My Authors
Read all threads
This "floodgates" argument makes very little sense. If a majority of senators wants to subpoena only John Bolton, they can. If they want to subpoena more witnesses they can do that too. But it's up to them.

The idea, I guess, is that the Senate would "have to" give in to Trump's demands on some witnesses if they call Bolton. But they wouldn't have to. Again, it's up to them.
The "if we call Bolton, it would open to floodgates to witnesses" argument is similar to the "if we call Bolton, Trump will sue and drag things out in court forever" argument.

Both are tempting excuses for GOP senators who want to end things, but neither make much sense.
More of the same here. This is basically the White House threatening to shoot itself in the foot. Not a credible threat.

politico.com/news/2020/01/2…
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Andrew Prokop

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!