π§΅
What is the probability that .@sarahjestock - who is the Program Director of @WellcomeLeap - should be randomly the corresponding author on a paper that she didn't write, relating to datasets that can't be audited, showing "no pregnancy problems with mRNA vaccines"?
And what is the probability that @sarahjestock has written 50 papers in 2 years whilst being a full time obstetrician, university professor at two universities, program director at @WellcomeLeap...
And in her papers declares no conflicts of interest...
It's hit and miss, you see. When it's a pregnancy in vaccine paper there are no conflicts of interest. When it's another paper, we'll declare them but they aren't really conflicts because they are just Pharma so that's fine
And can you believe it? Sarah Stock - whose name is on over 100 papers - just happened to team up with Colin Simpson in 2020!
What a coincidence!
And these are the two players behind the Scottish COVID vaccine in pregnancy data
The HDRUK Impact of the Year award 2021?
Really?
They kept that quiet.
So you went from teacher's pet at Nicole Junkermann's and Matt Hancock's HDRUK...
Which is infamous for its links to Jeffrey Epstein via Nicole Junkermann
To be in charge of New Zealand's Electronic Health Data.
Oh good. I'm sure New Zealanders can now sleep easy knowing that their health data is getting the "HDRUK" treatment and being pawned off to Pharma to create synthetic data sets to sell more drugs that don't work? #EMRgate
And it's so pleasing to see such collaboration and obviously with all your awards it's understandable that you don't remember to declare your conflicts of interest.
So let me ask you both this important question:
Did first author Clara Calvert analyse the 500,000+ patient data sets for those Nature papers, verify them and write the papers - or were they ghost written for her?
Just a reminder that Per is the developer of the #MAGICapp, an AI based protocol generator that told the world to withdraw antibiotics from the elderly for their post-viral (bacterial) pneumonia if they happened to have a positive "COVID" test. Then they died.
This is how it works.
Your hospital signs you up to an overseas EMR (health record) corporation.
They get your health data.
You get zip.
That data is used to generate artificial study data that promotes a drug, and Pharma makes $billions.
Here's an example. @addenbrookes hospital - one of the biggest hospitals in the country and a massive #BigPharma advocate...
Gives your health data to @epic.
What, you didn't know?
It's written in the T&C. Right at the bottom of a 4,400 word disclaimer.
Can't you see it?
Now comes the smart part.
Usually @NEJM or @TheLancet are involved.
A noob medic comes along with a first author paper from a massive collaboration of people who don't know each other.
@IQVIA_global@MartinNeil9 BINGO. Holy crap.
This study was published in 2020 and was basically the third in the #Lancetgate series.
Completely unverifiable and no possibility of being real data.
Where did the data come from?
IQVIA. Jennifer Lane (an unknown). Oxford. OHDSI...
Here is the claim from @BillyZhong229 the lead author, who seems to be a student (his twitter is less than a year old).
It's propaganda reinforcing the "Antimicrobial stewardship" dictat:
YOU WILL NOT PRESCRIBE ANTIBIOTICS FOR COVID
What were "COVID-19 national restrictions"?
Well I did this analysis back in Feb showing the HUGE GAP between normal cyclical antibiotic prescriptions and the actual prescriptions during COVID - when GPs were told to stop prescribing antibiotics to the elderly and give them #midazolam instead.