I use "myth" here deliberately, in the sense of a widespread narrative that may be grounded in truths, past or present, but becomes a part of the broader culture
2/
The myth is this: POLICE PROTECT US. They are the #ThinBlueLine that divides civilized society and the criminals -- shadowy, amoral, even feral, probably ethnic - that threaten our property and families
3/
The myth is perpetuated by pop culture - police procedurals, films, the maverick cop who doesn't play by the rules - it's all justified because they are going to shoot the bad guys who threaten us 4/
But #BLM and now #GeorgeFloyd have helped undermine the myth, showing how little truth it holds for communities of color and especially Blacks in this country; whoever the "us" is that are protected, it ain't them
5/
Miraculously, the protests have opened up (at least some) white eyes also. Multiple accounts on social media and elsewhere have hammered home how the "us" of police myth doesn't even apply to most white folks, from victims of rape/sexual assault to petty theft
6/
In reality, we have allowed an (increasingly militarized) security force to set up shop in the middle of our communities, with the myth used to justify all kinds of authoritarian rules and thuggish behavior
7/
Privilege allows many to ignore the costs, both financial and human, of having what is essentially an occupying army in our communities. "Just be respectful and obey the law" and nothing bad will happen!
8/
Of course, tell that to #BreonnaTaylor or and so many others. One of #BLM 's goals, only partially realized, is forcing privileged Americans to confront the falsity of the police myth through #saytheirnames
9/
But that task has been made easier in recent weeks, as Americans watch geared-up "soldiers" wage war against their own citizens - chemical warfare, beatings, torture - without any consequences for the perpetrators 10/
Local political officials, especially mayors, are of little help, because they are either so steeped in the myth that they believe it; or afraid of violating it, because their (white, wealthy) donors/voters still believe, partially or wholeheartedly, in the myth
11/
These true believers still see videos like what happened in #RVA, they think "why didn't they get out of the way?" Police still deserve deference, special treatment - their need to get somewhere is more important, because THEY KEEP US SAFE etc. 12/
Plus police departments themselves are the most insular of bureaucracies, protected by "law-and-order" politicians who want to appear strong to their (again, white and wealthy) constituents
13/
(if reforming a bureaucracy is like turning an oil tanker, reforming a police department is like turning an oil tanker that is controlled by a heavily armed military force that does NOT want to turn)
14/
That's why #DefundThePolice is so important - "reform" is slow, and easily frustrated by supporters of the myth. A few well-placed funding cuts can cripple a department's ability to enforce policies that actively harm citizens
15/
Why pay for surveillance tools like police planes and helicopters? Why fund military "tanks" and weapons? Why contract with police officers in healthcare and educational settings? The immediate goal should be to minimize the damage police can do
16/
It won't be easy, even here in #RVA, where it's clear the Mayor has zero control over #RPD. #DefundThePolice is gaining traction because more and more people have recognized that upholding the myth of law enforcement is absolutely not worth the tremendous cost
17/End
As I prep my political theory class for this fall, I'm struck that one thing the TX abortion law should hammer home, and that some of us sometimes forget: conservatism is openly hostile towards individual freedom #Thread
1/
As ideology, conservatism embraces ancient ideas of difference. Plato's Republic imagines world where people are sorted according to innate characteristics; Aristotle thought democracy was worst form of government. To Greeks, some people just better suited to rule than others
2/
In 1790, Brit Edmund Burke essentially launched conservatism by criticizing the French revolution. Liberty is fine, Burke argued, but what if it's the liberty of a "madman" or "murderer"? Freedom needs constraints, and isn't for everyone
3/
As #VAGOP convention approaches, candidates talking about banning "critical race theory" from our schools. We know that racist appeals work on many white voters (hi Donald!) but this one is especially insidious. Here's why #Thread
1/
First, #CriticalRaceTheory is term for some pretty high-level scholarship and theoretical work, like real pomo philosophy shit. Crenshaw, Delgado, Bell. Mostly influential in legal theory. Time mag explainer (h/t to @bluevirginia) is just fine: 2/ time.com/5891138/critic…
Key here: CRT is WAY less influential than critics claim, even in theory circles. Often mocked by traditional establishment voices. Just check this '98 Cornell law review article that claims to take CRT seriously, but actually drips w mockery/disdain 3/ scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewconten…
Background: the federal govt's Home Owners' Loan Corporation was a New Deal org aimed at helping people keep their homes post-Depression. Financially, it did pretty well - even turning a small profit 2/ trumanlibrary.gov/library/public…
But to "help" mortgage lenders, they generated maps of urban areas, color-coded by how "secure" neighborhoods would be for home loans. Here's the RVA map - guess what they based "security" on? 3/
Happy weekend VA! Earlier this week I tweeted out #VoteNoOn1, the redistricting commission amendment. I'm still a No, but feel a Prof's need to clarify after hearing from some folks on both sides #Thread 1/
Earlier I said we all want Non-partisan, but even A1 supporters say that's basically impossible. What we actually want is INDEPENDENCE. Current SB 5015 tries to specify criteria for citizen members beyond "party picks" so it would help if passed 2/
But doesn't get over the fact that legislators are on the commission, and that one or two of them could use their veto power for mischief. In an uneven partisan environment (where GOP routinely kicks Dems' ass on process/power) I don't see a way around that 3/
Good morning VA! As early voting ramps up around the state, now’s a good time to remind you to Vote NO on Amendment 1, which supposedly ensures fair redistricting. I’m not convinced. Here's why: #VoteNOon1 #Thread 1/
Background: you probably know that “redistricting” - drawing district lines for state legislature and Congress - is super important is for setting the political course of the next decade. So do politicians, which is why they try to control it 2/
A coalition pushed for fair, non-partisan process by 2019 deadline. (Constitutional amendment in VA needs GA to pass a resolution twice, then approved on voter ballot Q.) They didn't get it! Instead, they put in place a compromise
3/
Anyone check out the #RVAProtests "112 Days" show on @CBS6 last night? You can watch it on MSN (linked below), but I did so you don't have to. Two big thoughts: #Thread 1/
First, the doc not great on repping protestors. Some efforts to give voice to protest, but probably not central figures. I get it - it's hard to parse, there's no "President of the Movement," and lots of folks probably didn't want to talk
2/
But still - why so much freakin' Mark Holmberg? Why let him complain that protestors marched at Lee Circle but not Gilpin Court- and then ignore multiple anti-eviction actions? 3/ richmond.com/news/local/wat…