democratic public ownership, housing for all, a wealth tax to save our #NHS, and a humane immigration system grounded in dignity, empathy and care."
"Those who continue to campaign for these transformative policies – and against the NEC’s assault on democracy – show great courage. Indeed, they have sent a message to all those who have been hesitant to fight back."
"Ultimately, if the @UKLabour leadership is happy to denigrate its own party’s internal democracy, how will it treat democracy more broadly if it is given the chance to govern?"
"One thing’s for sure: the @UKLabour leadership will not be able to defend democracy in society if it cannot even respect it in its own movement."
So I'm assuming you've already guessed the author of this candid political polemic...
Regardless of what you think of Starmer or Corbyn, almost everyone now wants an end Tory misrule, but given our antiquated FPTP electoral system, the ONLY REALISTIC way of achieving this is through most people voting @UKLabour at the next general election. islingtontribune.co.uk/article/jeremy…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Speakers at The Conservative Nationalism Conference (NatCon, London, 13-15 May), include: Braverman; Rees-Mogg; Gove; Emma Webb; Danny Kruger; David Frost; John Hayes; Calvin Robinson; Toby Young; Keven Roberts, president of the free-market Heritage Foundation, & more.
You may not be aware of Tory MP Danny Kruger - perhaps better known as Prue Leith's hard-right son - but the malign extremist ideology & influence of this "evangelical Christian" should not be underestimated.
While the sponsors list for London 2023 has yet to be released, the main sponsors of previous events have included Republican billionaire 'libertarian' mega donor Peter Thiel, owner of big data and surveillance company Palantir.
#Britain is becoming a brutal, regressive, intolerant, hard-right, antidemocratic, authoritarian state, run by Christo-xenophobic nationalists, who represent powerful corporate interests. Their cheerleaders meet in London in May.
What's their strategy & ultimate goal?
In London, from 13 -15 May, every swivel-eyed hard-right reality-denying divisive free-market culture-war-fuelling Christo-nationalist authoritarian individual & organisation you've ever heard of gather for The Conservative Nationalism Conference, NatCon.
The attendees read like a 'who's who' of every awful individual & organisation I've written a thread about over the last decade, & it's awash with representatives from every dangerous free-market 'think tank', from the Heritage Foundation to the #TuftonStreet lobbyists.
The concept & use of the term 'grooming' first emerged in relation to child sexual abuse in late 1970s USA, with growing recognition of child sexual abuse & exploitation perpetrated by 'extrafamilial' acquaintances.
The word 'grooming' has been around for a long time, applied to a wide variety of human behaviours & activities.
But in the context of child sexual abuse, the term generally refers to specific techniques used by some child abusers to gain access to & control over their victims.
The techniques a child sex abuser employs are mostly influenced by the relationship between the offender & the victim.
Although 'acquaintance child sex abusers' are sometimes violent, to avoid discovery, they tend to control their victims primarily through the grooming process.
On 3rd of February, 2021, MPs debated ill-defined so-called "Grooming Gangs" in Parliament.
MP Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi warned of the dangers of spreading falsehoods which are "exploited by the far-right to create racist divisions in our society, perpetuating myths & stereotypes".
Braverman’s claims about “grooming gangs” go beyond dog whistles & into overt racism. She asserts perpetrators are “almost all British-Pakistani” & reduces victims to “overwhelmingly white girls from disadvantaged or troubled backgrounds”, contradicting Home Office findings.
A 2020 Home Office report concluded such “group-based CSE (child sexual exploitation) offenders are most commonly white”, while victims come from many backgrounds, & include boys. It found no reliable, generalisable evidence of ethnic disproportionality.
Far-right activist James Allchurch, described as a supporter of Adolf Hitler, has been found guilty on ten counts of distributing audio material to stir up racial hatred over a two-year period through a “highly racist & antisemitic” podcast station called 'Radio Aryan'.
But where would anyone in Britain get the impression that it's OK to stir up racial hatred or use antisemitic tropes & conspiracy theories? Surely no-one in the media or public eye - nor God-forbid anyone in Government - would fuel racism or antisemitism?
The jury heard how the charges relate to audio files uploaded between 17 May 2019 & 18 March 2021 to a public website called Radio Aryan, later renamed Radio Albion: the content of the episodes is said to be “highly racist & antisemitic”, & “white supremacist in nature”.
Two Govt Ministers & the @Conservatives' latest LYING PM, Rishi Sunak, MISLED parliament by LYING to MPs & the British people about the backlog of asylum claims - they implied the backlog in 2010 when @UKLabour left Govt was 260,000. It was was 19,000.🤥
In a statement to the House of Commons in December, Rishi Sunak LIED when he claimed that the asylum backlog – 132,000 cases at the time – was half the size of the backlog left by the departing Labour Govt in 2010, implying the backlog in 2010 would have been about 260,000.
Also in December, the LYING immigration minister, Robert Jenrick, and the LYING safeguarding minister, Sarah Dines, LIED when they told MPs that 450,000 and 500,000 legacy cases had been left by the @UKLabour Govt.
Johnson shamelessly normalised LYING, & now they're all at it.