External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @jamesmb view original on Twitter
The point is this:
The UK has access to technetium-99m because it's a member of an international treaty facilitating its trade & movement. Without it, treatment & detection of certain cancers is much harder, waiting lists will grow and people will die.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @jamesmb view original on Twitter
The further point is this:
There are 9.5 months to go until the UK drops out of EURATOM. 9.5 months is not enough to negotiate a brand new treaty or to join an existing one on another continent.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @jamesmb view original on Twitter
The further further point is this:
Molybdenum-99 has a half life of 2.75 days and decays to become technetium-99m (half life 6 hours). So the UK needs to get it from somewhere very close and with frictionless transfer.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @jamesmb view original on Twitter
So, let's now spend some time answering the specific points that were raised by #Brexiters about this very important issue, shall we?
This one: Yes, I have tears about the idea of people needlessly dying. It's not about whether you can afford it. It's about nuclear treaties.
This one: Not legally, you can't. Because of the treaty issue. See above.
This one: It's... oh. Wait. That's just an insult presumably based on not understanding the facts.
This one: Maybe "iamtommy" is some kind of local patois for "I don't understand nuclear materials or international treaties".
They get better - but this doesn't even come close to the stand out tweet insult of the day...
Generic insult.
One from a Villa fan...
I hate to conform to stereotype at this stage but look at the state of the punctuation on these three words...
Odd one. Seems to be suggesting that soldiers died for the right to make it harder to access materials that could save people's lives. Not entirely sure I follow the logic.
Nothing to do with price - everything to do with treaties governing the sale and transfer of nuclear materials.
Oh and it's about £150bn not a trillion - but they did not put it on the side of a bus, so there's no reason you'd know that.
Other countries are members of other treaties and buy it from other places that are closer to them.
Not even close enough to the best insult. Not in the same ballpark.
*TREATIES*
"Hi, it's the UK here. We'd like to join your treaty and trade with you. We are very trustworthy."
"Did you pay your contractually agreed obligations to the EU?"
"About that..."
"And you want us to trust you?"
"Well..."
"No."
I'm not 100% sure but I am fairly sure you cannot buy nuclear material from your local Mercedes dealership. Could someone pop down to one later and check? Thanks.
Oh @COutwin, I think we both know that these people have "had enough of experts"...
And then we get to this. Firstly, I have never found it funny that this could happen. It's precisely because it is not funny that I raise it...
Secondly, it shows something about the Brexit mentality that the response to someone worried about access to cancer treatments and scan materials post-Brexit is to wish they get cancer.
This is what we are up against. Denial and hatred.
1- have party 2- wait 3- get caught 4- appoint someone who was at party to investigate party, thereby causing delay 5- replace person with another person 6- person writes report and finds criminality 7- person sends list of crimes to police, thereby causing delay
1/2
8- police ask for redactions to report so they can investigate, thereby causing delay 9- bits of report published 10- cultists say we need to wait for police investigation, thereby causing delay 11- police investigation finds police knew all along
2/n
12- police announce no action until police investigation into police is concluded, thereby causing delay 13- police investigate police 14- police investigation gets complicated when senior ranks found to have been involved
3/n
There are rules for third-country nationals visiting France. These are not new rules. They are standard rules. You will need to comply with them if you are planning to come on holiday to France. I set them out here to help.
1/n
At the border, you may be asked for three pieces of information:
1. Motive for your stay in France
This can be satisfied by:
- for tourism: a hotel or other accommodation reservation
2/n
- in the absence of a hotel reservation, the traveller has to prove that he possesses means of living of at least 120€ per day – see point 2, documents from a travel agency;
- for a professional visit: letter from the employer, invitation from a French firm or org;
3/n
You might not want to listen to me. I used to be a Tory. Like, I used to work for them. I like to think that it was at a time when they were moderate but we can argue about that some other time.
Last time around, I was vehemently pro-No.
But they lied.
1/7
They lied when they told you that Scotland's place was as an equal partner in a UK at the heart of Europe. I can see that now. And looking back, I am sorry to say that I did not see it before. But it has been a lie for a long, long time.
Scotland is a trophy, not a partner.
2/7
Scotland has been the English magic money tree for a long old time. They took the oil revenue and 'spaffed it up the wall'. The idiots didn't even invest it for the future. They literally wasted it.
3/7
Today is significant for Britain but not for the reasons you're thinking
In the late 69s and early 70s, Britain lost the final bits of its empire. They were faced with two questions "Who are we and what is our place in the world?"
Concerned at the potential economic strength of the fledgling European community coming together on its doorstep, rather than coming to terms with the answers to those questions, it sensibly decided to join them.
Today is the moment of reckoning. Britain must come to terms with its new position in the world.
Small.
Alone.
Entirely under the control of whichever large trading bloc it ends up submitting to.
As Brexiters are keen to point out, the EU Budget will be massively hit once the huge financial contribution made by the UK has been removed.
To help you understand the extent of the problem, I have created an explainer.
THREAD
Here is the daily extra contribution that EU citizens will need to make as a result of the UK leaving.
5 cents.
However, EU budget contributions are proportionate to economic activity/size. So this presupposes that the EU does not find a way of replacing the trade it does with the UK...