Here is the claim from @BillyZhong229 the lead author, who seems to be a student (his twitter is less than a year old).
It's propaganda reinforcing the "Antimicrobial stewardship" dictat:
YOU WILL NOT PRESCRIBE ANTIBIOTICS FOR COVID
What were "COVID-19 national restrictions"?
Well I did this analysis back in Feb showing the HUGE GAP between normal cyclical antibiotic prescriptions and the actual prescriptions during COVID - when GPs were told to stop prescribing antibiotics to the elderly and give them #midazolam instead.
When .@OpenSAFELY publish, you can't verify anything. They did the same when @bengoldacre published a study showing that #hydroxychloroquine didn't help in COVID, in the Lancet after the Lancet had already published fraudulent data on the same subject.
But don't think you're allowed to view that data. Oh no, @TheLancet damn well learnt their lesson from being exposed publishing fraudulent studies in the #surgisphere scandal and made sure that Goldacre's paper was shut down tight.
And don't think @OpenSAFELY's data sharing has become any more transparent.
The opposite. Locked down tighter, but if you're a foreign PhD student with no publication history - no problem.
TPP is a Chinese company. Nothing wrong with that. Good for them. They have a bona fide 18-digit Chinese business registration, otherwise known as a "Unified Social Credit Indicator"
They have access to all the OPENSAFELY data.
But that's not all.
OPENSAFELY is funded by Wellcome (#BigPharma's slush fund) and Matt Hancock's infamous HDRUK.
HDRUK was the group convened to skim your health data under the leadership of Nicole Junkermann - of Jeffrey Epstein and Panama Papers fame.
So, 3 months after we first exposed the #midazolam and #3tablets scandals - where the elderly were denied antibiotics for their post-viral pneumonia and euthanised instead "because muh COVID"....
An unverifiable paper appears from this bunch telling us there is nothing to see.
No problem.
I'm sure Ben, Victoria Palin and Billy (Xiaomin) Zhang will be keen to show their probity in this paper.
And kudos to Victoria Palin btw, the supervising author on this paper. Victoria had never published a first author paper before 2019 and is now a supervising author.
And thank you for helping get everyone vaccinated Vicky!
Fortunately Vicky is an expert in Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS), which is the propaganda that was used in 2019 to lay the groundwork for denying antibiotics to the elderly in 2020.
Well done Vicky, you did your job to the letter. #3tablets
The gift that keeps on giving. #Opensafely is one big nepotistic Pharmafest.
➡LSTHM.
➡Sander van der Linden.
➡David Spiegelhalter.
➡University of Cambridge Winton centre (psyop central command) @FeeRedfern@profnfenton@jengleruk
Their CEO is Andy Thorburn, who was Digicel's CEO. Digicel famously "won" the contract for telecom services after the #Haiti earthquake. Friends of the Clinton Foundation.
For the record this is the second paper from the same group, essentially trying the same propaganda move - suggesting that antibiotic prescribing increased in 2020, contradicting the public data.
According to the repository the last output for this was 6th April. Which means the paper had to be written after that, revised, resubmitted and published by 15th May. Pretty good going. Usually this would take about 8-12 weeks.
Just a note that the Victoria Palin in the vaccination promotion shown above from 2020 could be a different Victoria Palin from our Opensafely supervising author who appears to have seen this thread, and instead of coming to the defence of the data...
Has blocked me. Oh well.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What @TheBurninBeard is saying here is that the clinical samples that had "COVID" also had gene signatures of Mycoplasma fermentans, a US military pathogen that can be used as a vector to carry viral clones.
@SabinehazanMD found it too.
🧵
#spraygate @BrokenTruthTV
Can you see that Norman Pieniazek, who headed up the CDC's research division at the time that the @CDCgov sent biological weapons to Iraq to start a war, took himself out of this thread?
Every vaccine scientist will try to convince you that the drop in u25 cancers was due to the vaccine when it was merely due to the change in screening.
But check out the HUGE RISE in 25+ cancers. This pattern is repeated in Scotland and Australia where similar changes to the screening age were made a few years after the introduction of coerced vaccination, obfuscating the figures to hide a scandalous rise in 25-29 age cervical cancers after the vaccine rollout.
For clarity most cancers in this age group are early and detected on screening before they become advanced. Moving the screening age meant that they were diagnosed later and therefore in an older age bracket.
The big red arrow is pointing to the preinvasive diagnoses which tend to mirror the actual cancers - the upper chart was too busy.
Here is the same from the OP with arrows showing both cancer (above) and precancer (below) which both rose significantly after the vaccine rollout
And here is the same data from Cancer Research UK (smoothed) showing a doubling of cancer rates in the over 25s for at least 5 years after the vaccine rollout. cancerresearchuk.org/health-profess…