Swiss Ramble Profile picture
Aug 20, 2019 20 tweets 19 min read Read on X
There is much talk about the so-called “Big Six” pulling away from the rest of the Premier League financially, but is this actually true? This thread looks at this question from the perspective of revenue, wages and total player costs #AFC #CFC #LFC #MCFC #MUFC #THFC
For the purpose of this analysis, we will take the 7th highest club in terms of revenue and wages for each season between 2010 and 2018. This means that the 7th placed club is not always the same. For example, for the last 4 seasons’ revenue this was #EFC, #LCFC, #WHUFC & #NUFC.
The highest revenue in the 2018 Premier League was #MUFC £590m, followed by #MCFC £503m, #LFC £455m, #CFC £448m, #AFC £389m, #THFC £379m and #EFC £189m. The highest growth since 2010 came at #MCFC with £378m (or 300%).
The gap between the club with the 6th highest revenue (#THFC £379m) and 7th highest (#EFC £189m) shot up to £190m in 2018, compared to £73m in 2017 (though this would have been higher without #LCFC £70m Champions League money). Back in 2010 the gap was only £29m.
One reason for the growing gap between 6th and 7th highest revenue clubs is investment in new stadia, which has increased match day revenue at #THFC from £37m to £76m, while this has actually fallen at the 7th placed club from £24m to £16m. Thus gap has grown from £12m to £59m.
The equitable Premier League TV deal means there has been relatively little change in the gap between 6th and 7th highest revenue clubs, though even here this has grown by £17m since 2010. From 2019/20 the new distribution model for overseas deals will further increase the gap.
In contrast, the gap between 6th and 7th highest revenue clubs for European TV money (Champions League and Europa League) has risen by £42m since 2010. In particular, #THFC European revenue rose from £5m to £54m in last 3 years. New UEFA deals are likely to accelerate this trend.
The good news for the 7th placed club is that commercial income has doubled from £14m to £30m since 2010, but the bad news is that this revenue stream has more than tripled at the 6th placed club from £32m to £103m, which means the gap has widened from £17m to £73m in this period
In summary, the 2018 gap between the 6th and 7th highest revenue clubs in the Premier League of £190m comes from all revenue streams, led by commercial £73m and match day £59m. The £58m difference in broadcasting is dominated by European competitions £42m with only £17m domestic.
It’s a similar story in terms of the £161m growth in the gap between the 6th and 7th highest revenue clubs in the Premier League since 2010 of £161m (from £29m to £190m): commercial £56m, match day £47m, broadcasting Europe £42m and broadcasting England £17m.
The highest wage bill in the Premier League 2018 was #MUFC £296m, followed by #LFC £264m, #MCFC £260m, #CFC £244m, #AFC £223m, #THFC £148m and #EFC £145m. The highest growth since 2010 came at #MUFC with £164m (or 125%).
However, in contrast to revenue, the gap between the 6th and 7th highest wages clubs in the Premier League has actually fallen in the last 4 years to just £2m (#THFC £148m vs. #EFC £145m), partly due to Short Term Cost Controls (FFP), which restricted wages growth.
The small wages gap is also down to #THFC’s noted parsimony, so it’s worth also looking at the gap between the 5th and 7th placed clubs. Here, the gap increased from £31m to £78m since 2010, though it has narrowed in the last 2 years from a peak of £102m in 2016.
Using player amortisation as a proxy for transfer spend, it is interesting to note that this is much higher at #MUFC £138m, #MCFC £134m and #CFC £124m, compared to #AFC £86m, #LFC £77m and especially #THFC £58m. In fact, Spurs are actually lower than #EFC £67m.
Actually, player amortisation has often been higher at other clubs than the lowest in the Big Six over last few years, as mid-tier clubs invested in their squad in an attempt to break through the glass ceiling (#EFC and #WHUFC) or buy players to sell profitably later (#SaintsFC).
That said, it’s a bit different if we again take 6th placed #THFC out of the equation, though the gap is lower than might be expected at only £10m (down from £25m two years ago). This is essentially unchanged from the £9m gap in 2010.
Combining wages and player amortisation to obtain total annual player costs, the highest in the Premier League in 2018 was #MUFC £434m followed by #MCFC £394m, #CFC £368m, #LFC £341m, #AFC £309m, #EFC £212m and #THFC £205m.
Significant player acquisitions have taken #EFC above #THFC in wages and player amortisation, continuing a trend that has been closing the gap since the £42m peak difference in 2014.
Again, this is largely due to much lower expenditure at #THFC than the rest of the Big Six. If we instead look at the gap to the 5th highest club (generally #AFC or #LFC), this has steadily risen since 2010 from £25m to £97m (though it was higher at £136m in 2016).
To sum up, the revenue gap between the Big Six and the rest of the league continues to grow apace. While the story appear to be not quite so clear-cut in wages and transfer spend (player amortisation), it is much the same if we exclude low spending #THFC from the comparison.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Swiss Ramble

Swiss Ramble Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SwissRamble

Dec 16
While Manchester City have hit some bad form on the pitch recently, their financial results for the 2023/24 season were pretty impressive, featuring a new Premier League revenue record of £715m and a substantial £74m profit #MCFC Image
City's revenue slightly increased to £715m, which means that this has risen by more than a third (£180m) in just five years from the 2019 pre-pandemic level of £535m. Growth has been led by commercial, which now accounts for 48% of total income #MCFC Image
Player trading has become increasingly important to City, having made £122m in 2022/23 and £139m in 2023/24. Up until 2019/20 the club had not generated more than £40m, so they have significantly improved this area of their operations #MCFC Image
Read 6 tweets
Nov 11
Review of Rangers' financial results for the 2023/24 season, when when they finished as runners-up in the SPFL Premiership for the third year in a row, were defeated in the Scottish Cup Final, but did win the League Cup. Also reached the Europa League last 16 #RangersFC Image
After two years of small losses, when they very nearly broke-even, Rangers lost £17m before tax, mainly because profit from player sales dropped from £24m to £6m #RangersFC Image
Image
Rangers' revenue rose £4.5m (5%) from £83.8m to a club record £88.3m, which means that this has grown by an impressive £35.1m (66%) in the last five years from £53.2m #RangersFC Image
Read 6 tweets
Sep 16
Review of Manchester United's financial results for the 2023/24 season. As always, #MUFC are the first Premier League club to publish their accounts.

The period included official confirmation of the deal whereby Sir Jim Ratcliffe acquired a 27.7% stake in United. Image
On the plus side, revenue rose £14m (2%) from £648m to a new club record of £662m, while profit from player sales increased from £20m to £37m, United's best result for 15 years #MUFC
Image
Image
However, the pre-tax loss quadrupled, widening by £98m from £33m to £131m, the second worst in United’s history. Club has posted a loss 5 years in a row, compared to healthy profits in five of the six years up to 2018/19 #MUFC Image
Read 6 tweets
Sep 2
A deep dive into this summer's transfer window, focusing on the Premier League, but also looking at the other major leagues. Image
Chelsea had the highest gross transfer spend in the Premier League for the third year in a row, i.e. ever since the Clearlake Capital crew arrived, with a hefty £265m.

Lowest gross spends were at Manchester City £25m and Liverpool £43m.
#CFC #MCFC #LFC Image
However, Chelsea once again had the highest player sales of £186m, followed by Aston Villa £172m and Manchester City £168m.
#CFC #AVFC #MCFC Image
Read 8 tweets
Aug 5
As Sunderland prepare for the new season, I took a look at the club's focus on sustainability. How close are they to achieving this and what are the implications for the performance on the pitch? #SAFC Image
The last available accounts from the 2022/23 season are now a full year out of date, but they still offer some indications of how well the strategy is working #SAFC
The bad news is that Sunderland have reported losses 17 years in a row, adding up to a hefty £272m. However, more positively, the club has drastically reduced the size of its losses, averaging less than £7m in the last four years, compared to £20m in the preceding decade #SAFC Image
Read 7 tweets
Jul 1
A review of Ipswich Town's finances, as they return to the Premier League after 22 long years away. Focus is on the latest available accounts from 2022/23, but also has comparisons with Championship clubs and some estimates for the top flight #ITFC Image
Losses have been growing under the new owners, as they invested in the squad and infrastructure in an attempt to return Ipswich to former glories - which has clearly worked #ITFC Image
Even though they were in League One, 2022/23 was the first time that the club broke through the £20m revenue barrier since the last time that they were in the Premier League back in 2001/02 #ITFC Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(