A 2016 study found that the sharp decline in the number of working-class @UKLabour MPs had - entirely predictably - caused a slump in support among voters with similar backgrounds,
The study says Neil Kinnock & Tony Blair made a deliberate & concerted effort to select “more & more middle-class candidates to run for office during the 1980s & 1990s as part of an effort to rebrand,” resulting in success at the ballot box.
But the study claimed that the “conscious electoral strategy” of reducing working-class MPs stored up intractable problems for @UKLabour - played out with the rise of UKIP & Brexit - as working-class voters, who initially simply didn’t vote in response, sought an alternative.
Working-class people are much more likely than middle-class people to vote @UKLabour when the party contains a substantial number of working-class MPs, and variation over time in the number of working-class Labour MPs closely tracks the strength of such class voting".
Even when other factors were controlled, the number of MPs from poorer backgrounds had an effect.
The fact that 37% of Labour MPs came from a manual occupational background in 1964 but just 7% did in 2015 had profoundly harmed the party’s image among its traditional voters.
“The research showed that as @UKLabour candidates became more middle class, many working-class people simply stopped voting. For the last 20-30 years we have had a picture of gradually growing working-class abstention": people felt Labour was no longer representing them.
"They became alienated from the political process – and that went unnoticed for quite some time. But these alienated voters are fertile territory for being remobilised,” & that is why they were drawn to UKIP and then – more clearly – the vote for Brexit.
“It is very difficult for @UKLabour to rebuild the connection in a credible way. The party needs to reassess what its social identity is – who it wants to represent: the disaffected working-class voters in the north or the more liberal middle classes".
This STILL a problem that the @UKLabour leadership shows little sign of explicitly engaging in. Meanwhile the @Conservatives have wisely increased the number of working class MPs, while Labour flaps about. Occasionally dropping words like 'patriotism' isn't going to cut it.
I think @UKLabour is still struggling to define a strong, clear identity.
The original shift away from poorer candidates was started by Kinnock as part of an effort to break links with the unions, and disassociate with working-class radicalism - now it looks like a BIG mistake.
His research found that the problem was most acute with wealthy candidates, finding that they tended to “particularly repel” the working classes, because they were not seen as "approachable." Hence the being "intensely relaxed" about the grotesque wealth accumulated at the top 1%
“MPs from privileged backgrounds are perceived as less ‘in touch’ by working-class voters, who regard a pledge to stand up for the underprivileged as more credible coming from someone whose own background is modest than a similar promise coming from the child of millionaires".
Political parties had rightly tried hard to increase the representation of women, ethnic minorities and young people in Westminster. “But the representation of those groups has been growing over time, while the representation of working-class MPs has been falling".
Jonathan Ashworth said: “This is a problem for politics across the piste, but the @UKLabour party needs to increase its efforts to find candidates who come from the communities we want to represent. That is more working-class, female & more black & ethnic minority candidates.”
I think @UKLabour members & supporters have a right to know what the Party's strategy is.
I'm getting fed up of waiting, of not knowing, & I get the impression that Labour has just gone back to the formula used by New Labour - but we're in a very different country & world now.
I see concerning signs that @UKLabour is losing support from important voters: from many w/c people who feel alienated, unrepresented & ignored; from the many women concerned about "self-ID"; from those concerned about climate-change; & especially from millions of voters who were
inspired to become Politically engaged by @UKLabour's more "radical" agenda (normal across much of western Europe), concerned with making society MUCH fairer & MUCH greener, primarily by tackling the greed & growing unchecked power of corporations, & grotesque wealth inequality.
We need a @UKLabour Party willing to tackle greed & corruption, which reduces division, which represents the 99% (not the 1%), which promotes secure jobs & fair pay for ALL workers, helps those in need & delivers a functional, impartial legal system which treats EVERYONE equally.
If you're STILL unconcerned about foreign billionaires investing in the tech companies, media platforms, think tanks & new political parties dividing Britain by scapegoating minorities & demonising anyone or anything Left of the BNP or Britain First, you don't know 1930s history.
The US Right have been convincing themselves that "Liberals" or "Leftists" are EVIL since the 1950s & now, under Steve Bannon's guidance, this strategy has been imported wholesale to the UK, rolled out across the ENTIRE media & is now the main Govt policy. washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/july-…
Deregulated free-market capitalism, combined with antiquated electoral systems, have led the #UK, #USA & many other large western economies to become grotesquely unequal, dangerously polarised & unstable failing states, led by manipulative, sadistic & divisive populist liars.
Steve Bannon's pal Robert Mercer is a US hedge fund billionaire, early AI developer & former main investor in Cambridge Analytica.
He played a key role in Brexit by donating data analytics services to Nigel Farage. He was a major funder of Breitbart News & Trump's 2016 campaign.
In 2016, far-right billionaire & @Facebook board member Peter Thiel met with white nationalist Kevin DeAnna, who has called for "the formation of an ethnostate, the great dream of the White Republic". He's also on the #Palantir board.
In November 2019, The Jewish Chronicle published a ruling by IPSO that it had breached Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the Editors’ Code of Practice in relation to a number of claims over four articles about a @UKLabour member published in February and March 2019...
IPSO also expressed significant concerns about the JC's handling of this complaint in that it had failed repeatedly to answer questions put to it by IPSO & considered that the publication's conduct during IPSO's investigation was unacceptable.
Bauman argues that many share a sense of being left behind, abandoned, ignored (not ‘listened to’) & made redundant. This demise is blamed on traditional political elites, the MSM, foreign foes, & narratives frequently saturated with elaborate theories of conspiracy & treason.
It's also the outcome of a dramatic U-turn in the public mindset: “from investing public hopes of improvement in the uncertain and ever-too-obviously untrustworthy future, to re-investing them in the vaguely remembered past, valued for its assumed stability & so trustworthiness”.
Ruth Wodak is a brilliant linguist who has been analysing far-right populist discourse for decades.
In the context of the latest "migrant crisis" & the demonization of refugees by those on the Right, everyone would benefit from her analysis & insights.
Many of the issue-related arguments, metaphors and other rhetorical tropes as well as discursive strategies of exclusion from around 1989 can be discerned once more in the discourses surrounding the refugee movement (the so-called ‘refugee crisis’).
Such discourses and argumentation schemes are implemented by the respective far-right populist parties and their politicians, including Donald Trump, Nigel Farage’s Brexit Party & Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz.
What kinds of strategies are we dealing with here?
Despite @BBCNews & @BBCPolitics being full of right-wing editors & presenters who worked tirelessly to stop Corbyn, right-wingers have relentlessly attacked the @BBC for being left-wing, paving the way for two new Fox News style TV channels.
One group is promising a news channel “distinctly different from the out-of-touch incumbents” & has already been awarded a licence to broadcast by Ofcom, under the name “GB News”.
Its founder has said the @BBC is a “disgrace” that “is bad for Britain on so many levels".
'GB News' is the work of company All Perspectives, controlled by two British-American executives associated with the US billionaire John Malone - yet another libertarian billionaire, seemingly intent on replacing governments with 'more efficient' (& profitable) corporations.