Everyone knows Brahma and Shiva are great gods. But Yama is only next to them in greatness of knowledge. As a dedication to Lord Yama, here is a translation of the beautiful yamāṣtaka by Savitri from brahmavaivarta purāṇa. Translation done in a hurry, so excuse errors if any.+
[Savitri: Yama, who are Dharma personified! Praise of Hari, speaking about his stories or listening to them, result in purification of one's lineage. It removes birth & death.]+
dānānāṃ ca vratānāṃ ca siddhīnāṃ tapasāṃ param| yōgānāṃ caiva vēdānāṃ sēvanaṃ kīrtanaṃ harēḥ||
[Higher than charity, vows, sacrifices, penances, meditation, study of the Vedas is the praise of Lord Hari]+
muktatvamamaratvaṃ ca sarvasiddhitvamēva vā| śrīkṛṣṇasēvanasyaiva kalāṃ nārhanti ṣōḍaśīm
[Bliss of individual self gained by freedom from distress of prakrti, devatva & yoga-siddhi is not equal to 1/16th part of services to Lord of Sri who sports in bliss of creation]+
bhajāmi kēna vidhinā śrīkṛṣṇaṃ prakṛtēḥ param| mūḍhāṃ māmabalāṃ tāta vada vēdavidāṃ vara
[Lord who knows the Veda! Please tell me about method for worship of that Lord of Sri w/ a blackish complexion. To me who am ignorant & without eligibility as I am a woman]+
[Long ago, Sūrya went to Puṣkara Kshetra & meditated on Lord Nārāyaṇa called “dharma” as he is the means. He got a son who is an amśa of Nārāyaṇa, called dharmarāja.]+
[Lord Yama has impartiality towards all beings despite dispensing punishment and he sees the merits and demerits of all (thus reckons their punishments).....]
[...He is thus known as “Saman” or one who calms the minds of all by his instructions on Hari. I bow to him]
The idea is, as he knows the natures of all, and is impartial, he is an ideal one to be resorted to for knowledge.+
[He who ends lives of beings in the world by his assistant Mrityu, He who by virtue of measuring punishments acc to karmas, brings their sinful actions to an end, I worship him.]+
[He bears the rod of authority (to dole out punishments) & is the rod of chastisement for sinners as a means to purify them....]+
[... I worship he who sustains “daṇḍa” (daṇḍadharaṃ) which is the administration of rules of dharma, the Ruler of all beings whose actions are sinful.]+
viśvē ca kalayatyēva sarvāyuścāpi santatam| atīva durnivāryaṃ ca taṃ kālaṃ praṇamāmyaham||
[He who measures actions of all beings in the Universe (as sinful or not) & their lives (by his assistant Mrtiyu), who is irresistible for sinnes, I bow down to that Lord of Death]+
[He (ie, Nārāyaṇa) provides fruits of actions for those doing austerities to attain svarga etc (tapasvī), those meditating on Viṣṇu (Vaiṣṇava)...]+
[...those doing karma yoga to realize the self (dharmī), jnāna-yogīs with controlled internal senses & organs to meditate on the self (saṃyamī vijitēndriyaḥ). I bow down to the controller of all (Yama), who gives the fruits of actions to the bound selves.]+
That shloka superimposed qualities of Brahman (Nārāyaṇa) on Yama as it talked about mokshaphala as well. The brahma sūtra brahmadhrṣtiutkarṣāt says that any pure object can be meditated as a symbol of Brahman by superimposing qualities on it.+
If you are wondering how a woman can meditate in such manner as she lacks eligibility, ans is she is not doing that meditation but merely showing Yama can be meditated as a symbol. Next shloka states he can be meditated as Brahman since he is pure, on account of being a devotee+
[The one who is contented in experience of his own self that is Nārāyaṇa, cognizant of all dharmās, an ally to all as he advises them on Brahman, who does pure acts...]+
[...I bow to that Lord whose friend or well-wisher (in the form of giving approval for action) is Nārāyaṇa called “puṇya”, giving anguish to sinners.]+
[Thus speaking, Savitri bowed in reverence to Yama, upon her praise of Viṣṇu (as Yama’s innerself) which is a fruit of her actions dedicated to the Lord….]
Thus ends the stuti.+
Small dedication to the Lord of Death, who gives knowledge of Hari, instructed Nachiketa, Savitri and Mudgala and who is also recognized by the Azhwars as a knower of Brahman.//
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This interested me so I went through the section. Genuine enough+
If you take the time to understand that names in sahasranAmAs & shatanAmAs are not random but telling a story, ie, onnected to each other, you would understand that it is not proper to jump into a name and interpret it as per layman understanding. So let me explain these names+
sarvayajñādhipō yajvā jarāmaraṇavarjitaḥ ।
[The One who presides over all sacrifices (as the object of worship), the One who performs sacrifices for those who cannot do so (as the means of worship), who is devoid of birth and death despite being the antaryAmin]+
A few simple points I will summarize for the benefit of those who have an open mind. You can always ask if you have Qs without a prejudice.
1) sthala purANAs do not have equal authority as main texts & must be gauged on their merit to see if they agree with higher texts
2) rAma did not worship Shiva at rAmeShvara as per Valmiki, though he did invoke shiva in his nitya-naimittika karmAs. That is proper.
3) nArAyaNa is a term that denotes only Parabrahman everywhere. In contrast, terms like Rudra, Insra, Chandra etc, denote various objects+
4) As an example, rudra denotes the state of experience of the self in Vayu purANa and desire (kAma) in MB (kAShyapa-Aila samvAda). "bhava" and "sharva" denote mind and intellect in atharva Veda. In contrast, nArAyaNa only denotes the supreme Brahman.+
[Mind without wealth (intellect), whose eye is shut (not seeing Brahman)! Go to the beautiful hill, crying out (his name). We will cause you to hide from Saṃsāra, by these Tīrthās of the hill that withers all karmas.]
One should understand that we have no agendas in saying rAma did not worship Shiva as per VR. It doesn't matter to us who he worshipped, since Valmiki is clear about his supremacy. But we have to follow what the text says, the context & the commentaries+
The rAmeShvara linga prathiShta only occurs in the sthala-purANa of the Shiva temple as well some of the Shaiva purANaAs. Commentors of the rAmAyaNa like Govindaraja declare that it is merely said in those purANAs to exalt Shiva and not to declare historicity of the event+
The only possible shloka which may be construed in such a vein is when rAma tells sIta how he managed to construct setu - atra puurvaM mahAdevaH prasAdamakarotprabhuH
We look at two commentators here - Maheshvara Tirtha (advaitin) and Govindaraja (Vishishtadvaitain)+
pramAdAd vA asurAh parAbhavan apramAdAd brahmabhUtAh surASca
[AsurAs failed to realize true nature of the self due to error of considering body as the self (pramAda). Devas, by careful discrimination of self & body (apramAda) attained the nature of the self, similar to Brahman]+
The above describes the episode of Indra and Virochana learning from PrajApati in the Chandogya (pratyagAtma vidya). Virochana mistook the teachings as self = body, while Indra understood the self as different from the body.+
As I said here, the sanat sujAtiyam discourses on nature of the jIvAtman. ParamAtman is described too, but only as a means to attain jIvAnubhava. A few tongue twisting shlokAs that some have tried to interpret (unsuccessfully) - advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advai…
[Not any acts like seeing, speaking, hearing about jIvAtma (vedAnAm), is capable of knowing it truly. By knowledge in form of seeing differences (vedena), one can't know the nature of self that is identical in all (vedam) & the body belonging to it, so distinct from it (vedyam)]+