Thread by @Vyasonmukh

What an agenda driven portal @Wikipedia is !

In this thread, you will see an example how they are trying to paddle fake agenda by citing "laughable/substandard references" in the field of #History

• Wiki Page - Battle of Haldighati
• Fake Agenda/Claim - Mughal Victory

1/6

2/6

To substantiate the claim "Mughal Victory", two references are cited

• 1st ref. - The Mughal Empire at War (pic 1)
• Writer - Andrew De La Garza (pic 2)

This book released in 2016 only and has only 4 lines for this battle p56 (pic 3)

Issues with this citation are ...

3/6

Issues in 1st citation -

• Cited reference is absolutely insufficient as it doesn't contain any primary material to support claim of Mughal victory

• Writer has no credential on his name to get cited on subject like "Battle of Haldighati".

Now coming to 2nd reference

4/6

• 2nd reference - Dictionary of Battles & Sieges
• Writer - Tony Jaques

Isaues are -

• Writer is NOT from the field of #History
• He thinks Haldighati is in Punjab 😇
• Again, no primary material given to support the claim

Aren't these both laughable citations ?

5/6

Biased @Wikipedia has not cited a single Indian or Mughal ref. to support "Mughal victory" at Haldighati.

In reality,

No Mughal reference is claiming victory in Haldighati war.

While Indian references are saying Maharana Pratap was never defeated in Haldighati.

6/6
Epigraphical ref. at Jagdish Temple and copper plates of Mohi & Pipali villages narrates Maharana was ruling in Mewad even after battle of Haldighati

This thread clarifies why Maharana Pratap never lost the battle of Haldighati 👇

https://twitter.com/KshatriyaItihas/status/1275421755167760386?s=19