The matter is that since 2014 Russia has been under US/EU sanctions due to its annexation of Crimea and parts of Donbas, both are #Ukraine’s territories.
Mainstream economists in the West have tended to see sanctions as a tool that would crush, punish, and restrain Russia.
3/
That mainstream view has been wrong. Rather, sanctions were helpful for Kremlin as it self-imposed them.
Sanctions did help Kremlin to make transition from unhealthy economy as of end 2013 towards a much more flexible one now.
That @FT article dated Nov-19 featuring the now newly appointed PM Mishustin and celebrating Russia’s tech upscale tax system is in line w my view, IMO.
5/
While the @FT article on Mishustin back in Nov-19 presents Russia’s upscale tax system as one that fights corruption and inefficiency, true meaning of it is that Russia has been seriously strengthening its finance system.
6/
This is second grand step in this direction.
The first one was made back in 2013-14 when Russian authorities moved towards true floating FX regime for own money unit, ruble or #RUB. This 1st step also included re-arrangements the dom finance sector (some call it “cleaning”).
7/
This quotes from the @FT’s article interviewing #Mishustin are worth to be mentioned here👇
8/
@FT Russia's economic restructuring from 2013 till now and ongoing has been about 3 major points:
(1) gaining greater monetary sovereignty by making $RUB a truely floating currency and directing local businesses to gradually reduce FX debt,
9/
(3) while in the fiscal & monetary policies there has been a heavy loaded orthodox approach like Germany's black-zero policy (of fiscal surpluses).
As a result, growth has been very weak over the past several years now...
11/
@FT ...and it even caused Minister of Economy Maxim #Oreshkin to rebel against the orthodoxy of the central bank and ministry of finance (read Oreshkin's interview here: bit.ly/2q0RbwJ)
@FT All in all, IMO, #Mishustin's appointment is a continuation of a long tradition of relying on what does work. It is also a (quite slow) shift in Kremlin to relying a bit less on the econ orthodoxy and embracing a bit more of heterodox econ views. (It must b Oreshkin's win.)
/END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This piece of early 2016 in Ukrainian was handed to many quite top ppl in the 🇺🇦 private financial markets industry and even to the ppl who have in charge of economic reforms in 🇺🇦 such as today’s econ advisor of office @ZelenskyyUa
Now and back then, the logic of sanctions is they do work. What I have been trying to argue is theory behind sanctions is standard one. In that theory high finance is unquestioned and access to it treasured. An economy cannot exist without it. What if it’s weak theory?
In 1886, great Russian novelist Leo Tolstoy published a non-fiction piece called 'What Then Must We Do?'.
There is a chapter on #money, which in effect sounds very much familiar and close to the #MMT motto -- #taxes-drive-money.
1/4
Tolstoy: "Any money is getting accepted between people only when they are forcefully demanded to be delivered by everybody. When every person needs money to redeem herself/himself from violence, only then money will obtain stable exchange value..."
Tolstoy (cont'd): "... And what is demanded by the government [to be delivered by people as payment of taxes, fees, etc] obtains value, not what is convenient for exchange."
@INETeconomics By a chance, the article saying #MMT "theorists ignore how their policies could hurt developing countries" places #Ukraine currency #hryvnia (notes of 20 hryvnia's) as its cover picture.
1/n
@INETeconomics Btw, another time when #MMT-related literature opted by a mere chance to associate itself with #Ukraine's currency was the book 'Can "It" Happen Again?' written by Hyman Minsky (2nd ed published in 2016).
This time there is a jar of coins 5 kopecks each (5 #копійок).
2/n
@INETeconomics I am #Ukrainian, having a 22-year experience in the Ukraine's financial sector (1995-2017) and working full-day jobs first as bank officer doing debts/credits and then as research economist. I worked in the banking sector as well as in the non-banking financial sector.
3/n