They're trying to understand if there's immunological factors that prevent some people getting infected (among other things). 🧵
As a "never infected" participant, I got to partake. though my infection status is due to FFP3 & living a fairly isolated disabled life rather than my immune system being super awesome
nothing interesting here. free light chain abnormalities can indicate amyloidosis. symptoms that can include weakness, fatigue, numbness/tingling in arms/legs
i fit the symptoms but no sign this is part of my pathology
Protein electrophoresis: normal
This can indicate inflammatory diseases.
A limitation of these results is that im on immunosuppressive drugs: fludrocortisone, aspirin, ketotifen
still positive for spike antibodies. based on the Abbott kit we were using locally, im nearing the minimum the test can detect, so i doubt this is a high positive
still negative for nucleocapsid antibodies. shocked face.
Hep B antibodies 988 miu (> 100 = immune)
This is a relief. I was advised wrong in my PhD and only got 2 of the 3 shots and no Ab test at the time. I was then advised to get my 3rd whilst working in the NHS. i refused because of my COVID vax reaction, so glad im well protected
Varicella Zoster antibodies: positive
Measles antibodies: positive
Relieved to see measles is +ve as my med records indicate i only had 2 MMR jabs as a kid, dunno why. again i refused the 3rd when offered working in NHS due to my covid vax reaction
Lymphocyte subsets: normal
im not sure these data are useful to the study. as above im very COVID cautious, wearing face fitted FFP3s at work, out and about, and if anyone comes in the flat (they also wear FFP3 and the windows get opened). plus the meds im on might skew things. but i found it interesting!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Latest paper from Dr Robin Kerr & me: #LongCovid is primarily a Spike protein Induced Thrombotic Vasculitis researchsquare.com/article/rs-293…
Here we proposed that long covid is primarily a spike protein-induced thrombotic vasculitis, & we use Robin as a supporting case study 🧵 #TeamClots
We start by discussing the highly thrombotic nature of acute COVID & how this pathology doesnt cease in those with long COVID. in other words, long COVID is a continuation of the pathology accompanying acute COVID. Importantly, we cant rehabilitate until the pathology is treated
we highlight the role of microclots in capillary occlusion, that coagulopathic outcomes occur after acute covid (e.g. ↑ stroke risk), that there is platelet hyperactivation and endotheliitis, and all this leads to impaired oxygen extraction (and more)
1. Last year we found:
👉🏻severe B12 deficiency
✅low MMA after B12 replacement...
❌...but still elevated homocysteine
❔low-normal folate
❌no MTHFR gene variant
✅...but correction of homocysteine after folic acid supplementation
Example: my haematological treatment is based on standard pulmonary emboli guidelines. These do not take into account the complexity of my case, so how can my treatment be evidence based?
The doctor is essentially winging it as much as doctors treating #postvac#LongCovid outwith guidelines...because there are no evidence based guidelines right now
"You expect me to believe blood sugar is the reason we needed to amputate your leg?"
"Riiiiggghhht, so the lump in your lung has just *moved* to your liver..."
"And how exactly do you think shellfish made your throat swell up?!"
"Youre saying the virus has been hiding in your body and has now come back to life and given you shingles?"
"Really, you think your own immune system is 'attacking' you"
"There's no evidence a head injury can make you thirsty"
Physiology is complex.
It utterly baffles me that so many doctors seem to think we know and understand it all, that what they learnt at med school is fact and final, that things they cant imagine happening *might actually be happening*.
Ofc if we got rid of the source there'd be no problem, right?
Well yeah but i dont think thats realistic since any1 can say anything & even make a false but evidence based conclusion (see pinned tweet). We dont all believe everything we hear, theres reasons we believe what we do
Finland puts a lot of effort into this and it seems more successful than binary "blame the disinfo spreaders" narratives many of us have