With terrific leadership & masterful understanding of the military's oath to the Constitution, ADM Mullen's article made the intellectual case.

From his time on the "inside" & understanding of the implications, former SecDef/GEN Mattis brought some emotional fire. 1/17
But here's some food for thought:

While those in uniform will never attack their fellow Americans,

They also don't hold the key to "saving" them, either.

Hear me out... 2/17
There have been many that have commented on President Trump's chipping away at Constitution norms over the last 3+ years.

We've sen a crescendo and a constant deterioration, and in the last three days it has reached an inflection point 3/17
Those I've served with & admired have addressed some of the issues from their expert experiences. For those not paying attention, here are examples:
-GEN Barry McCaffrey has publicly pointed out executive malfeasance
-GEN Stan McChrystal uses lack of values in his argument 4/17
-GEN Marty Dempsey has tweeted about how leaders build teams & address complex issues & then implies how those examples are contrary to what we see daily
-ADM Bill McRaven points out systemic flaws, crude approaches, bad behavior, and the breaking of our institutional norms 5/17
-Marine GEN John Allen had made the case, multiple times, of threats to our alliances & our security
-In their own way, members of the Joint Chiefs -Army, Air Force, Navy, Marines and National Guard- continued to show to their services what right really looks like. 6/17
-Yesterday, both Secretary Esper and GEN Milley made a point of openly stating what they believe, and what they stand for.

Some may claim that was excuse making, or walking back of mistakes, but both made the point clearly and publicly, orally and in writing. 7/17
All these men have a lifetime of service. More than any other institution, they are educated and trained on our uniquely American way of the profession of arms.

And they have all taken an oath to defend the Constitution. Ideas. Unlike any other military. 8/17
None WANT to point out dangers resulting from ineffective leadership, bad policy, nonexistent strategy, or other factors that may harm those in charge. When speaking, it's usually with a cautious tone.

And there's a rule: don't knock those in the chain of command 9/17
But when that fails, over and over, there is a need to speak louder and more forcefully.

The timing is different for some than it is for others. But there is always a moral tipping point. Each of these individuals reached that for themselves somewhere along the way. 10/17
All of them addressed the strength and weaknesses of our republic with their comments.

They have all said the military won't commit violations of their constitutional oath, they will not break laws, they will not commit immoral acts.

That's how the military is trained. 11/17
But there are things the military won't do. They won't "save us."

They won't come to the rescue to overthrow elected officials. They won't interfere in writing laws, or executing rule of law. They won't "fix" what some say is "broken." 12/17

That's not the military's job
I have often been outspoken, on this site and on @CNN.

I have been accused of being an "Obama general" (FTR, I've served under 5 GOP & 3 DEM Presidents during my career...all my general officer promotion nominations were from GWB, and I never voted for any POTUS. 13/17
Yet, I've been accused of being partisan, received demands that "you generals need to take over," told things that our military was doing was immoral (it usually involved them following legal orders), while -of course- being called a "boomer."

But here's the thing...14/17
Citizens were voicing concerns because they didn't like what was happening in our government.

They must have forgotten the job of "fixing" those things is not the job of anyone in the military. It's the job of the people, their elected officials, their laws and policies. 15/17
Back to where I started.

ADM Mullen & SecDef Mattis (& others) provided insight.

It's now time for American citizens to take that insight & do something. Vote, help others vote, write your elected officials, serve your nation in some way.

Because no one will "fix it" 16/17
Thanks for attending my TedTalk. 17/17

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Hertling

Mark Hertling Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MarkHertling

Feb 2
A thread:

Earlier, I commented about a reporter in @PentagonPresSec briefing asking whether @82ndABNDiv would parachute into Poland.

Since then, lots (LOTs) of paratroopers commented on in-flight rigging, how it would send a message, how it's been done on exercises etc. 1/7
From a theater commander's perspective, here are the pros and cons:

Pros:
1. Yes, you can do in-flight rigging (but it's difficult and takes excessive space).
2. Yes, it would send a message (but not a good one, given we are not trying to be excessively provocative).
2/7
3. Yes, the 82d has parachuted into Poland (and Germany, and several other countries in Europe) before (but almost all were in the summer, as part of an exercise, and with other nations).
4. Yes, I'm a tanker & therefore a "leg" (but I know a bit about airborne ops in EU). 3/7
Read 7 tweets
Jan 17
A thread on theories, leadership & learning....

I had the pleasure of engaging a group of Professional MBA students this weekend in a"Strategic Leadership" class

As an adjunct, these classes are fun, especially since we discuss application of knowledge in the real world 1/12
Last semester, these students received an introduction to "leadership theories."

For info, there are literally *dozens* of theories on leadership, but we wanted groups of students to do a deeper dive on 4 different theories, their meaning & potential application. 2/
The theories the 4 groups analyzed were:
1. Leader-Member Exchange (or LMX) theory
2. Servant Leadership Theory (which most wanted to analyze, because they felt they were "servant leaders")
3. Transactional Leadership Theory, and
4. Transformational Leadership Theory 3/
Read 12 tweets
Dec 7, 2021
Some facts to put this article in perspective:
1.Pentagon always does “planning” for civilian evacuations in a war-torn country. Plus, there are contingency plans already on the shelf that are adapted. 1/
2. There are always “courses of action” & a “number of different scenarios” based on the situation & thoughts on how to conduct the NEO (non-combatant evacuation operations) Having planned and conducted these, the course of action usually changes, sometimes more than once. 2/
3. While the Pentagon plans, the State Dept is always the lead for these actions. They make the call on when to execute and how many citizens to remove. State never has an accurate count of US citizens in any particular country. 3/
Read 15 tweets
Nov 10, 2021
A tip, America: you’ll soon become familiar with the terms “Suwalki Gap” & “Kaliningrad enclave.” These are two areas every NATO veteran understands as critical flash points.
Russia/Putin are pushing refugees into this area from Belarus, and any misstep by Polish borders forces create the opportunity for Russia to “defend Russians” in K-grad while marching forces into the Baltic countries of Latvia/Lithuania/Estonia (all NATO members).
This has been a strategic goal of Putin, Poland & the Baltics will likely respond, and it will create a requirements for a NATO Article V action.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 27, 2021
A suicide attack - SVIED or VBIED - is a commander’s biggest threat in these environments. They’re hard to stop, even at checkpoints…because they are already there and can be initiated when found. 1/
The only way to address them is 1) find the cell that is making them 2) constantly change methods at checkpoints 3) have greater standoff 4) limit crowds. All of these were difficult at HKIA. 2/
We had a network of female suicide vest wearers in Iraq that were particularly confounding. Widows of terrorists, group leaders drugged them, convinced them they had nothing to live for, and sent them on their mission. 3/
Read 10 tweets
Aug 26, 2021
"The Generals lied to the American public!"

This - along with the politicians lied, the intel community lied, etc - has been a mantra repeated the last few days on cable news and in print media. 1/
There were certainly LOTS of mistakes over the 20 years of the Afghan war, as outlined in several official governmental reports and well-researched news articles.

There were likely some - many? - mistakes, and maybe even some coverups, corruption, or misleading testimony. 2/
But I'll go on a limb & say the vast majority of leaders - senior, junior, officer & NCOs; governmental officials & reps of State & USAID; reps from the intel community - who served in AFG did the very best they could to serve that nation and its people & represented the US. 3/
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(