Thread 🧵🧵🧵
The Redpills of our Identity:

Who are we?
Where are we?
When are we?
What are these remnants?
Why was history hidden?

Grok AI says COVID vaccines are “absolutely safe and effective.”

Meanwhile, other bots are literally telling people how to end their lives.

This isn’t a glitch—it’s part of the plan. A look inside the mindset of the people designing the systems that will soon decide what you’re allowed to say, believe, and do.

Now, those same people want to guide you through mass unemployment with “universal high income.”

So ask yourself: is this really who you want in charge of your money, your voice, and your children’s future?

🧵 THREAD

To give you a brief overview, the UN, WEF, international bankers, and technocrats are planning to collapse the world as we know it through a planned demolition.

Their goal is to rebuild into the digital age. You may have heard it called the Great Reset, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, or the Golden Age—all the names that are far more palatable than the coming reality, which will see everyone locked in a digital prison of 24/7 surveillance, monitoring, and slavery. And it will indeed be slavery, because after the AI takeover, humans will be left with no work, no money, and no purpose.

The proposed solution to this is “free” money. A universal basic income—or universal high income, as Elon Musk calls it. It will be a nominal amount of digital currency paid to you by the powers that be, as long as you comply with what they tell you. If their plan succeeds, you won’t be able to survive without their digital currency. That is their plan and they’ve clearly outlined it in multiple texts.

@zeeemedia reported on this in depth two years ago. You can watch that report here. It’s vitally important.

So, how when can we expect this plan to come to fruition? What would you say if we told you it’s already here?

Today, we’re digging into the worldwide rollout of universal basic income, what that means for humanity, and what you can do to prepare and fight back.

Tonight’s report opened with a look back at Andrew Yang’s push for universal basic income (UBI).

In 2019 and 2020, the public wasn’t ready to embrace something so sweeping. But once technocrats gained serious influence over global policy and the digital future, the landscape changed. What was once dismissed as a fringe idea has quietly moved into the mainstream, reshaped as part of a broader global transformation.

That shift became easier to grasp after hearing how many tech elites envision humanity’s future. Yuval Noah Harari, for example, once said people will be drugged and distracted because their lives will be “meaningless.” Remarks like that revealed how the architects of the coming system view the average person—not as empowered individuals, but as managed subjects.

The pandemic years only intensified that picture. What had long been called a conspiracy—including the Great Reset—became visible in plain sight, embedded in the proposals and language of global institutions. A “mass awakening” followed.

One idea connected it all: digital ID. Once identity is tied to behavior and access to money, control isn’t imposed—it’s embedded. The result is a shift toward a social-credit-style model, where participation depends on compliance.

Watch the full report: 👇
rumble.com/v72nhmy-lockst…

#DSA fine on @X :

1. A legal expression of European strategic sovereignty

It operationalizes the idea that Europe will set its own rules for its information space—even if Washington screams “censorship.”

cc: @elonmusk @JDVance

2. A practical tool of liberal self-defense

It doesn’t ban speech

it forces honesty of labels, visibility of money, and access for independent research—all preconditions for any defense against information warfare, whether from Russia, China, or U.S..

3. A trigger for U.S.–Europe rift

The more consistently the EU uses the DSA, the more Trump’s circle will point to it as “proof” that Europe is the enemy. That pushes Europe further toward the strategic sovereignty path:

U.S. as a volatile actor, not as the core of the West

We got one last week before the #FantasyFootball playoffs - let’s make it count 😤

Here’s our FULL LIST of starts and sits for Week 14 🏈

ALL CAPS = FAVORITE START/SIT ⬇️⬇️⬇️

#Seahawks at #Falcons:

Start:
Sam Darnold
Bijan Robinson
Kenneth Walker (flex)
JSN
Kyle Pitts (startable)

Sit:
Kirk Cousins
Zach Charbonnet (TD dependent)
Tyler Allgeier
Darnell Mooney (desperate flex)
Rashid Shaheed
AJ Barner

#Steelers at #Ravens:

Start:
Lamar Jackson (lower floor)
Derrick Henry
Jaylen Warren
Kenneth Gainwell (flex)
DK Metcalf (flex)
Zay Flowers (flex)
Mark Andrews

Sit:
Pat Friermuth
Jonnu Smith
Isaiah Likely

Why has the housing market been frozen since 2022?

Because the cost to buy a house with a mortgage (green) vaulted way above the a) cost to rent and b) the mortgage cost for existing owners.

The net result is that few people have a financial incentive to move. Cheaper to stay renting, cheaper to stay in current house/mortgage.

But - one interesting trend we are beginning to notice is the mortgage payment for existing owners (orange) is now growing faster than rent.

This is reversed from the post-pandemic period. Where sub-3% mortgages and still cheap taxes/insurance made for a very low cost to own for existing mortgage holders.

Now - taxes and insurance are up, and more of the mortgaged population is holding a 6%+ rate. So the costs for existing mortgage holders are rising.

This likely means we'll see more existing owners elect to sell in 2026, as it becomes less profitable for the average homeowner to rent out their house. And more profitable to cash out on your equity, sell, and rent for a bit until market corrects.

Translation: expect more for sale inventory, and more downward price pressure in the for sale market.

1) The other obvious conclusion from the graph above is that finding a way to drive down the cost to buy a house would help unlock the housing market.

e.g., the closer the Mortgage Payment to Buy goes to Monthly Rent and Mortgage Cost for Current Owners, the more home sale transactions will take place.

As the financial incentive to move increases.

2) But that's proving harder to do to than anticipated.

The Fed has cut rates by 1.50% over the last year+, and there has been no meaningful decline in Mortgage Rates.

Meanwhile - national prices are still at near a record high, even if values are dropping in some markets.

The hatred of working class people by those who have taken over the left. A rambling thread. #takebacktheLEFT

I am strongly left leaning. I am the same kind of person who believed in the values that originally gave rise to parties such as Labour and Democrats.

I am not a revolutionary, I don't want social chaos. Many people like me became leftists because we wanted to see coal miners paid properly by rich factory owners and we wanted to see women be able to have choices other than being property of their husbands. The power and rise of the left came from these reasonable desires for fairness.

Unfortunately,
1/

3/ Unfortunately, the ideas behind leftism have some very serious limitations to them.

Don't get me wrong, think they were powerful ideas with important points to be made about exploitation. These analyses were important and valid, and I value them.
But what works in theory does not work in practice, at least not without limits.

One of the biggest problems on the left has been the fact that people who agree with leftist "analysis" of the problems have also bought into it's less useful solution and organizations.

We have seen that while many of the criticism of systemic greed that were valid were made by the left while certain remedies (revolution, forced collectivisation etc) were not.

Most people I know who vote to the left want regulation against capitalist excesses, they don't want to dismantle free enterprise. They also don't want to pay taxes for socialized medicine that goes fund the gender lobby (fake sex changes.)

The left of today is failing for a few reasons:

4/ The left of today is failing because instead of sticking to the goal of protecting the working class, it was hijacked to promote the interests of the academic and political class.

What happened to the left is part of what happens to most political movements that are founded on ideals:
those ideals get sold out, sometimes intentionally, sometimes through systemic failures.

Here's how it happened.

The left was built on ideas. Some of those ideas were good, and compelling.
Some of them were not so good.

But in order to promote the good and compelling ideas (protect the working class, pay people what they are worth, etc), we needed spokesmen. Those spokesmen were academics, polical people, and media workers. And THEY make their living by promoting ideas that don't solve problems. They make a living by promoting fake genders, academic programs, NGOs that get funding from the government they are supposed to be critical of.

As the left recruited affluent, Guardian class bourgeoisie people, we shouldn't be surprised to see the narratives of the left shift increasingly away from solving the problems of the working poor and into abstract narcissist agendas.

🧵 1/ AI may break the internet because it reduces the effort to produce good content, and therefore EFFORT no longer acts as a reliable signal of quality. There's an interesting economics back story if anyone is interested below.

wired.com/story/ai-slop-…

2/ First, the Internet is an information "Market for Lemons."

When used car lots were new in the 50s-60s, there was no way to tell whether you were buying a bad car (a lemon), or a good one (a peach). There was no Carfax or even standardized VINs.

sfu.ca/~wainwrig/Econ…

3/ Because buyers didn't know a good car from a bad, they would only pay the *average* price between them.

Since they paid the "same price," for a peach or al lemon, buyers underpaid for good cars and overpaid for bad.

Car dealers might not have started out bad, but..

It is axiomatic that if one refuses to recognize a problem, one cannot find its solution. JD Vance is gaslighting and pandering to the Jewish community.
Look at how he distinguishes antisemitism from racism and for what purpose.
1)

The Woke Right or Woke Reich as some call them is real and their ideas are being mainstreamed by J.D. Vance's close friend Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens and others.
2)

In fact, Kevin Roberts, the President of the Heritage Foundation has come under fire for his support for Tucker Carlson and Pat Buchanan and the scandal has damaged the reputation of both himself and the Heritage Foundation with employees and
3)

In 2010, Time Warner CEO said Netflix ($9B market cap) wasn’t a threat, calling it “the Albanian army”.

In 2025, Warner Bros sold to Netflix ($425B) for $83B.

How‘d NFLX do it? One reason was overpaying for 10x talent as explained in a 2009 Culture deck.

Here are 9 key slides:

1/ Netflix competes in media and tech (knowledge work that requires creativity). High-performers in these fields can be 10x better than the average.

In a "procedural" field (manufacturing), the best may only be 2x better (industries that deal with atoms are naturally capped).

2/ Most businesses get more complex as they grow. To deal with this, companies introduce processes (and bureaucracy) and curtail freedom.

In "procedural" industries (e.g., manufacturing), good processes will often make up for a lack of "high-performing" creative talent.

I was reviewing the Title VI hostile environment case of Yakoby v. University of Pennsylvania, currently on appeal to the Third Circuit. The district court dismissed the case with the remarkable and totally false assertion that “At worst, Plaintiffs accuse Penn of tolerating and permitting the expression of viewpoints which differ from their own.” 1/

Reviewing the plaintiffs complaint, here are some of the allegations made by the plaintiffs that have nothing to do with "tolerating the expression of viewpoints that differ from their own." 2/

Penn received antisemitic emails threatening violence naming Penn Hillel and Lauder College House specifically, and failed to warn students about the threats. 3/

WARNING: LONG THREAD 🧵
Dear Americans,
Your political and media class has sold you a very convenient fairy tale for decades - the tale of how your tax dollars pay to defend freeloading Europe.

While it's an emotionally satisfying narrative, it's also wrong.

THE U.S. DOES NOT SUBSIDIZE EUROPEAN DEFENCE.

You are not running a charity, you are running an empire. And empires are costly.

Your forward deployments, your bases, your carrier groups, etc. - they are the pillars of a global security architecture that mainly serves you: to protect your trade routes, your currency, your corporate supply chains, your ability to project force anywhere on the planet in hours and days, not months.

Let’s walk through this like adults, and not emotional toddlers, shall we?

1. Power projection, not philanthropy

Your prosperity rests on your ability to project power -military, financial, informational.

Your ports are not overflowing with cheap goods and energy because the world thinks you’re cute or because U.S. Treasuries are sacred. You sit at the center of the system because you guarantee that system with force: sea lanes, chokepoints, sanctions, no-fly zones when it suits you.

No one forced the U.S. into that role. Washington chose it because the benefits - geopolitical leverage, economic primacy, dollar hegemony - are enormous. Stop pretending it’s some unreciprocated act of kindness toward Europe.

2. Europe is your global hub

Open a map. Then look at where your stuff is.

Europe is the logistical backbone that lets you wage war and conduct operations across Africa, the Middle East, and parts of Asia without having to move everything across the ocean every time.

Ramstein and the rest of the European network are not there to “protect Germany’” They are there because from European soil you can:

- Fly troops and cargo to Iraq, Syria, the Gulf, the Sahel, Afghanistan and back with minimal time loss.

- Run command-and-control, ISR, and drone operations into multiple theatres.

- Treat wounded and rotate forces efficiently because the entire infrastructure is already in place.

You could try to rebuild that from scratch inside CONUS or in less stable regions. It would cost you billions, take years, and give you worse geography. Forward basing in allied countries is, in many analyses, cheaper than constantly rotating equivalent forces from the U.S. and trying to replicate those hubs at home.

So no, you’re not “paying to defend Europe.” You’re paying for real estate that underwrites your global reach.

My friend will make $500K+ this year with her solo business

If she doesn't do anything, she will owe more than $200K of taxes

Here's the list of strategies I gave her to implement before the end of the year to save 6-figures on taxes:

1 - Set up a Solo 401k

You can get a $70K tax deduction by setting up your own private 1-person 401k plan

Unlike a corporate 401k, you can invest in any asset you like & growth is tax-deferred

It also sets you up well for advanced strategies like the Mega Backdoor Roth IRA

2 - Look into a cash balance plan

For an even bigger tax deduction, you can pair your Solo 401k with a cash balance plan

This is a type of "defined benefit" plan that works backwards from giving you ~$3.3M at retirement

This could provide an tax deduction of $150K-$300K