April 6th, 2023: @Twitter has been randomly shutting down API access for many apps and sadly we were affected today too. Hopefully we will be restored soon! We appreciate your patience until then.
#SupremeCourt to hear shortly the petition filed BJP UP Spokesperson Prashant Umrao challenging the Madras HC's pre-arrest bail condition that he should appear before police for 15 days in the criminal case for allegedly spreading fake news about attacks against Bihari migrants
A bench comprising Justices BR Gavai and Pankaj Mithal will also hear another petition filed by Prashant Umrao seeking clubbing of multiple FIRs registered by Tamil Nadu police over his tweets.
Senior Adv Siddharth Luthra for petitioner : State has multiple FIRs. I have got protection in one FIR. If I appear before police as per bail condition, I will be arrested in other FIRs.
Luthra : There was a tweet by various media agencies. I tweeted. Then there was an inaccuracy and I deleted the tweet on realising that. Now there are multiple FIRs harassing the young man.
Luthra : This was by various news agencies (reads reports of some agencies about attacks of Biharis in Tamil Nadu). I made a tweet. (15 people were hanged for speaking in Hindi). I deleted. They registered an FIR.
Luthra : Now there are multiple FIRs and they will arrest and taken me to several places and I will become like an animal in a circus ring. I deleted the tweet when I realised the error.
"Condition requiring the petitioner to report to police station between 10.30 AM to 5.30 PM for 15 days is modified. He shall appear on Monday 10 AM and thereafter as and when required by the IO".
Bench issues notice on the writ petition. Passes ad-interim order that the anticipatory bail granted by the HC would be applicable to any other FIR registered in the State of Tamil Nadu with respect to the same cause of action.
#SupremeCourt hears petition challenging Section 64 of the CrPC the ground that the said section discriminates against women by treating female members of a family incapable of accepting summons on behalf of the person summoned.
Section 64 of CrPC relates to service of summons when a person summoned cannot be found. The section states that summons can be served with an "adult male member" of the family of the person summoned.
AG: Consultation has taken place. In fact, I've personally asked the government to take an active role in this. Some of this has to do with sedition laws.
CJI DY Chandrachud: What does sedition law have to do with this?
Bombay High Court hearing a PIL challenging eligibility criteria of minimum 75% 12th boards marks for admission to courses through JEE Mains examination. @DG_NTA #BombayHighCourt#JEEMain2023
Bench of Acting CJ SV Gangapurwala and J. Sandeep V. Marne hearing the PIL filed by @anubha1812
The ordinance fixes max age of 50 years for appointment as Tribunal Members.
Sr Adv Rohatgi: These are four officers. Two of them were district Judges who left their posts and joined there, one was AOR here who left here and joined there.
Rohatgi: It is very clear that we will retire according to rules then prevailing when we applied in 2016. When they were appointed in 2018, they slipped in the line that the tenure will be 5 years or 62 whichever is earlier- this is completely wrong.
Petitioner: After the last order, there was a meeting by SC Committee on Road Safety with 15 states. Each state indicated to the committee what steps were taken. It was decided that a standardization was required - which electronic monitoring to be used, budget was also discussed
Petitioner: The committee met the Home Secretary because implementation needs to be there.
CJI DY Chandrachud: MP HC cancelled the bail. HC observed that bail was granted by Trial Court without taking into account an earlier order of HC and hence the mere fact that the chargesheet that was filed could not be considered as change in circumstances.
#SupremeCourt agrees to hear plea of journalist against whom multiple FIRs were lodged due to his tweets regarding Bihar Migrant Workers in Tamil Nadu.
The bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud has agreed to hear the matter at the end of the board today.