Given the sad trombone that was Artur’s press conference/sermon today, does Smith appreciate how much of a nothing burger the “optics” of Artur’s condemnation in January would have been if she had never made the call?
On a separate but somewhat related note, is anyone else struck by how sad it is for a person to be worried about the approval of someone like Artur?
For most, his condemnation would be a Medal of Honor…
/2
But here’s the scary part…
Alberta had a premier who is so desperate for approval that she broke the law to try and avoid Artur’s condemnation and was willing to interfere in the administration of justice.
That’s how vulnerable the province of Alberta is and was.
/3
It is only that Shandro (of all people) drew a character line in the sand that Smith wasn’t able to put her desperate need for public approval ahead of the actual public good.
That’s literally where we were in January.
Take that in Alberta.
Vote accordingly
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's a thread of true things that happened surrounding a luxury apartment which led to us being threatened with legal action today by a high ranking employee of a crown minister...
So anyways, back in October we were wandering through the inter webs looking for headshots of a few UCP heavy hitters when we came across this particular image with a luxurious amount of hair...
/2
Of course, we were super curious about where the source of this photo was, and it turns out it was a somewhat derelict LinkedIn page...
Jordon is one of the people who is dog whistling for people to be confrontational with door knockers and straight up telling them to record the conversations.
/2
When a woman did exactly that and chased a group of door knockers down the street, did he call for civility?
On last nights episode, we played a video of an anti-vaxxer berating a door knocking team.
We also played a video of @PierrePoilievre sidestepping a conspiracy theory question.
We believe we clearly called out the misinformation and falsehoods.
/1
That being said, YouTube removed the video and episode.
We’re in the process of editing the word “vaccine” out of the episode and reposting it.
But just to be absolutely clear, we stand with the science of vaccination and we believe falsehoods need to be called out.
/2
The point of the segment was to highlight how political leaders all too often dodge questions as opposed to correcting falsehoods, which only further reinforces false beliefs and radicalizes people.
/3