How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
https://twitter.com/shipinsight/status/1330826247774097410The ban was approved during the virtual #MEPC75 meeting despite widespread opposition from Indigenous groups, NGOs. shipinsight.com/articles/imos-…
https://twitter.com/HighNorthNews/status/1330773821666832384The @IMOHQ regulation, however, has repeatedly been criticized by environmental organizations @CleanArctic as too weak due to a number of loopholes, which will allow #Arctic states to continue using HFO until mid-2029.
https://twitter.com/BBCScienceNews/status/1329887403490873345Note: "environmentalists" =@CleanArctic: @foe_us @TheAltaiProject @Bellona_no @gronomstilling @OurOcean @SeasAtRisk @ArniFinnsson @EIAEnvironment @WWF_Arctic @cleanaircatf @transenv @ecodes @standearth @NABU_de @alaskawild @Greenpeace @surfridereurope @ArcticMission @iccinet
Antarctic waters are protected by stringent regulations, including a ban on heavy oil fuel (HFO) adopted in 2011, even though no cargo moves through the turbulent southern waters. For the Arctic, the rules have been looser. reuters.com/article/shippi…
"Ships will be banned from burning or using heavy fuel oil (HFO) in Arctic waters under a newly agreed regulation, but with loopholes giving most polluters a pass until 2029." climatechangenews.com/2020/11/20/un-…
.@CleanArctic slammed the decision by @IMOHQ to approve a ban ridden with of loopholes on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil in the Arctic (HFO), saying that it would leave the Arctic, its Indigenous communities and its wildlife facing risk of a HFO spill for another decade
Current draft of Ban “would allow 74% of HFO-fuelled ships to keep using HFO in the #Arctic” and would result in a reduction of HFO carried of just 30% and a cut in black carbon emissions of only 5%." @BryanComerPhD @TheICCT shipinsight.com/articles/mepc-… @IMOHQ @shipinsight #mepc75