Philipp Markolin, PhD Profile picture
May 2, 2023 10 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Frustrating but important perspective by @PeterHotez:

"The phenomenon of red Covid was not a random occurrence but instead an expected outcome of predation linked to extremist politics"

Read in full:

A few thoughts follow 🔽
faseb.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1096/fb…
In this perspective, Dr. Hotez offers some insights on the topics I have been writing & talking about, namely the #weaponization of conspiracy #myths by political actors to attack unwelcome scientific authority in public discourse.

He first outlines the damage: Needless deaths Image
How could it have come so far?

For Dr. Hotez, part of that answer lies with anti-science messaging from political elites; how else does one explain the "red covid" phenomenon?

Furthermore, there has been no course correction by political elites. If anything, they doubled down Image
...on their anti-scientific messaging while simultaneously creating #political theater and witch hunts against biomedical scientists, both in congress and at the state level.

This is a recipe for disaster on multiple fronts. Image
First, it threatens past public #health achievements like the domestic eradication of infectious diseases such as measles, polio, whooping cough; who now make a return to threatening the lives of children and families.

Second, anti-science #activism risks America's position as Image
science superpower, leading to brain drain, competitive #disadvantage and ultimately loss of innovative and economic power that science brings with it.

Also worth mentioning: It is wrong to target scientists with emotional #falsehoods to vilify them.
While I agree with Peter and the above, I think this anti-science #activism by politicians is just the tip of the iceberg.

Science is a #myth buster. It disrupts the convenient stories we tell ourselves, and the narratives told by those who seek to control with fictions. Image
But that is not new.

What is new are the disruption of our #information sphere that change how information #flows through society; and empowers now mechanisms, actors and narratives in the process, while making us and society #vulnerable to be manipulated. Image
And since 2020, a perfect mix of biological danger, technological disruption, social rifts and economic incentives have created an information ecosystem where falsehoods flourish, science is called into question, and democracy withers. Image
How to resolve this #epistemic crisis and stir towards a future where citizens are empowered by information systems, rather than manipulated and exploited by them, is one of the grand challenges of our time, and it deeply impacts #science as well as relies on it.

/end Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Philipp Markolin, PhD

Philipp Markolin, PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PhilippMarkolin

May 15
Decent article from @benjmueller at NYT about the administration's political decision to defund EHA.

He ends on a curious note 🔽

"Why now, 3 years after all the banalities the HHS cites to justify the farce were already known?"

I have some thoughts

1/
nytimes.com/2024/05/15/hea…
Image
It is a critically important election year, so the Biden WH can not afford to have this emotional issue with large visibility be a differentiator between the parties.

They have to act as the ones driving accountability so the Republicans can not weaponize it against them

2/ Image
No party or politician gives a hoot about Ecohealth Alliance, it is a small non-profit with no political weight or power

Cutting off its funding makes politicians look good; they can pretend to hold "bad people" accountable in a bi-partisan fashion & not ruffle many feathers

3/ Image
Read 8 tweets
May 3
There will be a ramp-up of media coverage to bring the false #lableak myth back to the attention of the masses; right when the general election heats up.

Multiple reasons for this, first and foremost the political need for emotional activation of potential voters

A short🧵 Image
As I have written previously, the #lableak myth is a powerful emotional narrative that profits from the many incentive asymmetries in our modern information ecosystems.

This ensures not only attention, but retention in public discourse.

Read:


2/ protagonist-science.com/p/a-tale-of-tw…
Image
Emotional myths that provide a simple explanation for why a large, traumatic world event like a pandemic had to be the cause of some shadowy powerful actors are appealing; they offer an agent to blame, and the illusion of control of these phenomena.

They win some people over.
3/
Read 15 tweets
Apr 13
The Furin-cleavage site (#FCS) in SARS-CoV-2 is one of the most misunderstood genetic elements in the whole #originsofcovid story.

#lableak proponents consider it a "pandemic trigger" that was recklessly inserted by #GoF researchers

Do they have a point?

A thread
1/ Image
Especially an unfunded research proposal from 2018 called DEFUSE that got played up by amplifiers empowered imaginations.

So before we jump into the FCS itself, a quick sidebar here 🔽

While DEFUSE is irrelevant, it hightlights two telling misconceptions

2/ Image
First, the common confusion that the introduction of a single genetic element has the power to make a pandemic pathogen

Second, the deliberate deception about how likely it is that nature or engineering came up with the FCS insertion

Let's clear them up.
3/
Read 16 tweets
Apr 11
🚨🚨 Did SARS-CoV-2 come from gain-of-function research? And if so, will we ever find out?

I have been on a scientific journey for a definitive answer that took me to the cutting edge of #covidorigin science.

Here is what I found
➡️ open.substack.com/pub/protagonis…
It is fair to say that virology has been seen with suspicion and experts are distrusted.

How much of this is self-inflicted, and how much is driven by forces beyond science?

The idea of arcane gain-of-function experiments creating flask monsters is powerful, it evokes fears. Image
But outside the heated spotlight of speculations & accusations, a scientific question still needs a scientific answer.

Some say the true origins will never be found, and some governments explicitly root for that outcome.

But if you gift me your curiosity, we'll prove them wrong Image
Read 6 tweets
Mar 9
Very interesting paper from Jijón S. et al., using a population-dynamic approach (not a whole genome seq. approach) to date the first spillover event of the Wuhan outbreak

--> Nov.28

This is a methodologically independent confirmation of previously published estimates.

1/ https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011934
The idea is to look at how an epidemic progresses (based on branching) and infer these dynamical parameters from known progressions

Once the model is calibrated, it can be used to estimate a time window when the first infection likely occurred; which might be before the tMRCA
2/
Image
Image
This is a complementary approach to phylogenetic dating that uses the mutational divergence over time to calculate back when the first cases likely occurred.

Overall, it matches previous estimates. So nothing new?

Let me quickly explain why I think this is important work:

3/
Read 6 tweets
Jan 5
As 2024 ushered in a new year of myth, #manipulation & magical thinking, too few have adjusted to counterbalance the #vulnerabilities of our broken information ecosystem

During US elections, this might spell democratic backsliding as online #discourse will be weaponized

A 🧵
1/
The disruption of our information technology broke a few things we needed as guardrails for democracy, such as the free flow of information & journalistic principles for information sharing

Today, gatekeepers have changed to:
#Algorithms, #influencers & #audience demand

2/
The dynamics and incentives between those three largely shape what information average citizens get to see

This is problematic because info #shapers are not aligned with public interest or democracy, but rather with the pursuit of #popularity, #persuasion, #profit, or #power

3/
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(