In this perspective, Dr. Hotez offers some insights on the topics I have been writing & talking about, namely the #weaponization of conspiracy #myths by political actors to attack unwelcome scientific authority in public discourse.
He first outlines the damage: Needless deaths
How could it have come so far?
For Dr. Hotez, part of that answer lies with anti-science messaging from political elites; how else does one explain the "red covid" phenomenon?
Furthermore, there has been no course correction by political elites. If anything, they doubled down
...on their anti-scientific messaging while simultaneously creating #political theater and witch hunts against biomedical scientists, both in congress and at the state level.
This is a recipe for disaster on multiple fronts.
First, it threatens past public #health achievements like the domestic eradication of infectious diseases such as measles, polio, whooping cough; who now make a return to threatening the lives of children and families.
Second, anti-science #activism risks America's position as
science superpower, leading to brain drain, competitive #disadvantage and ultimately loss of innovative and economic power that science brings with it.
Also worth mentioning: It is wrong to target scientists with emotional #falsehoods to vilify them.
While I agree with Peter and the above, I think this anti-science #activism by politicians is just the tip of the iceberg.
Science is a #myth buster. It disrupts the convenient stories we tell ourselves, and the narratives told by those who seek to control with fictions.
But that is not new.
What is new are the disruption of our #information sphere that change how information #flows through society; and empowers now mechanisms, actors and narratives in the process, while making us and society #vulnerable to be manipulated.
And since 2020, a perfect mix of biological danger, technological disruption, social rifts and economic incentives have created an information ecosystem where falsehoods flourish, science is called into question, and democracy withers.
How to resolve this #epistemic crisis and stir towards a future where citizens are empowered by information systems, rather than manipulated and exploited by them, is one of the grand challenges of our time, and it deeply impacts #science as well as relies on it.
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This chapter dives into the ecological and molecular details underlying the natural origin of SARS-CoV-2.
It explains the extraordinary biology of bats, their unique immune systems, and their role as reservoirs for diverse coronaviruses, emphasizing the complex ...
... social structures and behaviors of bat species that facilitate viral recombination.
It describes how mosaic genomes like SARS-CoV-2’s could only have emerged through natural evolutionary processes within diverse bat populations and intermediate hosts.
2/4
The chapter stresses that no laboratory could have artificially created the complex genome of SARS-CoV-2 given current scientific capabilities
Ignoring real natural risks while focusing on evidence-free lab leak theories distracts from necessary pandemic prevention efforts
I gave a long interview to @BenjaminMateus7 about my book Lab Leak Fever and the politics surrounding the lab leak controversy.
Benjamin did a great job editing for conciseness and prompting some pretty deep questions
Some highlights in thread ⬇️
1/
"My account doesn’t rely on unverifiable Chinese sources. That independence is important politically, since both China & US have advanced self-serving narratives
From my vantage point in Switzerland, I aimed to cut through this geopolitical tug-of-war and focus on the evidence."
"My guiding principle has been clear: “To all defenders of an evidence-based worldview”—the dedication in my book.
Evidence, not speculation, not deference to elites, not blind trust in science, but reasoned, evidence-based inquiry."
The anti-vaccine movement became a juggernaut during COVID-19 by exploiting people's anxieties & profiting from their fears
Because emotional manipulation is politically valuable, republicans soon merged with the ideology
Unfortunately, that caused over 200k Americans to die
2/
... just during the delta wave alone.
Given estimates of 1,4 million excess deaths since 2020, half of it after vaccines became available, the odds are that vaccine-preventable death toll was even higher.
A huge political liability for Republicans if voters woke up to that.
3/
I don't know, but I feel like the cool kids don't get sucked into magical worldviews and waste their time live-action roleplaying as "investigators" in trite conspiracy myths.
Which makes all of those in the media who fall for them, over and over again, kinda embarassing?
There is no version of the lab leak idea that does not assume conspiratorial elements, given the evidence we have today.
There is no lab leak "theory" in the first place, just innuendo and magical thinking with mutual contradictory ideas that can not explain available evidence
Given the overwhelming evidence for a zoonotic origin, the scientific case is long clear.
What remains of the lab leak is a zombie idea, a myth kept alive by, sorry to say, mostly science deniers, activists, media manipulators and too many suckers that keep amplifying it.
During the election season, discourse manipulators and influence campaigns work overtime to mislead citizens about scientific topics.
Here are 18 common tactics explained, why it works, and why you should guard yourself against it.
A 🧵
1/
First up are the merchants of doubt
They use an array of manipulation techniques to denounce experts with various smear tactics, deny a scientific consensus exists, and deceive the public with irrelevant stories.
They distort scientific arguments by turning them into partisan fights, discredit proponents of an evidence-based worldview & dismiss the scientific method with appeals to intuition
Conspiracy theorists are shocked to learn that a science blogger writing about the bat origins of SARS-CoV-2 visits field sampling expeditions to interview bat researchers 😅
Good journalistic practice must be a nefarious plot 🤣
A niche 🧵 about conspiratorial ideation
1/
Yesterday, I posted the above fotos to explain that my writing is based on expert interviews, personal research experience, scientific analysis and of course legwork.
Conspiracy theorists have claimed since 2022 that I must be a "paid" shill; from China, Biden, Fauci or EHA
2/
For them, the idea that somebody could keep speaking up for science and scientists because he believes it is the right thing (& despite their hardest efforts to bully me out of the conversation with harassments), is unthinkable.