In this perspective, Dr. Hotez offers some insights on the topics I have been writing & talking about, namely the #weaponization of conspiracy #myths by political actors to attack unwelcome scientific authority in public discourse.
He first outlines the damage: Needless deaths
How could it have come so far?
For Dr. Hotez, part of that answer lies with anti-science messaging from political elites; how else does one explain the "red covid" phenomenon?
Furthermore, there has been no course correction by political elites. If anything, they doubled down
...on their anti-scientific messaging while simultaneously creating #political theater and witch hunts against biomedical scientists, both in congress and at the state level.
This is a recipe for disaster on multiple fronts.
First, it threatens past public #health achievements like the domestic eradication of infectious diseases such as measles, polio, whooping cough; who now make a return to threatening the lives of children and families.
Second, anti-science #activism risks America's position as
science superpower, leading to brain drain, competitive #disadvantage and ultimately loss of innovative and economic power that science brings with it.
Also worth mentioning: It is wrong to target scientists with emotional #falsehoods to vilify them.
While I agree with Peter and the above, I think this anti-science #activism by politicians is just the tip of the iceberg.
Science is a #myth buster. It disrupts the convenient stories we tell ourselves, and the narratives told by those who seek to control with fictions.
But that is not new.
What is new are the disruption of our #information sphere that change how information #flows through society; and empowers now mechanisms, actors and narratives in the process, while making us and society #vulnerable to be manipulated.
And since 2020, a perfect mix of biological danger, technological disruption, social rifts and economic incentives have created an information ecosystem where falsehoods flourish, science is called into question, and democracy withers.
How to resolve this #epistemic crisis and stir towards a future where citizens are empowered by information systems, rather than manipulated and exploited by them, is one of the grand challenges of our time, and it deeply impacts #science as well as relies on it.
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It is a critically important election year, so the Biden WH can not afford to have this emotional issue with large visibility be a differentiator between the parties.
They have to act as the ones driving accountability so the Republicans can not weaponize it against them
2/
No party or politician gives a hoot about Ecohealth Alliance, it is a small non-profit with no political weight or power
Cutting off its funding makes politicians look good; they can pretend to hold "bad people" accountable in a bi-partisan fashion & not ruffle many feathers
There will be a ramp-up of media coverage to bring the false #lableak myth back to the attention of the masses; right when the general election heats up.
Multiple reasons for this, first and foremost the political need for emotional activation of potential voters
A short🧵
As I have written previously, the #lableak myth is a powerful emotional narrative that profits from the many incentive asymmetries in our modern information ecosystems.
This ensures not only attention, but retention in public discourse.
Emotional myths that provide a simple explanation for why a large, traumatic world event like a pandemic had to be the cause of some shadowy powerful actors are appealing; they offer an agent to blame, and the illusion of control of these phenomena.
Very interesting paper from Jijón S. et al., using a population-dynamic approach (not a whole genome seq. approach) to date the first spillover event of the Wuhan outbreak
--> Nov.28
This is a methodologically independent confirmation of previously published estimates.
1/
The idea is to look at how an epidemic progresses (based on branching) and infer these dynamical parameters from known progressions
Once the model is calibrated, it can be used to estimate a time window when the first infection likely occurred; which might be before the tMRCA 2/
This is a complementary approach to phylogenetic dating that uses the mutational divergence over time to calculate back when the first cases likely occurred.
Overall, it matches previous estimates. So nothing new?
Let me quickly explain why I think this is important work:
3/
As 2024 ushered in a new year of myth, #manipulation & magical thinking, too few have adjusted to counterbalance the #vulnerabilities of our broken information ecosystem
During US elections, this might spell democratic backsliding as online #discourse will be weaponized
A 🧵
1/
The disruption of our information technology broke a few things we needed as guardrails for democracy, such as the free flow of information & journalistic principles for information sharing
Today, gatekeepers have changed to:
#Algorithms, #influencers & #audience demand
2/
The dynamics and incentives between those three largely shape what information average citizens get to see
This is problematic because info #shapers are not aligned with public interest or democracy, but rather with the pursuit of #popularity, #persuasion, #profit, or #power
3/