Clean Arctic Alliance Profile picture
We're taking action to protect the Arctic, its wildlife & its peoples from the impacts of shipping.
Nov 23, 2020 16 tweets 13 min read
Environmentalist NGO @CleanArctic has slammed the decision by @IMOHQ to approve a ban which it says is ridden with of loopholes on use & carriage of HFO in the #Arctic. #mep75 The ban was approved during the virtual #MEPC75 meeting despite widespread opposition from Indigenous groups, NGOs. shipinsight.com/articles/imos-…
Nov 23, 2020 18 tweets 18 min read
On Friday, "an IMO sub-committee approved proposed Arctic heavy fuel oil ban. Environmental advocates & indigenous peoples’ groups criticized the ban as insufficient & called on Arctic states to pass stronger regulation on their own. "
@malte_humpert @IMOHQ @ArcticCouncil #mepc75 The @IMOHQ regulation, however, has repeatedly been criticized by environmental organizations @CleanArctic as too weak due to a number of loopholes, which will allow #Arctic states to continue using HFO until mid-2029.

highnorthnews.com/en/imo-and-arc… #mepc75
Nov 20, 2020 14 tweets 15 min read
The @ImohW decision has been condemned by environmentalists as a "massive missed opportunity".
Heavy fuel oil (HFO) is widely used to power commercial ships. HFO's have been banned in Antarctic waters since 2011 over fears that oil spills could cause pollution. Note: "environmentalists" =@CleanArctic: @foe_us @TheAltaiProject @Bellona_no @gronomstilling @OurOcean @SeasAtRisk @ArniFinnsson @EIAEnvironment @WWF_Arctic @cleanaircatf @transenv @ecodes @standearth @NABU_de @alaskawild @Greenpeace @surfridereurope @ArcticMission @iccinet
Nov 20, 2020 10 tweets 7 min read
#breaking: UN @IMOHQ approves ban on heavy ship fuel in #Arctic in a move criticised by green groups (@CleanArctic) which said loopholes will allow many vessels to keep sailing without enough regulatory control. reuters.com/article/shippi… @Reuters THREAD 👇#mepc75 Image Antarctic waters are protected by stringent regulations, including a ban on heavy oil fuel (HFO) adopted in 2011, even though no cargo moves through the turbulent southern waters. For the Arctic, the rules have been looser. reuters.com/article/shippi…
Nov 20, 2020 15 tweets 11 min read
Thread: UN shipping body @IMOHQ approves Arctic heavy fuel oil ‘ban’, delayed for a decade climatechangenews.com/2020/11/20/un-… @izzygerretsen @ClimateHome Ships will be banned from b... "Ships will be banned from burning or using heavy fuel oil (HFO) in Arctic waters under a newly agreed regulation, but with loopholes giving most polluters a pass until 2029." climatechangenews.com/2020/11/20/un-…
Nov 20, 2020 27 tweets 20 min read
#Breaking: @IMOHQ & Arctic States Slammed for Endorsing Continued Arctic Pollution by approving "outrageous" weak heavy fuel oil ban bit.ly/38ZP40s #mepc75 Image .@CleanArctic slammed the decision by @IMOHQ to approve a ban ridden with of loopholes on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil in the Arctic (HFO), saying that it would leave the Arctic, its Indigenous communities and its wildlife facing risk of a HFO spill for another decade
Nov 18, 2020 11 tweets 12 min read
Via @shipinsight: #MEPC75 must review #Arctic HFO ban, but #Russia holds the key writes @paulgunton1 shipinsight.com/articles/mepc-… @IMOHQ Image Current draft of Ban “would allow 74% of HFO-fuelled ships to keep using HFO in the #Arctic” and would result in a reduction of HFO carried of just 30% and a cut in black carbon emissions of only 5%." @BryanComerPhD @TheICCT shipinsight.com/articles/mepc-… @IMOHQ @shipinsight #mepc75