Assaad Razzouk Profile picture
Jun 20 12 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Every once a while, a momentous environmental law comes into force. That's the case of the EU Deforestation Regulation

This is the most consequential anti-deforestation law in history

THREAD #deforestation #climate #biodiversity
The EU Deforestation Regulation mandates extensive due diligence for operators and traders dealing with products derived from

> Cattle
> Cocoa
> Coffee
> Oil palm
> Rubber
> Soya
> Wood

2/12

whitecase.com/insight-alert/…
Non-compliance is very costly

Fines for companies caught importing, trading or selling banned products will total up to at least 4% of annual EU revenues. Using Nestlé as an example, this could mean a fine of about $800m

3/12

ft.com/content/49b48d…
But possibly even more important is the fact that over time, case law around the EU Biodiversity Regulations and and biodiversity loss may give rise to the possibility of directors’ liability for breaching their duties

4/12
The EU Deforestation Regulation is innovative and tough: The burden of proof for imports, and showing they are deforestation-free, is on traders and EU buyers and not on producing countries where law enforcement may be patchy (and I am being polite)

5/12
The 7 commodities required to be deforestation-free in order to be sold on the EU market or exported from it must be covered by a "due diligence statement" and produced in accordance with applicable local laws

6/12
Buyers and traders marketing these products in the EU (or exporting them from the EU) must:

> Conduct extensive diligence, down to the geolocation of all plots of land where they were produced
> Time-stamp the production

7/12
> Collect detailed information that demonstrates the products comply with the regulation
> Establish and maintain a due diligence system of procedures and measures to ensure relevant products comply
> Mitigate risks by carrying out independent surveys/audits

8/12
> Carry out a risk assessment in relation to each product to ascertain the risk of non-compliance, including human rights and whether indigenous rights were respected

9/12
In short, the law forces companies to clean up their supply chains, by holding them responsible for where they get their commodities from and ensuring suppliers aren’t violating applicable human rights, labor and environmental standards in the exporting country and the EU

10/12
This will result in a tsunami or consequences in countries exporting, for example, beef, leather, furniture, chocolate, palm oil or coffee to the EU - and meaningfully and forcefully fight-back against deforestation

11/12

carbonbrief.org/qa-what-does-t… Image
Gone are the incentives producers, traders and companies across the supply chain of these commodities had to [turn a blind eye to][not give a toss about the] associated environmental, biodiversity, human rights and climate catastrophes

[END] more reading: cdn.cdp.net/cdp-production…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Assaad Razzouk

Assaad Razzouk Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AssaadRazzouk

Jun 9
The renewables revolution is unfolding live, fast and furiously.

"It's exponential, global, and this decade": look at the data and do the math

THREAD
Building block #1: Mineral extraction for a renewable system (43 mt/y) is 360 times less than for fossil fuels (over 15,000 mt/y) Image
Building block #2: Exponential change is all around us Image
Read 16 tweets
May 17
After 27 years of UN climate talks, Big Oil finally succeeded in completing its hijacking of the annual meeting of 198 countries to act on climate

@UNFCCC should be going nuts about it and acting (fat chance, probably)

Top 10 reasons why the hijacking is complete:

🧵 #COP28
1 For the first time ever, an oil chief - and in this case no less than the CEO of a major oil company - is appointed president of the COP28 climate summit

politico.eu/article/cop28-…
2 The COP28 team is marshalling a new alliance of the oil and gas sector which of course is "forgetting" to include in its pretend-decarbonizing goals the bulk of emissions from fossil fuels

ft.com/content/0d8b8b… #greenwashing
Read 13 tweets
Mar 13
Saudi Aramco just posted $161b in "profits" and is going to "increase production capacity to 13m barrels/day"

Its scope 3 emissions, however, are 1,600m tons of CO2. Its charge for this environmental destruction should have been, at $100/ton, $160b, wiping out its profits

1/n
That's before ANY charge for environmental destruction other than emissions, of which they have an enormous amount

2/n
Big Oil profits only exist because environmental destruction isn't quantified or accounted for. Today, destroying the environment and polluting free of charge are simply a disclosure and reporting issue: Big Oil executives and shareholders are recompensated for destruction

3/n
Read 7 tweets
Feb 3
Some context around the $200 billion in net profits just 5 oil companies made in 2022

$200bn isn't just obscene, it's also wrong: these companies all lost money. We just can't "see it" because they don't pay for their wanton destruction of the environment

THREAD
Big Oil profits exist because environmental destruction isn't quantified or accounted for. Today, destroying the environment and polluting free of charge are simply a disclosure and reporting issue: Big Oil executives and shareholders are recompensated for destruction

2/n
ExxonMobil tells us its emissions were the equivalent of 690 million tons of CO2. The social cost of carbon – in other words, how much damage in dollars one ton of CO2 emitted into the atmosphere causes – is estimated to be anywhere from $50 to $200. Let’s suppose it is $100

3/n
Read 19 tweets
Jan 30
The Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero is a complete joke and provides cover to banks frying the planet while pretending to go "net zero"

A new report published by 13 NGOs comprehensively proves the point

THREAD
The Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero presents itself as "a global coalition of leading financial institutions committed to accelerating the decarbonization of the economy" blah bah blah

As a matter of fact, they appear committed to exactly the opposite aim

2/n
Top 10 climate destroying banks: largest fossil fuel expanders from joining NZBA

1 Citigroup $31b in climate destruction finance
2 Bank of America $23b
3 MUFJ $23b
4 Mizuho $19b
5 JP Morgan $17b
6 HSBC $12b
7 SMBC $12b
8 Morgan Stanley $11b
9 RBC $10b
10 Deutsche $9b

3/n
Read 10 tweets
Dec 27, 2022
My animal of the year (including humans): Insects, which we are in the process of wiping out

If you drive, have you noticed that many fewer insects crash into your windshield compared to a few years ago? Sadly, this has a name: the ‘windshield phenomenon’

🧵
This should be front-page headline news every day. We like to think we run the world, but we are not the world’s ultimate controllers. The ultimate controllers, the tiny things that enforce our world order, are insects

Yet we are in the midst of a massive insect apocalypse

2/n
As we continue to transform - and destroy - Earth, insects are declining at an unprecedented rate of perhaps 2% a year from deforestation, pesticides, pollution and climate change

3/n
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(