Smashboard Profile picture
Sep 15, 2020 12 tweets 4 min read Read on X
#Thread Why we prefer the terms “disabled" or "person with a disability” by @Srishhhh_tea & @ananay__
Terms such as "specially/differently-abled" or "divyaang" actually do less good and more harm. We find these terms derogatory. Well-intentioned as they may be, they have roots in ableist notions and imply that having a disability is bad.
When a person very clearly tells you that they prefer the terms "disabled" or "person with a disability" and if you start able-splaining them and ask them to use a different term, you are, in a way, denying the fact that they are disabled.
By imposing other terms on us that put us on a pedestal, you're also denying the accommodations, the needs, that come with disabilities. Even if it's unintentional, you're actually running away from your responsibility and accountability.
It is generally assumed that disability should be hidden or not be talked of as it's wrong/incorrect/bad. By calling ourselves disabled, we not only acknowledge our disabilities but we also imply that it's a part of us & makes us who we are. We aren't ashamed of our disabilities.
It takes months, even years for us to learn to take pride in being disabled. Don't force us to think otherwise, please? Please don't disregard our identities. Stop putting us on pedestals. Instead, hear us out, validate our identities and support us.
Applying alternative terms to our disability won't change the fact that we are disabled. These terms only serve to erase the ongoing oppression of disabled people by ableist folx. Non-disabled people created this language and it's important to unlearn the stereotypes they imply.
There are things we aren't able to do or things we have to do differently that require more effort. But at the same time, we also need to acknowledge the fact that we are in fact disabled. And calling ourselves by any other alternative term won't change that.
We should start using the term “disabled” more often to normalise and de-stigmatize the negativity attached to disability.
There are no “special needs". This narrative distorts the fact that discriminatory & regressive practices and policies mostly cater unfairly to the needs of the able-bodied while making spaces inaccessible to people with disabilities.
Disabled people are not "inspirational" and we are not here to make able-bodied people good about themselves. So please stop being patronising or extra nice to us.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Smashboard

Smashboard Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Smashboard_

Dec 22, 2021
#Thread Urban Company, an Indian home services provider, is suing its women partners (mostly offering beauty services) who have been protesting for over 2 months against low wages, poor working conditions, & high commissions. There are many reasons to support the workers.
The company has called the protests “illegal” and has sought an injunction to make the protestors vacate the company’s premises. But protesting is every worker’s right and calling protests illegal is undemocratic.

scroll.in/latest/1013386…
Despite beauty and wellness services accounting for around 55% of the company’s revenue in 2020, the women workers at UC faced increasing exploitation and safety concerns.

botpopuli.net/beauty-platfor…
Read 18 tweets
Dec 21, 2021
#Thread In the wake of the sexual assault allegations against “Sex and the City” actor Chris Noth (who played the character “Big”), let’s address some of the recent questions being raised about #MeToo.
Many (including feminists) have started saying how naming perpetrators publicly is driven by a desire for revenge. This is a highly problematic stance.
When a survivor names their perpetrator, they break the silence against injustice and harm done to them. The act itself is a call for justice.
Read 16 tweets
Nov 10, 2021
#Thread Fighting systems of oppression: Why #empathy must inform our actions and politics:
Systems of oppression are founded on an “us vs them” narrative. These systems thrive by subjugating those who deviate from a group's bigoted norms deemed as the "other"; seeking to dehumanise and strip "other" individuals and communities of their sense of being and livelihood.
Empathy does the opposite—it works to validate all forms of existence. Author Isabel Wilkerson in her book 'Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents' asks us to nurture 'radical empathy' to challenge structural oppression.
Read 12 tweets
Sep 27, 2021
#Thread You need to keep talking about #caste to your dominant caste family members. Staying silent makes you complicit in casteist violence. It can be challenging, of course.
- What happens when you do try?
- What strategies should you use?
- Why you should do it.
What happens when you challenge a family member about their #casteism?
- They are shocked and/or in denial
- You are afraid of hurting them or provoking their fury.
- If you are dependent on them, they might threaten to or withdraw their support
- There is a lot of discomfort
- They may not be willing to change
Read 12 tweets
Mar 4, 2021
#CallToAction This International Women’s Day, back our right to peaceful protest! Stand with these brave women attacked & arrested on trumped up charges in India- only for defending democracy. QT or RT this thread from now up to 8th March with the tags #RightToDissent #IWD2021
Disha Ravi, 22 years, Climate Rights Activist Image
Nikita Jacob, 30 years, Lawyer, Climate Rights Activist Image
Read 21 tweets
Oct 8, 2020
YOUR ACTION IS REQUIRED TODAY!
The Indian government has set up a committee to rewrite all of our criminal laws and here's the big problem- (via @citizensspeakup)
YOUR CIVIL AND POLITICAL LIBERTIES ARE IN DANGER. Criminal laws define the limits of what we can do without fear of punishment. They are meant to have safeguards to ensure that the police, the government, and those in power can't jail, punish or kill people at will.
THERE IS A RISK OF DILUTION OF SAFEGUARDS!
All indications suggest that this committee has been set up to widen the net of criminal laws and to dilute what safeguards exist to prevent unfair prosecutions/persecution and wrongful convictions.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(