How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
1. First, the RSTP restricts free movement as it imposes “considerable legal risks, unforeseeable & potentially very high financial risks as well as major sporting risks on those players & clubs wishing to employ them which [...] impede international transfers of those players”
https://twitter.com/guardian_sport/status/1840286527349502041This case is certainly less sexy than #SuperLeague, but there is little doubt in my mind (since a while) that it can have a much deeper & immediate impact on the whole ecosystem of football.
https://x.com/Ant1Duval/status/1572946384923525121
https://twitter.com/Ant1Duval/status/17852317184477884561. Szpunar considers that Article 17 RSTP constitutes a restriction by object because:
In general, the decision of the #CJEU confirms the ruling of the General Court endorsing the EC decision and invalidates it only on the point on which #ISU had prevailed in first instance (the CAS arbitration clause).
https://twitter.com/ant1duval/status/16786765690808647691. Is the ECtHR competent to decide a case involving a South-African national (#Semenya) challenging the regulations of a private entity based in Monaco (@WorldAthletics) before an international arbitral tribunal (#CAS) ? Or is the link to Switzerland too tenuous? (Paras 103-112)
https://twitter.com/EUCourtPress/status/1633759259312771072First an element of context, AG Szpunar is not any AG at the Court, but the 'First Advocate General'. His Opinion comes after the much noted and commented Opinion of AG Rantos in the #Superleague case.
@NadiaBernaz @TaraVanHo @KlaasEller @mouetteobscure @A__Beckers @ioanniskamp @ProfSuryaDeva @VirginieRouas @clairerabright @profsarahj (and hopefully many others), it might be of interest to you and I look forward to your feedback!
https://twitter.com/ArbitralduSport/status/14732795171081953331. Unfortunately, the only interesting bits are in the financial statements at the end of the document. Even though they are not going into great details, they are providing interesting information about the economic management of the CAS.
https://twitter.com/GlobalAthleteHQ/status/14403326018021253221. #CAS is a crucial player in sports governance, it whitewashes legally speaking the decisions of international SGBs. Once a CAS award confirmed a decision of an SGB, the latter gains in authority and becomes extremely difficult to challenge elsewhere (see #Pechstein odyssey).
https://twitter.com/lemonde_sport/status/12287483521011916811. This is the beginning of a (potentially decade long) judicial journey, not the end. Yet, the #CAS will decide (this summer?) the fate of #ManCity in the short term (e.g. for the 2020/2021 season).
1. The #SFT reminds us that its control of #CAS awards is narrow. Hence, it orders interim measures only if it is ‘very likely’ that an appellant will prevail.
1. In short, what is interesting in the award is actually also what the #CAS forgot to mentioned in its press release, the core of #IAAF’s winning case turns on the concepts of ‘biological males’ & ‘sports sex’.