Andrew A. Michta Profile picture
Jun 9 • 9 tweets • 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
🧵Today I had an exchange with a European colleague that made me think about where #EU may be in a decade. Will the EU become an integrated autonomous pole in the emerging global system, even becoming a competitor to the US as my colleague suggested? I think not. Here is why: 1/9
The #EU still lacks attributes of a nation-state (at its core, it's a treaty-based organization), and a number of current variables defy EU's further integration. The external threat Europe faces today in the wake of the war in #Ukraine will prioritize defense and security. 2/9
The relatively benign external environment in which the EU evolved prior to 2022 is over (terrorism and the Balkan wars were not existential threats). Another factor mitigating against further centralization will be economic growth (high in the East but low overall in Europe).3/9
#EU will be increasingly confronted with a binary of further integration vs. defense. Member-states have already prioritized @NATO as the vehicle to ensure their security and defense; the #EU lacks a meaningful defense/security function and would still lack it if centralized. 4/9
Considering this demographic picture and the current high-threat security environment, I find it implausible that requisite resources will be diverted towards integration. The war in #Ukraine has shown that Europe is relying more, not less, on the United States for security. 5/9
Hence, I don't see much political space for bold #EU centralization projects; rather, Europe's path forward appears to be increasingly crisis management. The increasingly unstable regional and global security environment has already pushed those states most exposed to rearm. 6/9
As US competition with #China and #Russia heats up, I find it implausible that Europe will be able somehow stay out of the fray. European NATO countries are already invested in #Ukraine; the idea that by "de-risking" the EU can stay in the Chinese market strikes me as naive. 7/9
China continues to try to exploit European technology and PI, the more so as decoupling on the US side gathers speed. For 30yrs national security considerations were not paramount when it came to trade/investment. This era is over, and the EU is beginning to learn this lesson.8/9
In view of deteriorating security in Europe, I find it unlikely that further centralization (AKA "federalization") of the #EU will proceed; and if it does, that it will succeed. Defense is at its core a national-level effort, and that's where the focus and resources will go.9/End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew A. Michta

Andrew A. Michta Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @andrewmichta

Jun 8
🧵After the thread I posted here where I argued that rather than a new bipolarity the world is tracking for a period of protracted instability and conflict, where regional balancing will be key, I have been asked to explain my argument in more detail. So, a few key points: 1/10
First, we are in a period of considerable uncertainty about relative power distribution worldwide, especially when it comes to where the US and China are in relative terms. We can assess traditional power indices, but we still struggle to assess relative vulnerabilities. 2/10
Second, uncertainty about the relative power balance in the system encourages the key players to assume that we might have already entered a power-transition cycle, and to leverage this opportunity the principal powers become more prone to take risk, fueling conflict. 3/10
Read 10 tweets
Jun 3
🧵A few thoughts as I head back to the Oslo airport after the @Equinor-@nupinytt political risk forum on long-term consequences of the war in #Ukraine. First, I am even more convinced that this is a system-transforming war. Countries close to Russia get it (Norway included).1/10
Second, regardless of whether the war in #Ukraine ends soon or lasts for years, we are only in an early stage of this systemic transformation that will gain speed as de-globalization accelerates. The process will test the relative strength and expose weaknesses of states. 2/10
Beyond the traditional indicators of economic and military power, weakness in several areas will play an outsize role, as states mobilize and prepare for intense confrontation, possibly war. One key area will be the overall societal cohesion and resilience of countries. 3/10
Read 10 tweets
May 30
🧵As “de-risking” becomes the new buzzword for governments and corporations when it comes to our continued presence in the Chinese market, I’m increasingly convinced that we are looking for bandaids, rather than rethinking so-called “globalization” of the past three decades. 1/6
We have talked efficiency for decades, but never asked if this form of “globalization” is compatible with democratic governance. By ignoring the role of nations in the international system globalization’s advocates have lessened the accountability of elites in these matters. 2/6
For a time globalization lowered costs, but at what ultimate price?
No citizenry in a democracy would vote for what globalization brought them—their working-class communities gutted, their nat’l security endangered, and their country made dependent on an enemy foreign power 3/6
Read 6 tweets
May 29
🧵As I follow the developments in #Ukraine and the internal debates among @NATO allies, we are clearly for a challenging way ahead in the next decade. Regardless of the final settlement in UKR, the West must pursue a military plus political strategy to stop RUS aggression. 1/7
Absent some dramatic change in Moscow (unlikely), #Russia will continue to pose a threat to Europe's security and stability for the foreseeable future. Hence, Western resolve will be key when it comes to rearmament, deterrence and -- if need be -- defense going forward. 2/7
@NATO needs to complete its transition from "out-of-area" to fighting a near-peer war. That means focusing on collective territorial defense. We need full implementation of the DDA concept, and most of all real investments in rebuilding our weapons and munitions stocks. 3/7
Read 7 tweets
May 27
🧵This👇excellent piece by @bctallis and @JulianStoeckle made me think we should reflect on the larger question of what the emerging global disorder could look like in the coming decade. First, IMO the much touted concept of “multipolarity” is useless.1/7

ip-quarterly.com/en/whos-afraid…
To speak of multipolarity is to state the obvious but in a way take offers little analytical value. The key question is about what/who will structure the system thereby generating a modicum of stability. This is fundamentally a question about the distribution of hard power. 2/7
My work thus far has led me to conclude that rather than two “bounded orders” (US/Europe/democracies vs. China/Russia/dictatorships) we are facing a period of protracted instability, whereby regional power balances will be key to systemic stability/instability going forward. 3/7
Read 7 tweets
May 26
🧵It's increasingly clear that the world has entered a period of protracted instability, where the fundamentals of what has historically constituted state power are back front and center. As globalization unravels, we are re-learning the importance of economics and geography.1/8
After 30yrs of strategic slumber, we're rediscovering the importance of national cohesion, the ability to shape our region, and most of all military power. We're tracking for fierce state-on-state competition, and possibly a major war between great powers that could go global.2/8
I hold little hope that the so-called "complex interdependence" that the proponents of globalization touted for decades will stabilize the system, nor that it will restrain Russia and China from pressing to revise or replace, respectively, the US-led international system. 3/8
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(