"At the relevant time, the accused was pursuing his career in acting and admittedly could not devote sufficient time for the deceased. However, on the earlier occasion, when the deceased tried to commit suicide the accused had saved her."
COURT - Evidence on record against accused is vague and general. No overt act or role can be attributed to the accused. Absolutely no evidence to show that on 3.6.2013 #SoorajPancholi acted in any manner which could reflect mens rea that he wanted #JiahKhan to commit suicide.
COURT - Therefore in the absence of any mens rea, instigation or aid it cannot be said that the accused had driven her to commit suicide on that day.
On Jiah's mother's claim that Sooraj Pancholi sent her a break up bouquet and therefore she committed suicide.
"On the point of break up bouquet theory there is only one witness, the watchman. In the entire evidence he did not whishper that the accused sent a bouquet to the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
CBI Court-Letter allegedly written by Jiah found after the suicide detailing the tumultuous relationship.
The gap of 4 days in getting available the said letter remains unexplained...
On Allegation the Sooraj FORCED Jiah to terminate her pregnancy.
It cannot be ignored that the deceased had suicidal tendencies. It has come on record that on an earlier occasion the deceased had attempted to commit suicide and the accused who had called upon a doctor.
Court - #SoorajPancholi had treated the deceased and had tried to get her out of the said depression. Mother's evidence relfects that she was not even aware of such an incident till the accused disclosed it to her.
Court -Nothing to indicate that #Jiah had at any point of time questioned the accused. The said acts (abortion) weas out of her own volition and therefore it cannot be said that the accused had forced the deceased to undergo a medical termination of pregnancy.
Court - Letters which were found by the sister of Jiah were not addressed to anybody. It had been allegedly stated that #SoorajPancholi had shattered her dreams that she had lost herself in her love and yet he tortured her everyday.
Court-One thing is clear that this script appears to have never reached the accused and they were found in their original form in the house of the deceased. And therefore it cannot be said that the emotions reflected in the letter had ever reached the accused.
Court - The complainant RABIA KHAN has openly shown distrust in the prosecution. When the case of the prosecution was of suicide, the complainant stated it was of murder.
Court on Rabia Khan - When expert witnesses gave their opinion regarding cause of death of the deceased as suicidal, the complainant - Rabia Khan - took exactly contradictory view stating that doctors have given a wrong opinion.
Court on Rabia Khan - The complaint raised doubts even on the doctor who conducted the postmortem examination. The complainant raised doubts on everyone except herself.
Court - It has come on record that 20 days after the death of #JiahKhan the complainant Rabia Khan got her 2nd daughter engaged at Mumbai. The conduct as such doesn't look like that of a normal person who in such a grief situation, celebrates such a program
Gujarat High Court beings hearing the criminal revision plea filed by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) seeking a stay on his conviction in the defamation case over his remark “why all thieves share the Modi surname” made during a political campaign in 2019.
Senior Advocate Abhishek Singhvi (@DrAMSinghvi) appears for Rahul Gandhi before the bench of Justice Hemant M. Prachchhak.
Senior Advocate Abhishek Singhvi (@DrAMSinghvi): The alleged offence is neither serious nor involves moral turpitude and hence, the conviction should be suspended.
#BREAKING Supreme Court to hold a special sitting in a short while to consider the challenge against the order passed by Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay of Calcutta High Court against the Secretary General of the #SupremeCourt
#SupremeCourt had earlier today directed to transfer the WB teacher recruitment scam case from Justice Gangopadhyay's bench to another bench, after taking exception to a TV interview given by the judge.
The controversial order passed by Calcutta HC Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay to the SC Secretary General, whereby the latter has been directed to produce the translation of the interview by 12 midnight today.
It clearly emerges out from the evidence that #Sisodia was connected with generation of proceeds of crime of around Rs. 100 crores in the form of advance kickbacks, which were paid by the South lobby to the co-accused Vijay Nair, through the coaccused Abhishek Boinpally: Court
The amount was received by him on behalf of Sisodia and his other political colleagues for extending undue pecuniary benefits to the conspirators and members of the cartel, which was permitted to be formed by manipulation of provisions of excise policy: Court
Chief Justice of India, Justice DY Chandrachud, will shortly inaugurate projects “Digital Courts for Contested Traffic Challans' & 'Bail Orders Sharing Module: e-Prison” launched by Delhi High Court.
Heena: My husband is an advocate himself. The three notices he sent have been by different lawyers. His signature is not even present. He has married again now.