April 6th, 2023: @Twitter has been randomly shutting down API access for many apps and sadly we were affected today too. Hopefully we will be restored soon! We appreciate your patience until then.
The trial court had rejected his bail plea on November 17, 2022. Jain challenged the order before the High Court on December 1, 2022.
Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma had reserved his verdict on the bail plea on March 22.
He heard the arguments in the case for over a month.
Justice Sharma will also pronounce his verdict on the bail applications of co-accused Vaibhav Jain and Ankush Jain.
Court master informs that the court will assemble at 11 am.
Judge presides.
Satyendar Jain order: The simple fact is the CBI has filed a case of disproportionate assets. The present court cannot go into validity of these proceedings. Facts show that certain DA were masked. The court has to see the prima facie case.
Order: Person is influential. The petitioner cannot be held to have cleared the twin conditions under PmLA.
Order: The broad probabilities indicate that the companies associated to him are controlled and managed by him.
Order: Learned special judge does not have any perversity. Order Is well reasoned.
Order: He is not entitled to bail. Hence the application is dismissed.
Court also denies bail to co-accused Vaibhav and Ankush Jain.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: These are four officers. Two of them were district Judges who left their posts.. It is very clear that we will retire according to rules then prevailing when we applied in 2016
Rohatgi: When they were appointed in 2018 there tenure will be 5 years or 62 whichever is earlier- this is completely illegal and violative of earlier judgments
Lawyer: My son was stripped naked and tied to teacher and then he was videographed and the pictures were distributed among villagers
CJI DY Chandrachud: The trial judge granted bail to the accused
Lawyer: But SLP presents a misleading picture
CJI: what are the offences here ? 294 etc..
Lawyer: please see the pictures Milord
CJI: Please show us the pictures.
Lawyer: It was a great humiliation
CJI: But the accused was in custody from June to August and then in October it was cancelled. Then SC granted bail… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
CJI: By impugned order of HC dated Dec 2022, a single judge of Madhya Pradesh HC cancelled bail granted to second respondent. The HC observed that bail by trial court was granted without taking into account earlier order of High Court granting bail and thus mere fact that… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Calcutta High Court bench of Acting Chief Justice TS Sivagnanam and Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya is hearing a plea regarding the Ram Navami violence that broke out in some areas in Howrah and Dalkhola districts.
On a previous hearing, the bench had ordered the State to deploy adequate police force in violence affected areas.
Counsel representing Suvendu Adhikari, PIL petitioner, seeks to place on record how the two incidents started.
ACJ: We have read in news, it is there everywhere on social media. We want to know from Advocate General as to how best is your (State's) plan to tackle the situation.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…