Kapil Sibal making arguments.
They cannot do that under S. 144, not even under Article 19(2), Sibal.
Even if you wish to produce such material, you cannot, Sibal.
In an issue like this, why cant there be, asks Justice R Subhash Reddy.
Curfews are imposed in such cases, Justice Gavai.
But how can you assume that the entire population will create problems, Sibal.
The problem is their creation, Sibal.
So you admit there is a problem, Justice R Subhash Reddy.
It is a creation if their act, Sibal.
That would need to be passed by Parliament but that is a different issue, Sibal.
Now that is an assumption that riots will take place. It is in the mind. There are intelligence inputs based on which restrictions can be placed. We should not allow arms of the law to become irrelevant like this, Sibal
"In every case of curfew, in such circumstances, some people may suffer", Justice R Subhash Reddy.
It is the duty of State to maintain public order. It is also the duty of the State to use 19(2) to protect freedoms under Article 19. That is my argument, Kapil Sibal.