Here is the claim from @BillyZhong229 the lead author, who seems to be a student (his twitter is less than a year old).
It's propaganda reinforcing the "Antimicrobial stewardship" dictat:
YOU WILL NOT PRESCRIBE ANTIBIOTICS FOR COVID
What were "COVID-19 national restrictions"?
Well I did this analysis back in Feb showing the HUGE GAP between normal cyclical antibiotic prescriptions and the actual prescriptions during COVID - when GPs were told to stop prescribing antibiotics to the elderly and give them #midazolam instead.
When .@OpenSAFELY publish, you can't verify anything. They did the same when @bengoldacre published a study showing that #hydroxychloroquine didn't help in COVID, in the Lancet after the Lancet had already published fraudulent data on the same subject.
But don't think you're allowed to view that data. Oh no, @TheLancet damn well learnt their lesson from being exposed publishing fraudulent studies in the #surgisphere scandal and made sure that Goldacre's paper was shut down tight.
And don't think @OpenSAFELY's data sharing has become any more transparent.
The opposite. Locked down tighter, but if you're a foreign PhD student with no publication history - no problem.
TPP is a Chinese company. Nothing wrong with that. Good for them. They have a bona fide 18-digit Chinese business registration, otherwise known as a "Unified Social Credit Indicator"
They have access to all the OPENSAFELY data.
But that's not all.
OPENSAFELY is funded by Wellcome (#BigPharma's slush fund) and Matt Hancock's infamous HDRUK.
HDRUK was the group convened to skim your health data under the leadership of Nicole Junkermann - of Jeffrey Epstein and Panama Papers fame.
So, 3 months after we first exposed the #midazolam and #3tablets scandals - where the elderly were denied antibiotics for their post-viral pneumonia and euthanised instead "because muh COVID"....
An unverifiable paper appears from this bunch telling us there is nothing to see.
No problem.
I'm sure Ben, Victoria Palin and Billy (Xiaomin) Zhang will be keen to show their probity in this paper.
And kudos to Victoria Palin btw, the supervising author on this paper. Victoria had never published a first author paper before 2019 and is now a supervising author.
And thank you for helping get everyone vaccinated Vicky!
Fortunately Vicky is an expert in Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS), which is the propaganda that was used in 2019 to lay the groundwork for denying antibiotics to the elderly in 2020.
Well done Vicky, you did your job to the letter. #3tablets
The gift that keeps on giving. #Opensafely is one big nepotistic Pharmafest.
➡LSTHM.
➡Sander van der Linden.
➡David Spiegelhalter.
➡University of Cambridge Winton centre (psyop central command) @FeeRedfern@profnfenton@jengleruk
Their CEO is Andy Thorburn, who was Digicel's CEO. Digicel famously "won" the contract for telecom services after the #Haiti earthquake. Friends of the Clinton Foundation.
For the record this is the second paper from the same group, essentially trying the same propaganda move - suggesting that antibiotic prescribing increased in 2020, contradicting the public data.
According to the repository the last output for this was 6th April. Which means the paper had to be written after that, revised, resubmitted and published by 15th May. Pretty good going. Usually this would take about 8-12 weeks.
Just a note that the Victoria Palin in the vaccination promotion shown above from 2020 could be a different Victoria Palin from our Opensafely supervising author who appears to have seen this thread, and instead of coming to the defence of the data...
Has blocked me. Oh well.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It looks like we found our vector.
They moved from spraying live (cloned) viruses to putting them in drinking water.. which we thought wasn't possible due to chlorine.
Well, it turns out that it is, if you use a stabiliser.
The @NIH told us that they stopped funding GOFROC research but they clearly didn't.
This is a modified live virus. That is, they took a pathogenic influenza and genetically modified it and propagated it using infectious clones (reverse genetics). nature.com/articles/s4154…
"MLVs were diluted in distilled water containing Vac-Pac Plus (Best Veterinary 418 Solutions, Columbus, GA, USA) to neutralize residual chlorine and adjust the pH"
There are a lot of pharma agents celebrating on twitter recently because the now-conflicted @cochranecollab dropped their standards and published something on HPV vaccination they didn't understand.
To explain it you need to understand the difference between the two studies quoted.
The first (Bergman) analysed a bunch of real studies (including RCTs) and concluded that the effect on cancer couldn't be seen - despite nearly 20 years of follow up.
The second (Henschke) cherry picked a bunch of "real world data" studies and concluded that the vaccine prevented a gazillion cervical cancers, pretending that it analysed 132 million patient records. It did nothing of the sort. What it did was look at two studies, take out the bit where it showed that the vaccine increased the risk of cancer (Kjaer 2021, over 20s) - replicated in multiple country statistics, split them into three studies, ignore the other studies showing the opposite, and ignore the fact that none of this data is verifiable.
Notably, one of the major studies (Palmer 2024, which was found to be seriously flawed) has been excluded from the meta-analysis because it did not show a cancer benefit in the under 16 age group.
It is very difficult to "fix" a randomised controlled trial.
It is very easy to "fix" a meta-analysis of observational studies where the data is "not available".
There is a huge difference between "real" studies and "real world data" studies because the latter are cherry picked or even fully synthetic, and the authors don't have access to the data. They are produced by vested interests groups to sell a narrative.
This was the most corrupted review that Cochrane have ever performed and this time they shot themselves in the foot by contradicting their own reviews. cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.10…
your childish insults drew my attention to your lab's quite incredible paper confirming that chronic activation of cGAS-STING, as happens with plasmid-contaminated vaccines, causes cancer.
Retraction Watch busted for collusion with Rolf Marschalek, who is not only part of BioNtech's Goethe university..
but - get this - their Corona fund was pump primed by the Quandt family - infamous for their role in Nazi Germany.
The dude keeps going, but betrays that this is a copycat to a bunch of accounts linked to one dubbed "Penguin" that only appeared when I pointed out the Joe Sansone scam that is being coordinated by Sasha Latypova to derail legal cases.
This is also strange.
The Quentin registry study shows a big jump in vaccination rate by age group but the Bernard study doesn't show the same.
This is more like what a synthetic data set might show based on assumed characteristics of the underlying data.
There are possible explanations for all of these anomalies, but this is the problem with secret registry data:
It's not credible when it conveniently matches a narrative and nobody is allowed to see it.