In an article I’m writing now, I argue that archaeology can reveal the meat-eating feasts of Homeric heroes as food porn. And Homeric food porn didn’t age well
/1
These feasts feature a blood bowl. mmm mmm good
Animal slaughter just isn’t as appetizing these days. A popular theory is that ancient sacrificial rituals were conducted to atone for animal slaughter
I know, I know, you’d rather hear more about the archaeology of food porn!
/2
But, Homer is difficult to reconcile with archaeology. Should we compare his poems w/ the archaeology from when he was writing (750ish BC) or w/ the supposed time of the Trojan War (around 1200ish BC)
Descriptions of spears match those used in both the Bronze and Iron Ages
/3
These anachronisms (“things out of time” #wotd) are partly b/c Homer (if s/he was one person) wasn’t the only author. It was oral poetry that changed with each performance
Like the earliest recorded blues musicians, Homeric poetry owes to a long-lived folk tradition
/4
So, how can we relate fictional Homer to ancient reality?
Consider a pseudo-portrait of Homer sculpted hundreds of years after he died. It doesn’t show us how Homer actually looked. But it does help us understand how people later came to see this character
/5
This way of looking at a work of art or text is called reception studies. The emphasis is placed on the audience, and how they might have perceived Homeric epic
We can use the archaeology of the ancient Greek diet to understand how Homeric feasts were viewed
/6
The ratios of different isotopes from human skeletons give a sense of ancient diet. Specifically, the ratio of Nitrogen isotopes provides evidence of how carnivorous an individual was. A plant would be the lowest followed by an herbivore followed by a carnivore
/7
Carnivores who eat other carnivores are the highest (large fish eat small fish who eat smaller fish)
So, Nitrogen isotopes show how much meat (& dairy), fish, and veggies were consumed by ancient people. The conclusions can be refined with other tests too (e.g., Carbon)
/8
Why does this matter?
Well, different people ate very different quantities of meat, and Homeric poetry features a lot of animal sacrifice and meat
/9
For a long time, people thought that Homeric feasts reflected a meat-heavy diet in the Early Iron Age of Greece
After the fall of the Bronze Age palaces, people turned away from agriculture and towards animal herding. From farmers to cowboys
/10
My research at Nichoria has helped disprove this idea, specifically that of Dark Age Greek cowboys: uc.edu/news/articles/…
But, it’s not just animal bones, nitrogen isotope ratios show that people ate less meat in the Early Iron Age than those living in Bronze Age palaces
/11
So, in a sense you have songs salivating over “every kind of meat” performed for an audience of meat-starved Early Iron Age Greeks.
Emily Wilson’s translation of “rich roast meat” definitely gives a delicious food porn vibe
/12
But what about for later Greeks, say those who knew Plato in Classical Athens of the 5th century?
Nitrogen isotope ratios from a few cemeteries in Athens show that these Classical Athenians ate a lot more animal products than the Early Iron Age Greeks
/13
The animal bones from Classical Athens were butchered differently from those from sites I’ve seen in Early Iron Age Greece. They’ve mostly been chopped through with cleavers, rather than sliced with knives. I think of it as meat-processing on a larger-scale
/14
Some of this meat eating surely relates to the more common sacrificial feasts of the period, where they did the same rituals as in Homer. Burned thighbones are found aplenty near sacrificial altars
Homeric scenes were no longer food porn, but descriptions of regular feasts
/15
Instead, the Classical Athenians were focused on processed foods. As @ScullinSarah argues, these were seen as “civilizing” and healthy: eidolon.pub/hippocrates-wo…
Heavily butchered animal remains show this too. These pork cheeks and shoulders were probably cured
/16
The introduction of new cookpot types in Classical Athens also shows that new types of cooking were being introduced.
Comic poets, in their own version of food porn, highlighted this new cuisine and emphasized fish as an important delicacy
/17
These culinary shifts surely affected how Homeric feasting was seen.
Homer’s out-of-date food porn was even commented on by Euboulos: “Where does Homer ever speak of any of the Achaians eating fish?
/18
So, yeah. Ancient food porn is kinda cool to think about. Does the nudity in this painting make it a cross between real porn and food porn?
/19
For citations to images and quotations in this thread, see below:
There is no scholarly debate over who built the pyramids, nor is there a reason for scholars to debate YouTubers over who built them
The pyramids are splendid monuments. I know because I've seen them and climbed in them
But, there's no real mystery in their technology
/2
The innovation we think of as pyramids was a slow progression over generations
Nearly 5000 years ago in early Egypt, the 1st and 2nd dynasty erected funeral monuments at Abydos that were massive square enclosures made of mudbricks.
I’m an archaeologist who writes Twitter threads. They’re a window into the past looking at ancient people & a behind-the-scenes tour of 21st century #archaeology
We’re all familiar with the popular picture of ancient Greece, from the Mask of Agamemnon to the Parthenon in Athens
But, to me, the most exciting revolution sweeping archaeology is a shift to ordinary people. With new questions & methods, we can see them in higher resolution
/2
I reveal ancient people through their trash: the fragmented bones of the animals they’ve eaten
These bones show how people interacted with the natural environment and tell us about the sacrificial feasts that brought together whole communities
/3 eidolon.pub/in-defense-of-…
Pseudoarchaeology and fake history causes real harm in our society
Many people think, what’s the harm of hunting for a lost city? It’s entertainment, right! It even exposes children to real science
CW: The harm leads directly to racism and eugenics
1/18
The host of #HuntingAtlantis (@stelpavlou), and unfortunately his wife, have claimed that their TV show inspires children to be curious about real facts, real scientific methods, and real archaeology
This might be true in some cases, but there are problems with this argument
/2
The show misrepresents researchers. Repeatedly, archaeologists on #HuntingAtlantis present fascinating, new finds
Then, it cuts to the hosts who explain how these finds support their Atlantis theories
The experts have no recourse to reply to this fantastical jump in logic
/3
I have apparently pissed off some powerful people with my tweets about Atlantis
For a bit my account was locked. i have done nothing offensive. This TV show has misrepresented archaeologists and scholars. If some lawyer asks me, I can prove it
Bring it on, report my account
i'm not sure why someone's wife decided to write a 20 tweet thread about me, with the first tweet about my who my dad was
I am an archaeologist. I am a good archaeologist
Atlantis is just not real
if you really want to make a documentary about Atlantis, and cant even ask your experts about their opinions about Atlantis