#Breaking : Bombay High Court is hearing stand-up comedian KUNAL KAMRA plea challenging new amendment to IT Rules empowering the Central Govt. to identify 'Fake News' about itself in the social media.
Sr Adv Seervai -The earlier bench of this court stayed a rule which was much less chilling. Once content is there, after the publication of the notification..there can be a retrospective effect.I can be cherry picked
Sr. Adv Seervai - We are challenging
Rule 3(1)(II)(A) & (C) of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2023.
He states that the Rules in effect amends Rules 3(1)(a) and 3(1)(b)(v) of the IT Rules, 2021.
Justice Patel summarises the challenge in brief...
There may be many interpretations of a certain thing or statement but that doesn't make it false or fake ...
Can you restrict, restrain or curtail outside the parameters specified?
J Patel refers to the petition - So if the Fack Check Unit of the Central Govt will take the Indian Express.. they can stop them [from publishing further articles on the topic]
Seervai - Now if the objectionable thing is repeatedly published, which happens automatically...Your account will be deactivated and you will be thrown off the platform...
Sr Adv CD Vaidyanathan (for Respondents) : Please allow me to file a reply. Can there be a permanent Prohibition? There can be ban during a health emergency but no total Prohibition.
Sr Adv Abhishek Singhvi: Previous State notification expired years ago.
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal for govt: If it is injurious to public can the year on year argument be used? Can cancer depend on it?
Bench: Why don't you ban it permanently?
Sibal: That's for the Centre.
Bench: What you can't do directly? Can you do it indirectly?
'Commander in Thief' - Bombay High Court to shortly hear Rahul Gandhi's plea seeking quashing of an FIR in Mumbai for his alleged defamatory remarks against PM Narendra Modi
Sr Adv AM Singhvi: A PIL by a political leader will get transferred to CBI. Point two, the writ is filed on 27th and the order is passed on 28th. Third, in counter before HC I've denied the allegations.
Singhvi: Your lordships have not given them a chance! How can the probe be transferred? What is the point of jurisdictional bar if CBI can enter your area without consent?
'MEDIEVIAL CONSERVATIVE MINDSET on CONCEPT of FAMILY'
#BombayHighCourt sets aside order disallowing a divorcee from adopting sister’s child on the ground that she was a SINGLE WORKING WOMAN and wouldn’t be able to give personal attention to the #child.
“Generally, a single parent is bound to be a working person, maybe with some rare exceptions. Thus, by no stretch of the imagination, a single parent can be held to be ineligible to be an adoptive parent on the ground that he/she is a working person.” - #BombayHighCourt
The comparison done between the biological mother being a housewife and the prospective adoptive mother (single parent) being a working lady reflects a mindset of the medieval conservative concepts of a family...
[Plea alleging attacks against Christians in India in #SupremeCourt]
SG Mehta: Please see the compliance. The petitioner claimed that there are some 500 incidents where Christians were attacked. We sent everything to State government.
SG Mehta: We collated all information we got. First let's see Bihar. The total number which Petitioner gave are internal fights between neighbours one of which happens to be Christian - this they have resolved.
SG Mehta: Wherever actual offence was committed, that has been noted. The figure given by them, which obviously persuaded your lordships, was not correct.