How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
https://twitter.com/ECHR_CEDH/status/17276256640129682581/ Let me start with more miscellaneous aspects: My insistence not to speak of “judicial reforms” to describe violations of the RoL seems to have gained ground with Court referring to “the so-called “reform of the judiciary” in 🇵🇱” (I knew by then this would be excellent ruling!)
https://twitter.com/ProfPech/status/16768758754747105281/ To begin with, one may regret that Judge Tuleya did not benefit from Rule 39 which the ECtHR did not start relying upon to protect 🇵🇱 judges from arbitrary proceedings before PiS 🦘courts until 2022 & which 🇵🇱 authorities are also now openly violating
https://twitter.com/RULEOFLAWpl/status/1667804359692877824Compare the COMM's legally & reality-disconnected diagnosis re PL (in part *unconstitutional*) law of Jan 2023 with (correct) assessment of @coe Committee of Ministers
https://twitter.com/ProfPech/status/16657095641661317121/ Background: This ECJ judgment concerns Poland’s ruling party’s #MuzzleLaw, a grossly unconstitutional and rushed piece of legislation which aimed to (and was used to) punish Polish judges for applying Polish and EU and ECHR #ruleoflaw requirements verfassungsblog.de/open-letter-to…
https://twitter.com/ForumulR/status/1633052418437988353With respect, however, the ECJ has delivered absurd/reality disconnected judgment in Noble Bank which means, in practice, that ECJ has stopped assessing whether referring court is composed of judges or irregularly appointed individuals & delegated this EU job to ECtHR in practice
https://twitter.com/ProfPech/status/15326952290353397771/ Before getting into details of it, quick quiz Q: How many times is the rule of law mentioned in 239p-long annexes to Commision proposal for Council implementing decision detailing the Polish recovery and resilience plan?
https://twitter.com/Zabudowska/status/14850103486169210931/ Judge Paweł Juszczyszyn: First 🇵🇱 judge suspended in Feb 2020 for applying ECJ ruling in AK (formally nullified later by unlawfully appointed members of unlawful disciplinary chamber). Still not reinstated following repeated (criminal) refusals to obey several 🇵🇱 & 🇪🇺 rulings
https://twitter.com/ProfPech/status/14605959389012459571/ 20 November 2017: ECJ (second) order in Case C-441/17 Commission v Poland (Białowieża Forest)
https://twitter.com/RULEOFLAWpl/status/1458041759200591874This gave @GoodLobbyProfs no choice but to pen another statement of support. One can only hope @vonderleyen @VeraJourova @dreynders have already done so privately & are also busy working on new Art 258 actions, Art 260 referral to ECJ + activation of RoL Conditionality Regulation
https://twitter.com/RULEOFLAWpl/status/1424639436760002563Let’s start with ECJ order = one which demands *IMMEDIATE* compliance/suspension of relevant provisions from day 1/until ruling on merits + imposes 1-month deadline to inform EU Comm of measures *ADOPTED* to comply with order failing what daily penalty payment can be requested 1/
https://twitter.com/rumeliobserver/status/1423580083747500032What is possible in the short term at the very least is a daily penalty payment re non-compliance with ECJ order in Case C-204/21 R:
https://twitter.com/EUCourtPress/status/1394564696632610819Context: Romania under previous rule of corrupt autocrat Dragnea faced abrupt backsliding with multiple legislative changes aimed to annihilate judicial independence. Today's ECJ judgment is connected to these legislative changes following 6 PR requests
https://twitter.com/JudgesSsp/status/13829929468705095681/ Duda violated 🇵🇱/🇪🇺 law by appointing individuals to CECPA in Oct 2018 "despite the fact that an appeal had been brought against" relevant resolution & "its execution had been stayed" & "despite the fact that the proceedings before the [SAC] had not been concluded” (para 7)
https://twitter.com/EUCourtPress/status/13666782621817487361/ This limitation notwithstanding, judgment is extremely welcome as strongest confirmation to date that EUMS must respect EU Law in particular when it comes to "enactment of national rules governing the process of appointing judges” + connected rules governing judicial review
https://twitter.com/ProfPech/status/1340223655620599809@RULEOFLAWpl This is an important AG opinion which also for the 1st time mentions *and* makes use of Poland's Supreme Court resolution of 23 January 2020 which held the bogus "DC" not to constitute a court
https://twitter.com/EuroParlPress/status/1339173841004847107Step-by-step overview of new general (#ruleoflaw) conditionality mechanism for protection of #EUbudget
https://twitter.com/alemannoEU/status/1336737375750397952Para 1 of draft conclusions: 2nd sentence is legally wrong/poorly drafted. Art 7 not only procedure to address "breaches" of Art 2 TEU values as already established by ECJ re Polish Sup Court purge (both item under Art 7 and subject of successful infringement action in 6198/18)
https://twitter.com/EulawLive/status/1324613243634126848Title of not yet adopted Regulation (at @EUCouncil's insistence) no longer mentions #ruleoflaw & concept of "generalised deficiencies" with reference instead to "a general regime of conditionality". Cosmetic rebranding to assuage autocrats or bad omen? Let’s continue to find out
https://twitter.com/EUCourtPress/status/1313384276168257536@ceu @EU_Commission This ECJ ruling will no doubt be mentioned in the 2021 #ruleoflaw country report...