Do not let the media or right wing opposition write our narratives. Let the evidence write them Instead.

Remember how Hillary Clinton lost the state of Wisconsin because she did not visit there?

Practically handed it to him she did!

That damn Hillary Clinton!

1/
That's the story they tell us, so it must be true. RIGHT?

Of course, that view strengthens the "Hillary did everything wrong" narrative that has dominated the coverage since 2016.

'Blame Hillary' has become a national Olympic sport at this point.

2/
But the truth is much more sinister and much more complicated than the silly and misogynistic lie that all of this is Hillaryb Clinton's fault.

In fact, the real story of how Clinton came to almost not lose Wisconsin actually turn the accepted narratives on their ear.

3/
Clinton lost the state of Wisconsin by a mere 22,748 votes.

That's it.

But this vote deficit had nothing to do with Clinton's policy proposals, her supposed unpopularity, nor the decision not to visit Wisconsin.

That's right.

It's was not Hillary's fault.

4/
From his first day in office Wisconsin Gov..Scott Walker began in earnest to attack voting rights in probably the most aggressively partisan and racist way possible.

*Voter suppression
*Voter purges
*Voter ID laws
*Limiting access to polling stations.

5/
These were tools that Walker learned to use expertly during his time in office. And they were put to full effect for 2016.

Hillary Clinton voting base was attacked aggressively, while Trump's was left largely unaffected.

The net effect was a nightmare..

6/
The net affect? Voter turnout was flat or up across the demographic spectrum except in the Milwaukee area where the black vote was down 25% compared to 2008.

This was not because black people did not want to vote or even that they did not try to vote. Not even close.

7/
Its that the state of Wisconsin successfully endeavored to keep them from voting.

It was intentional and planned..

They kept anywhere from 40,000 to 180,000 black people out of the voting booth.

All that cheating. All that effort.

And Clinton only lost by 22,748 votes .

8/
So no, it was not Clinton's fault.

I repeat, it was NOT Clinton's fault.

It never was.

Instead, The blame lies with former governor, Scott Walker, (whose name you should definitely not say backwards three times while looking into a mirror).

9/
His successful efforts to keep the key voting blocs who most strongly supported Clinton from voting handed the cheese state to Trump.

It was disgraceful and had the voting rights not been gutted by the Supreme Court in 2013 would have been illegal. Ll)p
motherjones.com/politics/2017/…
Let's not do that again. Please God, not again.

Lessons:

REGISTER TO Vote.

Decide how you will vote.

Decide where you will vote.

Get all necessary IDs.

Volunteer

VOTE.

#IllegitimatePresident
#Rigged
#SheWon
#VoterSuppression
#BidenHarris2020

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Robert #Resist Sandy

Robert #Resist Sandy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @frodofied

1 Jul
America got almost everything wrong in 2016.

It was a terrible year.

We were collectively ridiculous. We made terrible decisions. We did terrible things.

Like some drunk teenage white dude we bullied the smart girl and crowned the entitled dumb jock.

Damn.

1/
Turns out that our own latent misogyny was even stronger than our aversive racism.

And that is a sad mouthful right there.

We hate smart, powerful women so much that we were willing to pass over one of the best them for one of the worst examples of men conceivable.

2/
When one looks back at the ease with which so many were willing to embrace the worst unsubstantiated rumor about @HillaryClinton whilst simultaneously ferociously defending @realdonaldtrump's many cataclysmic abhorrencies, it is easy to be rendered speechless.

3/
Read 12 tweets
4 Jun
Most people still do not understand my inability, actually my refusal, to let go of 2016 and what happened to @HillaryClinton in her attempt to become the first woman to win US Presidency.

The assumption is that I am singularly fixated on Clinton, but that is wrong

1/
Granted, I think that she was, in fact, and probably still is, the person most qualified and able to lead us at that time and this.

Her intellect and depth of knowledge, her steadiness, her curiosity, her stamina, her experience, and her contact list make her uniquely able.

2/
She is literally all of those things. And the current, ahem occupant, is none of those things. He lacks ability and nobility, he lacks empathy and humility, he lacks knowledge and curiosity. He lacks everything necessary to lead any size nation, let alone ours.

3/
Read 15 tweets
30 May
In 1992 @BillClinton scored well with audiences across the country with a line that went something like, "There is nothing wrong with this country that what's right with this country can't fix."

And that might have been true, then.

Today? I am not so sure.

We are broken.

1/
If we think of the nation as a body, then we are broken in places that should never get broken. Parts of us are plain shattered.

When our bodies break we seek help from doctors and nurses and other trained professionals to help us heal.

But there are no doctors for this.

2/
I have spent my life against the ropes, but I have always understood that it could get and be worse, and I have always understood the subtle, unspoken benefits of being a white man in a world controlled by others like me.

These truths have guided my path through the world.

3/
Read 18 tweets
28 Apr
So, emergency rooms across the country are ACTUALLY seeing cases of bleach and disinfectant ingestion and injection as a result of the "President's" unbelievable and ridiculously uninformed & dangerous comments.

I was dumb enough to believe that nobody would be dumb enough.

1/
Believe me when I tell you that if Hillary Clinton had said anything nearly as stupid (which she never would, because, obviously) I would call her out for being the moronic charlatan that she was.

Note: I would certainly never choose to ingest bleach to prove my fealty.

2/
Most of this goes without saying, which is to say it is obvious to anyone who's been paying attention and employing reason or logic on an even basic level.

Words like sheep and monkey come to mind, but I would hate to insult our fellow mammalliams in the comparison.

3/
Read 5 tweets
11 Mar
I've been mostly absent during the Dems nominating process because, frankly, I knew that those whom I could possibly vote for to nominate in place of @HillaryClinton totaled zero.

ZERO.

I still believe that Clinton should have remained the Democrats de facto nominee in 2020.
1/
I will always believe that it sends a terrible and destructive message to allow foreign agents, a rival candidate, and a rival party conspire against any rival candidate or party to steal an election.

Period.

I think that message became doubly so in 2016.

2/
That nobody in the slate of 2020 nominees was able to forgo their own egos for sale of nation and party became unbearably depressing.

By refusing to fight for Clinton, the Democratic party and every nominee that ran, have made the political future of this nation much darker.
3/
Read 7 tweets
24 Feb
Bernie Sanders as President would be a disaster for the Democratic Party, and as great as one for the country and the global community.

He lacks every possible trait that makes a person an effective leader. He has neither the temperament nor the intellectual depth required.

1/
In fact, I believe that Sanders could easily become Trump II. While they share little in the way of common belief, they are remarkably similar in tone and temperament. I have no doubt in fact that Sanders would use Trump's illegal administrative example as precedent.

2/
I can't begin to convey how dangerous that would be for the United States going. Though Sanders is not the lawless villain that Trump is, he could argue that Trump's Presidency and his acts during that time establish precedent and therefore affirm legality. Specious? D'uh.

3/
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!