Are higher-protein diets bad for your bones?

A thread.

1/17
A possibly negative aspect of higher protein intake is related to bone health and the possible increase in dietary acid load from it.

This is called the acid ash hypothesis.

2/17
This holds that increased protein intake (and particularily sulfur-containing amino acids) leads to a higher dietary acid load, which is regulated by the release of alkalizing compounds derived from bone, resulting in bone resorption, osteoporosis and hypercalcuria.

3/17
However, in this study, bone mineral density was not correlated with the ratio of animal to plant protein intake, despite the fact that animal protein provides acid precursors, while vegetables provide base precursors not found in animal foods.

doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/7…

4/17
Worse still, the so-called acid ash hypothesis has been examined in meta-analyses and found to lack support.

5/17
This meta-analysis found that, in contrast to the acid ash hypothesis, higher phosphate intake was associated with decreased urinary calcium and increased calcium retention.

doi.org/10.1186/1475-2…

6/17
In this analysis, which used the Bradford/Hill criteria to test causality, it was clear that the association between dietary acid load and osteoporotic bone disease was not supported by evidence...

doi.org/10.1186/1475-2…

7/17
...while in a recent analysis conducted by the US National Osteoporosis Foundation, the authors concluded that there are positive rather than negative trends in bone density in most areas of the bone when on a high-protein diet.

doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.1…

8/17
Consistent with this conclusion, it has been suggested that dietary protein supports bone health, but this is probably only the case when calcium intake is adequate.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/p…

9/17
In a 6-month intervention exercise-trained women, the authors found that a high-protein diet (2.8g/kg per day) had no effect on whole body bone mineral density, lumbar bone mineral density, or T-scores vs the control group.

doi.org/10.1186/s12970…

10/17
In a 16-week diet and exercise weight loss program, consuming dairy foods and higher protein, combined with adequate calcium and vitamin D intake, resulted in improved bone health and metabolic health indicators in overweight and obese young women.

doi.org/10.1210/jc.201…

11/17
After all, the correlation between changes in calcium excretion and changes in urinary acid excretion is not is not evidence that the source of the excreted calcium is bone or that this calciuria contributes to the development of osteoporosis.

12/17
In fact, data from a dual stable calcium isotope study suggest that the main source of increased urinary calcium from a high-protein diet comes from increased dietary calcium absorption rather than bone resorption.

doi.org/10.1210/jc.200…

14/17
Therefore, in general, it seems that protein not only does not harm bones, but it is an essential nutrient for bone health.

doi.org/10.1080/073157…

15/17
Its intake seems to have a positive effect on calcium balance and therefore the maintenance of bone mineral density.

doi.org/10.1038/oby.20…

16/17
In conclusion, not only is there lack of evidence linking higher dietary protein intake to poor bone health, it may be wise to suggest older men and women (the part of the population most susceptible to osteoporosis) consume a high protein diet to optimize bone mass.

17/17

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nick Krontiris

Nick Krontiris Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nick_krontiris

14 Aug
The optimal protein intake for muscle protein synthesis seems to be around ~160g per day, a thread:
Lemon et al, 2017

doi.org/10.3945/jn.116…

The breakpoint here was 1.7g/kg of protein per day (The upper 95% CI of the breakpoint was at 2.2g and the lower CI was 1.2g) Image
Roberts et al, 2018

doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2…

No benefit from protein intakes higher than 1.6g/kg per day
Read 14 tweets
14 Jun
What affects your triglycerides, your glycemic and your insulin responses to a meal?

This one recruited twins and unrelated healthy adults in an effort to derive algorithms that predict an individual’s postprandial metabolic responses and this is what they found.
Postprandial tryglycerides response to a meal depends on:
Postprandial glucose response to a meal depends on:
Read 5 tweets
11 Jun
CIM you guise
And if you remove the low-protein diets, it goes like this:
Fat mass went like this, weird huh
Read 31 tweets
21 May
"mTOR is bad"

Your body obviously does not need that pesky survival and apoptosis pathways anyway.

Might as well stop eating altogether. I'm sure you'll become a centenarian.
Read 13 tweets
7 Jul 19
In simple term, the Randle Cycle suggests that increased fatty acid β-oxidation contributes to insulin resistance.
Even though the existence of the Randle Cycle in the heart has been clearly
demonstrated, some skeptics have challenged whether it actually exists in skeletal muscle.
But the methodology of those papers was flawed and subsequent research vindicated Philip Randle.
Read 15 tweets
25 May 19
Association of vitamin K with cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

doi.org/10.1007/s00394…

#nutrition #VitaminK #CVD #CHD
- "Our results suggested that higher dietary phylloquinone and menaquinone intakes were consistently associated with a lower risk of total CHD, and higher dp-ucMGP concentration was associated with a higher risk of all-cause and CVD mortality...
"...In general, these data support potential benefts of vitamin K on the prevention of CVD events and all-cause mortality"
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!