Live Law Profile picture
May 26 10 tweets 6 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
#SupremeCourt to hear today a PIL seeking a direction that the #NewParliamentBuilding should be inaugurated by President #DroupadiMurmu instead of Prime Minister #NarendraModi.

Petitioner says Lok Sabha secretariat violated the Constitution by not inviting the #President. Image
A bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and PS Narasimha to hear the plea #ParliamentBuilding #SupremeCourtofIndia
Counsel: The head of the executive is the President... President is my president.

Justice Narasimha: We don't understand why you come with such petitions but we're not interested in entertaining it under Article 32.

#SupremeCourtofIndia #SupremeCourt
Justice Maheshwari: How is Article 79 relevant here?

Adv Jayasukin: The president is the head of the parliament. Any of the provision, any act says that...

#ParliamentBuilding #SupremeCourtofIndia
Justice Maheshwari: How is it related to address and inauguration?

Adv Jayasukin: It totally violates Article 79 and 87. President is the head of the parliament, he should open the building. Executive head is the only head who should open.

#ParliamentBuilding
Adv Jayasukin: Already some provisions are there, 79 and 85 articles are there that the president is head of the parliament. How can PM inaugurate?

#ParliamentBuilding #SupremeCourtofIndia
Adv Jayasukin: In case the matter is dismissed, permit me to withdraw.

#ParliamentBuilding #SupremeCourtofIndia
Justice Maheshwari: After arguing for quite some time, the petition seeks permission to withdraw. Mr SG, any problem?

SG Mehta: Withdrawal means that he will go and argue in HC. The court should say that these cases are not to be argued

#ParliamentBuilding #SupremeCourtofIndia
Justice Maheshwari: Will you go to HC? Then we will dismiss.

Adv Jayasukin: I will not go to HC. But withdrawing because the dismissal will mean that they have a certificate to do this.

#ParliamentBuilding #SupremeCourtofIndia
Justice Maheshwari: After arguing for some time, the counsel has withdrawn the petition.

SG Mehta: Please add that he withdrew after the court was not inclined...

Justice Maheshwari: ...the court was not inclined.

#ParliamentBuilding #SupremeCourtofIndia

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Live Law

Live Law Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LiveLawIndia

May 26
Bombay High Court hearing Sameer Wankhede's co-accused Sam D'Souza's plea seeking quashing of CBI case alleging over Rs 25 crore corruption in the 2021 Cordelia Cruise Ship Drug Bust.

#SamDSouza
#SameerWankhede #BombayHighCourt
#CBI
#AryanKhan Image
Hearing before the vacation bench of Justice Abhay Ahuja and Justice MM Sathaye
#SamDSouza
#SameerWankhede #BombayHighCourt
#CBI
#AryanKhan
Earlier the court extended interim relief to Sameer Wankhede against any coercive action till June 8, 2023 subject to his not giving any press statement or publishing any material on the matter
#SamDSouza
#SameerWankhede #BombayHighCourt
#CBI
#AryanKhan

livelaw.in/high-court/bom…
Read 15 tweets
May 26
#Breaking

Delhi Court grants no objection for issuance of fresh passport to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi.

Court says that the NOC will be valid for 3 years. He prayed that the same be granted for 10 years.

#DelhiCourt #RahulGandhi #Passport Image
ACMM Vaibhav Mehta of Rouse Avenue Courts partly allowed #RahulGandhi’s application seeking no objection for issuance of fresh ordinary passport to him for 10 years, after he surrendered his diplomatic passport on being disqualified as a Member of Parliament.
The application was moved by Gandhi in the National Herald case filed by former MP Subramanian Swamy against him. He and his mother Sonia Gandhi were granted bail in the case in December 2015. However, the court had not put any condition regarding travel on him.
Read 4 tweets
May 26
#DelhiHighCourt adjourns to Monday hearing in the PIL challenging Reserve Bank of India's recent decision to withdraw Rs 2,000 notes from circulation.

#RBI’s counsel said that the court has already reserved judgment in a similar PIL challenging the decision.

#2000RupeesNote Image
Senior Advocate Parag Tripathi appearing for RBI said that the RBI’s recent decision is not demonetisation and is only an exercise of currency management. He suggested that the matter be heard on a later date as judgment has already been reserved in similar PIL.

#DelhiHighCourt
On the other hand, it is the petitioner’s case that RBI has no independent power under RBI Act to take such decision. The PIL has been filed by advocate Rajneesh Bhaskar Gupta.

#DelhiHighCourt #2000RupeesNote
Read 4 tweets
May 26
Delhi High Court dismisses pleas moved by Rahul Gandhi, Sonia Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi Wadra, Aam Aadmi Party and other charitable trusts challenging the IT authorities' decision to transfer their tax assessments to the central circle.

#DelhiHighCourt #IncomeTax Image
A division bench of Justice Manmohan and Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma dismissed the petitions and observed that transfer was in accordance with law.

However, the court clarified that it did not examine the matter on merits.

#DelhiHighCourt #IncomeTax #RahulGandhi #SoniaGandhi
“The parties are free to raise their contentions before the appropriate statutory authority,” the bench added.

#DelhiHighCourt #IncomeTax #AamAadmiParty #RahulGandhi #SoniaGandhi #PriyankaGandhi
Read 5 tweets
May 26
YS Vivekananda Reddy murder case| #SupremeCourt vacation bench to hear petition filed by Suneetha Reddy, daughter of YS Vivekananda Reddy, challenging HC order granting conditional bail to accused T Gangi Reddy.

#SupremeCourtofIndia #SupremeCourt Image
Sr Adv Siddharth Luthra: CBI's affidavit states that HC order sets a bad precedent, comments on state investigation. SC while sending it back to HC said that it seems that state was dragging its feet and protecting this gentleman. That's the reason for default bail.
Justice Maheshwari: There is another case in which notice is to be issued.

#SupremeCourtofIndia #SupremeCourt
Read 6 tweets
May 26
#SupremeCourt vacation bench to hear TMC leader Abhishek Banerjee's plea challenging Calcutta HC order which had refused to direct CBI-ED to not interrogate him in West Bengal School Job Scam case and had imposed ₹25 Lakh fine on him.

#SupremeCourtofIndia
#AbhishekBanerjee Image
Dr AM Singhvi: Please see these orders. I won't take much time. This first order is of 24th April.

Justice JK Maheshwari: All this is over.

#AbhishekBanerjee #SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia
Justice Maheshwari: The court said that so far the investigation is concerned, we cannot interfere.

#AbhishekBanerjee #SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(