Beat The Street Profile picture
Apr 14 30 tweets 13 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
EXPOSED - SEBI DROP THE HAMMER ON BRIGHTCOM ⚠️

BEAT THE STREET EXPOSED MULTIPLE REDFLAGS, CG ISSUES LONG AGO

SEBI HAS EXPOSED MORE DARKER SIDE OF BCG - Misleading disclosures, profits, shareholding patterns, CG issues

Thread 🧵

#brightcom #brightcomgroup #bcg #sebi #redflag
Preface SEBI order covers
1. Misleading Promoter SHP
2. Undisclosed & Non - audited subsidiaries FS
3. DAUM Settlement
4. Misleading Disclosures
5. Statutory Auditor & Indep Director - inelligible
6. Accounting irregularities

This order is one of the best, give it a read
1. Misleading Promoter Shareholding - comparing promoter shareholding disclosed to the exchanges & available with RTA, Sebi found promoters inflated shareholding by 10% to 29% since 2016🧐😯 (see table below), we wrote this about in our previous thread Image
NSE also sought clarification from BCG on shareholding but there responses were unsatisfactory and incomplete (mainly related to pledge - which we also analyzed long back and found untenable) Image
SHP should have been sourced from the data maintained by RTA. However, even though the shareholding data of RTA was matching with data of Depositories, it appeared that Company had deliberately misrepresented its SHP. The co intentionally concealed the material info. Image
Sebi said this pledging and transfer of shares to lenders cast doubt over voting results

Sebi found BCG promoters guilty under SEBI SAST & PIT regulations as there actual shareholding is just 3.51%

There is strong connection between RTA & Statutory Auditor (covered later)
2. Non audited subsidiaries - SEBI LODR requires atleast 80% of assets, revenue, PAT should have been reviewed

In case of Brightcom, almost 80% of assets, revenue, PAT were unaudited - A major corporate governance issue raised by us long ago ImageImageImageImage
2. Subsidiary FS & books of accounts were not maintained. Noted significant differences & discrepancies in subsidiaries accounting.

Hence consolidated FS of BCG are not giving true & fair picture

This issue was also highlighted by us long back ImageImageImageImage
3. Lycos - Daum Settlement

The co (Ybrant) which acquired Lycos has fully written off its investment into Lycos post adverse court ruling and there will be no refund of amount already paid ($20Mn)

Shareholding of Lycos has been given to DAUM, currently Lycos is not a subs ImageImage
Ybrant filed for bankruptcy in 2015 just to delay the settlement & payment to DAUM

MD said they still expect resolution by Oct-Nov 2022, which as of today is still pending

Beat The Street raised concerns on never ending Mgt guidance about settlement ImageImage
4. Misleading disclosures
Company said they appointed EY as internal auditor. When report was sought by SEBI, it was found that report was not from EY or external party

BCG said they are not in need of external auditors, if that is the case then why they misleading disc earlier Image
Misleading Disclosures of FORENSIC AUDIT - disclosed after substantial delay of 165 days that too when exchanges gave disclosures after repetead follow - ups

Beat The Street alerted about this non disclosure long ago ImageImage
Reasons of non disclosure
Initial - requested Sebi for withdrawal, expect positive outcome. Sebi denied withdrawal.

Then they said they have given all relevant documentation and disclosure of forensic audit shouldn't be insisted upon.

NSE & SEBI made multiple follow-ups Image
5. Independent Director - inelligible
ID can be appointed only after Board Resolution + Ordinary
Resolution(1st term) / Special Resolution (2nd term)

BCG appointed Raghunath as ID for 2nd term without
shareholder resolution. Sebi said his appointment is not as per
law. ImageImage
Hence, audit committee is also not as per law
Also daughter of ID is also an employee making him inelligible
for being an ID Image
NON APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS ON
MATERIAL SUBSIDIARIES
SEBI LODR requires appointment of atleast one independent
director on board of material subsidiaries
In case of BCG, no subsidiaries had independent directon Image
STATUTORY AUDITORS OF SAME NETWORK
both statutory auditors are related to each other as partners of
one firm are either former employee or article of another firm ImageImage
RTA of the company is promoted by wife of partner of the
statutory audit firm Image
Statutory Auditor of the BCG acquired shares of the company
via preferential allotment- making his appointment inelligible Image
6. Accounting irregularities of INR 1280 crores

A. Intangible Assets under development added in current year
were capitalized next year even if these assets not met
recognition criteria Image
B. Impairment loss (INR 411 Crore) of FY19 have been disclosed
in Other Comprehensive Income instead of P&L leading to
inflated profits by 92%
In FY20, similar issue noted and if rightly accounted then
company would have been into loss ImageImage
C. Capitalized research phase expenses which should have
been expensed out through P&L leading to unde-recognition of
expenses and over-recognition of assets Image
D. Delayed impairment of assets as required by GDPR rules Image
E. BCG furnished four different responses with respect to
initial recognition of the impaired assets in the books of
accounts of its subsidiaries and consolidated financial
statements

A big lapse Image
Even after giving time of more than 1 yr, BCG still not able to provide all documents to the satisfaction of regulator Image
Sebi also took note of non disclosure of promoter stake sale of approx 19%

One of the main reason which led to Sebi investigation Image
Sebi said
BCG painted rosy picture

Not hesitate to bend rules

On top of that, the Company, from the very start, resorted
to delaying tactics, so that the investigation process got stalled. Image
Finally Sebi directed

1. Promoters to not sell shares, file correct SHP
2. Disclose subsidiaries FS
3. Get Subsidiaries audited
4. Make relevant changes in FS

- End ImageImage
It took us almost 8 hours to read, analyze and present 77 pager SEBI order against BRIGHTCOM to bring out all important facts pointed out by SEBI

If you find this valuable, please do follow us, like, retweet,comment

Thanks for being patient while reading
Brightcom response to SEBI order Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Beat The Street

Beat The Street Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BeatTheStreet10

Mar 10
How to read and analyze Order Book ? A quick thread 🧵

Dont get fared away by fancy statement Current Order book is X times of TTM revenue

#investing #curatedread #StockMarket
Most of stakeholders get flown away with big order intake or order book size which is XX times of TTM revenue. This is ❌️ approach

Always see the timelines of revenue realization of order book which will give you clear picture of potential future annual revenue from order book
Here is one example

Data Patterns which is having order book of INR 880 crores will be realized & executed in next two years thereby generating revenue of INR 440 crores which is in-line with current TTM revenue of INR 449 crores.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 10
#EKIEnergy
#Redflag

The latest Q3 Results of EKI Energy has uncovered a dark truth : non-compliance with IndAS 115, Revenue Recognition.
Auditor Walker Chandiok (Grant Thornton) today issued a qualified report.
Is this just the tip of the iceberg?

Like & share for max reach!
Reported Figures for 9M-
Revenue - 1384 Cr
PBT - 347 Cr
PAT - 260 Cr

As per Auditor -
Revenue - 1194 Cr (-14%)
PBT - 237 Cr (-32%)
PAT - 177 Cr (-32%)

Generally company also have Concall post results,this time there is no mention of concall.
Dark clouds of doubt now loom over the previous auditor D.N. Jhamb, who issued unqualified report in Sep-22, and resigned on 8-Dec-22 citing reasons of pre-occupation.

Now the bigger question is whether revenue recognised in earlier years are as per IndAS requirements or not?
Read 10 tweets
Feb 10
How related Mauritius based entities have played significant role in Adani Enterprises FPO?

Sebi is investigating relationships b/w Adani and two Mauritius-based firms

PS : These entities were not previously reported by Hindenburg

A thread🧵

#AdaniFPO #AdaniEnterprises
As per WSJ, 7 Mauritius companies collectively would have held 19.43% of the offering,

Let’s delve deeper into each of these entities and their connection
Here are 4 entities & their % of subscription to anchor book
1. Great International Tusker Fund (2.47%)
2. Ayushmat Ltd (2.32%)
3. Elm Park Fund (5.67%)
4. Aviator Global Investment Fund (1.25%)
Read 12 tweets
Jan 30
Hindenburg Reply on Adani’s Response - before CFO Media Interview!

“In terms of substance, Adani’s ‘413 page’ response only included about 30 pages focused on issues related to our report.”

#adani #AdaniGroup #hindenburg #ADANIENT #AdaniEnterprises #Hindenburg
The remainder of the response consisted of 330 pages of court records, along with 53 pages of high-level financials, general information, and details on irrelevant corporate initiatives, such as how it encourages female entrepreneurship and the production of safe vegetables.
Adani Failed To Specifically Answer 62 of Our 88 Questions

Of The Questions It Did Answer, The Group Largely Confirmed Or Attempted to Sidestep Our Findings
Read 9 tweets
Jan 28
Weekend Investing Resources Vol 25

1. Secret of Amex Rewards

2. Adani enterprises eligible for fpo?

3. Investing Mistakes by utpal Seth

4. Story of bear attack on relIance

5. Why f&o traders loose money ?

6. Curated Reads

#investing #curatedread Image
The secret behind American Express Rewards @CNBC

Whether Adani is eligible for raising money via fast track FPO considering ongoing SEBI investigation?

Read 11 tweets
Jan 28
Whether Adani is eligible for raising money via FPO

Rule says you cannot if SEBI investigation is ongoing

A detailed thread on the eligibility test of Adani Enterprises FPO

#AdaniFPO #AdaniGroup #AdaniEnterprises #ADANIENT Image
The law

As per regulation 155 of SEBI ICDR Regulations company cannot bring the FPO if investigation by sebi is ongoing or show cause notice has been served and pending Image
Backstory,In July-21 Govt in parliament responded to questions raised by @MahuaMoitra and stated that SEBI is investigating Adani Group

moneylife.in/article/sebi-d… ImageImage
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(