Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
"Dr" Nick Holmes 💚🦆🇪🇺💉🇺🇦
@TheHandLab
neuroscientist/birds/b.335ppm CO2 socials: https://t.co/h20eLcFjkb websites: https://t.co/tykI9oZ7f7 https://t.co/BIWLyJ5Hbb https://t.co/h5eW9UXl9v
Sep 4, 2021 • 30 tweets • 10 min read
hello #psychology #stats twitter!

a while ago i promised some graphs on why #removing #outliers using a simple cut-off (eg, >2SDs) is a #bad idea

so that I can sleep at night again, here they are

tldr: DON'T (blindly) USE FIXED OUTLIER CUT-OFFS LIKE >2SD. EVER.

1/15 some twitter background:
2/15


Sep 3, 2021 • 6 tweets • 4 min read
this #episode was a real pleasure!

Valentine Delrue @valentinedelrue & Sean Devine from @jtrialerror talking about their journal & project to make #science less fragmented, more open, honest & transparent. 22mins; links below...

#scicomm #journal #OpenScience #errorbarpodcast theerrorbar.com/?e=16
Apr 1, 2021 • 60 tweets • 31 min read
It's Good Friday.

As a sacrifice to Science, I'm going to criticise every single paper I've ever written, one tweet at a time.

Stay tuned..!

#ImAVeryNaughtyBoy Paper #1: Holmes & Spence 2004 @xmodal

Criticism: A non-systematic review of selected papers, no assessment of study quality, bias, or effect sizes. The only novel thing in this paper was a long, harsh critique of Iriki et al. (1996)

#SelfCriticism

doi.org/10.1007/s10339…