Cross-examination of @iam_anandv, the second witness for the petitioners, will continue now
The witness reiterates that there is almost no publicly available technical information about #NIIMS or #HudumaNamba, but by looking at the technological purpose that govt has repeatedly stated, the architecture can be understood
The court room is packed for the #HudumaNamba hearings - standing room only!
Should we credit govt for benchmarking international best practices? asks counsel for GoK
"Yes, but they still got it wrong" says expert witness @iam_anandv
Technology design, software used should be shared says witness @iam_anandv - existing industry standard is to put most algorithms out in open source so everyone can look at it deeply, find faults, and fix it
(Not personal info, but the algorithms & standards) #HudumaNamba
Data minimization & purpose limitation are important principles, but witness says he does not agree #NIIMS follows these principles
Interlinking of data in #HudumaNamba fundamentally changes what govt has been doing with data
Data is always *used* in these systems - breaches don't happen during storage but use, and at that time data is unencrypted
There is a lot of technical information in GoK affidavits on #NIIMS and it is nearly exactly the same as #Aadhaar says expert witness
Counsel for GoK asks second witness if he sees any benefit in the #HudumaNamba initiative
"There is a benefit in doing ICT projects, but based on architecture of the #NIIMS project, the costs will greatly outweigh any benefits"
Is "single source" a benefit? asks GoK counsel
"Single source is used for *identification* - by linking other databases that are *functional* the risks outweigh any benefits from the single source" replies witness
"It is a stretch to believe that a single identification system could isolate a terrorist" states the second witness for the petitioners in #HudumaNamba case
A biometric system is NOT fool proof - even when combined with other biometrics & demographic information, it will give false positives and false negatives - such as failing to recognize a person as already registered and gives them another number says @iam_anandv
Data from India shows aging and time do affect fingerprints - meaning "biometrics" age too (thus creating problems with matching) states expert witness in response to questions from GoK counsel
Witness @iam_anandv is not satisfied with how GoK has sought to deal with these biometric challenges, as explained in the respondents' affidavits and witness statements on #HudumaNamba & #NIIMS
No system is perfect - but what is the *implication* of failure in biometrics?
What if it means a failure to match fingerprints means a person doesn't get his/her food rations? asks @iam_anandv, expert witness in #HudumaNamba case
"The law cannot fix what technology has broken" -@iam_anandv
You should never stop using technology - but you should use the *right kind* of architecture in order to minimize the threats says expert witness @iam_anandv
Objectives of technology projects may lead to design of a system that is not aligned with rights - so if a system will impact citizens, it's easier to work with law that can guide the design
The reverse - tech before law - is not true says @iam_anandv
Witness @iam_anandv is explaining what he means by “centralized and federated”
The #NIIMS aims to create a link between the central #NIIMS database and various functional databases (which are silos now) - like a hub and spokes, working as a single wheel
If I enroll in #NIIMS then they de-duplicate it would say you match x person’s fingerprints 75% and y person’s fingerprints 40%, etc - same for iris & bio data
How do you make a decision? Apply a threshold: X% is considered a “match”
1. Purpose-free architecture: you can use the data for any purpose, it’s not limited, and once the system architecture is built that way you can’t go back
2. System design: enrollment does not follow data minimization (form asks for info not needed to give a identity number - #Aadhaar in comparison only asked for a few data points)
If purpose is to issue a #HudumaNamba, most of info asked on form is not necessary
2. System design (continued): design is not modern and there could be better alternatives for the purpose;
4. Mass surveillance: when you connect functional databases together, a hack to one means access to all data without a warrant or due process & it allows profiling
Govt already has decryption key and so encryption is not a protection against surveillance
Authentication data itself creates logs (where you are, what you do, what you access, etc when you use the number for any transactions) and can be used for profiling itself
#Digitalidentity projects are becoming more common around the world - which means there is a growing community of experts that can examine and improve system design says @iam_anandv
Other public info beyond system design on #HudumaNamba#NIIMS should have included how exactly government is dealing with exclusion, decisions on trade offs, & process to safely report any bug or issue to GoK
There are technology choices you can make to achieve the same goal with less exclusion, with more ability for people to choose how to identify themselves
Build systems that work with the law says witness @iam_anandv
Anand: When you don’t see structured thought, data, cost/benefit analysis for the economy & country going into decisions around ID systems - you are relying on hope and prayer
Based on respondents documents, witness @iam_anandv says GoK will use some open source software in their system architecture but prefer the system to be closed source
In January, the High Court stopped the implementation of #NIIMS
The government can only move on #HudumaNamba *after* a comprehensive regulatory framework is in place to address exclusion & data privacy
The court was clear: even processing and using the data collected needed the regulatory framework first
It's not yet in place
(Yet PS Kibicho said millions of #HudumaNamba records have been cleaned & matched - a clear violation)
The #HudumaNamba judgement highlights risks to #privacy, data protection, and inclusion & struck out use of DNA & GPS - a significant win for the rights of all Kenyans
But other aspects of the judgement must be challenged to ensure stronger #humanrights protections
Currently on going: community forum in Kisii
The quest for awareness creation on citizenship and governance continues while respecting government stipulated #COVID19 guidelines #Governance#governanceke
Challenges faced by community members in Kisii 1- To get ID cards the community has to reach a quorum of 10 applicants. A challenging number to hit due to their small population. It can take up to a year or two to reach the quorum.
2- Marriage certificate issuance is also an issue since the community does not have a Kadhi's court in kisii. They are forced to travel to homabay to get these services
An individual must present an I.D whenever requesting social services or making transactions.
Lack of ID limits the ability of youth to make a living within and outside the country
Our documentary highlights challenges the nubian community faces following the inconsiderate process of attaining fundamental national documents #Statelessness#ukweli#IdentityandCitizenship
Then Nubian rights forum would like to wish all kenyans a Happy Madaraka Day.
While we celebrate madaraka, we cannot pretend that it is a happy day. Not when the state of the nation is no different from the colonial days. #NotYetUhuru#notyetmadaraka #aThread#MadarakaDay
There is no madaraka when kenyans are stripped of their dignity and denied to bury their loved ones while those priviledged in the country get decent send offs because somehow, government directives only apply to common mwananchi
What makes us different? #EndPoliceBrutalityKE