Sayeth @Dartmouth: "we need the SAT to help find smart poor kids." Yet since dropping the requirement:

👉% of enrollees qualifying for need-based aid is unchanged

👉Amount of aid per recipient, scaled by tuition, increased 10%

What's the real story? 🧵
nytimes.com/2024/02/05/bri… @dartmouth Preliminaries: all the data shown here are derived directly from information @Dartmouth submits annually to the Federal Government. (Common Data Set). See it all for yourself here:


Test-optional applies to applicants matriculating 2021 or later.dartmouth.edu/oir/data-repor…

Much respect for @DLeonhardt's journalism, but this thread is going on my quant syllabus as an example of how to mislead (not lie! but mislead) with statistics. SAT/ACT are way less of a deal than is implied here.

Strap in, because we're going into the weeds on this thread...

https://twitter.com/DLeonhardt/status/1744079004011790681

@DLeonhardt Here David says “the relationship between test scores and college grades… is strong.” And golly what a steep line!

The problem is that the strength of the relationship isn’t measured by the steepness of the line, but how closely data points hew to it.

https://x.com/DLeonhardt/status/1744079481722085825?s=20

To appreciate @nellgluckman’s article about @OppInsights and elitism, it’s helpful to understand an important feature of the econ ecosystem:

There’s incredibly little 💰💰 in it, and a large share of what’s there is doled out by oligarchs. A 🧵...

chronicle.com/article/does-r… @nellgluckman @OppInsights By money I mean research support. Here’s a helpful chart from @AAAS. The Federal government spends about $75B on research each year via @NSF, @NIH, and other agencies. Funding for social science barely registers on this chart…

Ever wanted to change state law? As @UW's faculty legislative rep, that's part of my job description. Let me walk you through a case study.

Here's the text of Washington's pass-the-harasser law. Can you see the blind spot? Let's shine a light on it and talk about how to fix it. @UW RCW 28B.112.080(1)(a) requires job applicants to disclose whether a prior *employer* has substantiated accusations of misconduct. But as recent discussion on #econtwitter has emphasized, not all harassment involves a prof and a student/employee at the same university.

Do you have tenure? Hope to get it someday? Pick your nose up from the grindstone for a moment, read this article, and then come back to this thread for some tips on how to monitor the financial health of your employer.

chronicle.com/article/tenure… Tenure is designed to insulate scholars from risk. The risk of taking on a bold research project that just doesn't work out. The risk of saying something that is politically unpopular but true.

There's one type of risk it can't insulate you from: institutional financial risk.

Here's some data on 2 PhD programs @DukeU.

Roughly equal in size.

@usnews rankings and yield rates (% of admitted students who accept the offer) suggest the bio program is more prestigious.

The econ program receives nearly 10x more applications.

The Econ Bottleneck: a 🧵 The number of doctoral degrees awarded in the US has expanded significantly over the past 3 decades. Computer science degrees have tripled. Biology and math/stats degrees more than doubled.

Econ has had one of the most anemic growth rates: 39%. Less than soc, poli sci, history!

For the small number of people who are not totally sick of #minimumwage threads, let me walk you through some of the @UW team's findings for #Seattle now that they've cleared peer review (conditionally accepted, AEJ:EP).

A lot of them are packed into this one picture. This isn't the analysis that used Synthetic Seattle and counted up the number of jobs paying under some threshold, except it couldn't count jobs at multi-location firms.

This is a longitudinal analysis of individual workers working for low pay in Washington as of early 2015.

Hello everyone arguing about the #minimumwage! Someday I'll post a thread about the evidence our @UW team compiled in Seattle.

Today let's talk about hours.

Raise the wage on most low-paying jobs & workers still don't have enough to live on. Because they can't get enough hours. The graph above is based on data from WA: one of only 4 states that collects systematic data on hours worked. It shows information for anyone earning under $11/hr in 2014-15, when the minimum wage was no more than $9.47.

The data have some important limitations:

Q: Why is rent so high? (median US renter paid 14% of income for rent in 1960, 24% by 2017.)

That’s the topic of my new paper with @evansuw alum Alanna Williams, presented this morning @nberpubs #NBERSI2020.

Want the answer (or at least a partial one)? Follow along! (1/11) First some clues to the mystery: this is more a story of rents rising fast, rather than incomes falling. Renter incomes track inflation well, but sometime around 1970 rents started accelerating ahead of inflation. Had rents just tracked inflation they’d be about 50% lower today.

Here, #econtwitter, is a photo (replete with San Diego Marriott poolside lounge chair backdrop) of the AEA budget for FY 2020. I picked it up at the sparsely attended business meeting at #ASSA2020.

Although printed in black, there's some serious red ink. Let's explore. The AEA operating budget was in the black five years ago. This year, they expect to spend $1.23 for every $1 in operating revenue. What gives?

Revenues (+7% in nominal terms 2015-2020) are not keeping up with expenses (+35.5%).

In light of the recent suicides of Alan Krueger and Martin Weitzman, economists & other professionals at risk of aging might find insight in this recent letter penned by Princeton professor emeritus Avinash Dixit.

Thread follows. Dixit's letter was written in response to @ArthurBrooks' recent @TheAtlantic essay, which is itself a must read for any professional at risk of aging:
theatlantic.com/magazine/archi…

ICYMI @NickKristof found "reason for hope" in a groundbreaking experimental study by @OppInsights. Go read if you haven't, then come back here for a contrarian thread: in broader context, this is a desert island of hope in a rising sea of despair.
nytimes.com/2019/08/03/opi… @NickKristof @OppInsights The @OppInsights study showed that offering assistance to Seattle-area housing voucher recipients made them about 40 percentage points more likely to use their vouchers to rent an apartment in "high opportunity" neighborhoods.

Link to the study here:
opportunityinsights.org/wp-content/upl…

Six weeks ago, I invited the 9 candidates for AEA leadership positions to offer statements on pressing issues in the economics profession, including diversity/inclusion & the publication process.

Response rate, as of today: zero.

There is, of course, an economic explanation... Economics teaches us that producers profit from imposing scarcity of their product, restricting output and imposing barriers to entry. They gain, would-be competitors and consumers lose.

This is what economists preach. It is also what they practice.

My thoughts on academic publishing are heavily influenced by the four years I spent co-editing the Berkeley Electronic Journal in Economic Analysis & Policy (BEJEAP).

Theoretically it still exists today, but it bears little resemblance to what it once was. A brief tale. One of several journals established as a brainchild of @ProfAaronEdlin about 20 years ago, I signed on in 2008 to work alongside some great colleagues including @orianabandiera, @deanyang, @ProfFionasm, @stevepuller, Gary Solon, Don Fullerton, Eric Zitzewitz, Nolan Miller...

A few (more) thoughts on the evolution of scholarly publishing, abetted by the metrics computed by the @eigenfactor project.

Authors supply content, journals demand it. Journals publish when quality exceeds a certain threshold.

What happens when supply increases? Journals can respond by holding the threshold constant and publishing more, or raising the bar for publication. Or somewhere on the continuum between the two.

In economics over the past half-century, the dominant choice has been to raise the bar. Why?

Two words: impact factor.

Dear candidates for AEA elected office (@kearney_melissa, @drlisadcook, @OS_Mitchell, @MattGentzkow et al):

I'd like to instigate a series of candidate forums so that you might inform #econtwitter where you stand on important issues.

I will reach out to those not on @twitter. While welcoming suggestions for important topics, and recognizing that inclusivity, gender, and race belong among them. I'd like to start with the state of publishing in the discipline.

Some basic stylized facts to start the discussion:

Rank-and-file economists don't know it yet, but the next president-elect of the American Economic Association has been selected.

Or at least the only individual whose name will be printed on the ballot has been selected.

Here's the story, #econtwitter... AEA by-laws charge a nominating committee with presenting 2+ candidates for president-elect to the Executive Committee no later than April 30th. The 2 committees then hold what resembles a papal conclave, trading the Sistine Chapel for a meeting room at the Hyatt Regency O'Hare.

"Brilliant answers to irrelevant questions: a game for anti-social social scientists"

Is that what economists are playing now?

An epistemological concern with roots as old as the discipline itself.

And our thread for today.

https://twitter.com/christopherruhm/status/1075960649568714752

We'll start off with enough links to keep you busy all weekend:
@christopherruhm's recent paper nber.org/papers/w25320
@oren_cass on the politicization of research nationalaffairs.com/publications/d…
A critique in a journal lots of non-economists read: nature.com/articles/d4158…

If you started a Ph.D. program in economics this fall, your chances of proceeding directly to an academic job (excluding postdocs, but including non-tenure track positions such as lecturers) is approximately...

13%

Is that a market failure? That's our thread topic for today. First, on the numbers. @NSF conducts a survey of earned doctorates each year, with very high response rates. Of 1,237 economics doctorate recipients in the US, 274 (22%) reported a first job at a US academic institution.

ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19301/…

Economics has become the laughingstock of academic publication. Common question asked by scholars in almost any other field: "It takes you *how long* to get a paper published?"

How do we fix it?

Some suggestions... Initial review: ratchet up expectations for peer reviewers. It does not take four weeks to read a manuscript and write a report. Conditional on no desk rejection, economics journals take weeks longer to reach a first decision.