Today #Amsterdam starts a transition experiment of 6 weeks that reclaims a car dominated street as public space.
There are already some important lessons about the importance of language. 1/🧵
The Weesperstraat has been seen as important link for car traffic to get in and out central Amsterdam for four decades.
Businesses fear for their accessibility & refer to the street as 'an artery'. Invoking the classic metaphor of cities as bodies, car traffic as blood . 2/🧵
This blinds us to why and how cities have always functioned as places for human interaction.
Instead of continuous pumping, a good city street constantly entices you to slow down, stop and linger to enjoy the public life around you.
3/🧵
Choosing to use the solidified language of traffic engineering to launch this experiment excludes many people and a diversity of important societal challenges: autonomy of children, rights of elderly, climate adaptation or loneliness.
Instead, we hear the status quo. 4/🧵
All status quo parties refer to the experiment as a 'cut' of the urban mobility system. But then we forget that the actual 'cut' was made in the 1970s.
Before activists stopped it, planners demolished the Jewish neighbourhood (Weesperbuurt) for the Modern City. 5/🧵
Instead of 'cutting' the mobility system, we are facing the wounds that were made 50 years ago.
We are not CUTTING roads, we are STITCHING neighbourhoods.
This is what the Weesperstraat once looked like!
6/🧵
Academic studies show a clear and consistent outcome of these kinds of interventions.
Unlike model projections and unlike the limited imagination of the status quo, 'traffic hell' does not materialize. Instead, traffic evaporates.
Traffic is not like WATER,
but like GAS.
7/🧵
And think of air quality, noise reduction, stress relieve, safety effects, children's freedom, green space effects that will benefit the silent majority!
So, when will we learn to escape the limits of the language that created the problems?
Day 2. The traffic chaos expected by some didn't materialize according to @ANWB. A bit more traffic on alternative corridors, but no effect on the ring road.
11/🧵
The peace and quiet at one of the squares along the corridor is striking.
12/🧵
~Jonas Daniël Meijerplein by @zeeger:
Day 2: The temporary pocket-park on the #Weesperstraat is taking shape!
13/🧵
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why should children have a Right to the Street?
❤ Health?
💨 Emissions?
👫 Access to friends?
🏘 Exploration & attachment?
👥 Children’s citizenship?
Whatever the reason, people want change and will show it this weekend across Europe kidsonbike.org.
Children across the world have lost their right to roam in just four generations. There are many reasons for this, but for a large part this can be traced back to how we design our streets.
We optimized our streets to offer the Homo Economicus optimal vehicular throughput and comfortable parking. The safety and dignity of our children became secondary, at best.
We discipline them, give them responsibility for their own safety. We tell them to not be distracted!
Dutch individuals and companies collectively own 8.7 million private cars. With 17.4 million people and 8 million households that equates to 500 cars
per 1,000 inhabitants, or an average of just over 1 car per household. [2]
This number has been rapidly growing and is expected to grow even further. In the last 30 years this went from 0,8 tot 1,1 car per household. [3]
It is not easy to fix the historical mistake to let cars dominate public space. But #Catharijnesingel (Utrecht) shows that cities can heal from the inflicted wounds.
Radical change is possible. But it takes strong leadership.
Design for the city you want to be.
Not for the traffic you have (or that modelers 'predict')
Connect the dots:
😱 Danish🇩🇰 kids cycle less far (-25%), less often (-32%) in last 10 years
🚙 Proportion of kids cycling to school dropped 30%. Car journeys doubled/tripled
🤸♀️ Only 26% gets enough physical exercise
⛑ Helmets became the norm