Terms such as "specially/differently-abled" or "divyaang" actually do less good and more harm. We find these terms derogatory. Well-intentioned as they may be, they have roots in ableist notions and imply that having a disability is bad.
When a person very clearly tells you that they prefer the terms "disabled" or "person with a disability" and if you start able-splaining them and ask them to use a different term, you are, in a way, denying the fact that they are disabled.
By imposing other terms on us that put us on a pedestal, you're also denying the accommodations, the needs, that come with disabilities. Even if it's unintentional, you're actually running away from your responsibility and accountability.
It is generally assumed that disability should be hidden or not be talked of as it's wrong/incorrect/bad. By calling ourselves disabled, we not only acknowledge our disabilities but we also imply that it's a part of us & makes us who we are. We aren't ashamed of our disabilities.
It takes months, even years for us to learn to take pride in being disabled. Don't force us to think otherwise, please? Please don't disregard our identities. Stop putting us on pedestals. Instead, hear us out, validate our identities and support us.
Applying alternative terms to our disability won't change the fact that we are disabled. These terms only serve to erase the ongoing oppression of disabled people by ableist folx. Non-disabled people created this language and it's important to unlearn the stereotypes they imply.
There are things we aren't able to do or things we have to do differently that require more effort. But at the same time, we also need to acknowledge the fact that we are in fact disabled. And calling ourselves by any other alternative term won't change that.
We should start using the term “disabled” more often to normalise and de-stigmatize the negativity attached to disability.
There are no “special needs". This narrative distorts the fact that discriminatory & regressive practices and policies mostly cater unfairly to the needs of the able-bodied while making spaces inaccessible to people with disabilities.
Disabled people are not "inspirational" and we are not here to make able-bodied people good about themselves. So please stop being patronising or extra nice to us.
#Thread Urban Company, an Indian home services provider, is suing its women partners (mostly offering beauty services) who have been protesting for over 2 months against low wages, poor working conditions, & high commissions. There are many reasons to support the workers.
The company has called the protests “illegal” and has sought an injunction to make the protestors vacate the company’s premises. But protesting is every worker’s right and calling protests illegal is undemocratic.
Despite beauty and wellness services accounting for around 55% of the company’s revenue in 2020, the women workers at UC faced increasing exploitation and safety concerns.
#Thread In the wake of the sexual assault allegations against “Sex and the City” actor Chris Noth (who played the character “Big”), let’s address some of the recent questions being raised about #MeToo.
Many (including feminists) have started saying how naming perpetrators publicly is driven by a desire for revenge. This is a highly problematic stance.
When a survivor names their perpetrator, they break the silence against injustice and harm done to them. The act itself is a call for justice.
#Thread Fighting systems of oppression: Why #empathy must inform our actions and politics:
Systems of oppression are founded on an “us vs them” narrative. These systems thrive by subjugating those who deviate from a group's bigoted norms deemed as the "other"; seeking to dehumanise and strip "other" individuals and communities of their sense of being and livelihood.
Empathy does the opposite—it works to validate all forms of existence. Author Isabel Wilkerson in her book 'Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents' asks us to nurture 'radical empathy' to challenge structural oppression.
#Thread You need to keep talking about #caste to your dominant caste family members. Staying silent makes you complicit in casteist violence. It can be challenging, of course.
- What happens when you do try?
- What strategies should you use?
- Why you should do it.
What happens when you challenge a family member about their #casteism?
- They are shocked and/or in denial
- You are afraid of hurting them or provoking their fury.
- If you are dependent on them, they might threaten to or withdraw their support
- There is a lot of discomfort
- They may not be willing to change
#CallToAction This International Women’s Day, back our right to peaceful protest! Stand with these brave women attacked & arrested on trumped up charges in India- only for defending democracy. QT or RT this thread from now up to 8th March with the tags #RightToDissent#IWD2021
Disha Ravi, 22 years, Climate Rights Activist
Nikita Jacob, 30 years, Lawyer, Climate Rights Activist
YOUR ACTION IS REQUIRED TODAY!
The Indian government has set up a committee to rewrite all of our criminal laws and here's the big problem- (via @citizensspeakup)
YOUR CIVIL AND POLITICAL LIBERTIES ARE IN DANGER. Criminal laws define the limits of what we can do without fear of punishment. They are meant to have safeguards to ensure that the police, the government, and those in power can't jail, punish or kill people at will.
THERE IS A RISK OF DILUTION OF SAFEGUARDS!
All indications suggest that this committee has been set up to widen the net of criminal laws and to dilute what safeguards exist to prevent unfair prosecutions/persecution and wrongful convictions.