1/ Q: Did a recent CDC study show that 85% of people who wear masks get COVID?

A: No. The @CDCgov study showed that close contact with people who had #COVID or visiting locations that offered on-site eating & drinking were associated with getting COVID. cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/6…
2/ This study does not offer any information about whether wearing a mask is a risk factor for getting #COVID19.

So where does this 85% figure come from?
3/ In the study, they also reported that 85% of those who tested positive for COVID-19 said they had worn a mask "always" or “often” & that 88.7% of those who tested negative for COVID-19 said they had worn a mask either "always" or “often”.
4/ This DOES NOT MEAN that 85% of people who wore masks got COVID-19. It actually means there wasn’t much difference in the proportion of cases & non-cases that reported wearing masks “always” or “often”.
5/ Or if anything, a slightly greater proportion of people who DIDN'T GET #COVID19 reported wearing masks frequently, compared to those who got COVID-19.
6/ Importantly, this study wasn’t intended to assess the effect of wearing face masks on getting infected with COVID-19 in the first place & several limitations to how the data was collected make it challenging to make conclusions about this.
7/ 1️⃣ While they reported how many cases & non-cases reported wearing masks “always” or “often”, we don’t actually know anything about how often they took them on or off, or whether they wore them over their nose & mouth.
8/ Individuals who reported “always” or “often” wearing a mask might not actually have done much mask wearing in practice. This means the level of mask use reported by individuals in the study might be misclassified (epidemiologists refer to this as measurement error).
9/ 2️⃣ Individuals were asked about their mask use AFTER finding out if they had COVID-19 or not. Knowing whether you have COVID-19 might influence your reporting of how often you wore masks in the past 14 days.
10/ For example, cases of COVID-19 may over-report mask use compared to non-cases because they are worried about being perceived as not taking the correct precautions (epidemiologists refer to this as reporting bias).
11/ Those who don’t have COVID-19 might also be less likely to remember their exact mask use because they aren’t thinking about it to the same extent as cases (epidemiologists refer to this as recall bias).
12/ 3️⃣ Cases of #COVID19 were more likely to report eating out in restaurants which are settings where masks are required, but people take them on & off to eat, & also more likely to report being in close contact with a case of COVID-19.
13/ For these reasons, any assessment of the association between mask use & becoming a case of #COVID, would need to take into account the extent to which mask wearers dined out or didn’t social distance from cases of COVID-19, which isn’t the case.
14/ Overall, the way the data was collected & the analyses that were reported in this study makes it hard to say anything conclusive about whether mask use was associated with being a case of COVID-19, & importantly, that WASN’T THE POINT of the investigation.
15/ What this study DOES confirm is that being in close contact with those infected with COVID-19 & spending time in settings where masks might be taken on/off frequently such as restaurants IS associated with being a case of COVID-19.
cnn.com/.../fact-check…...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dear Pandemic

Dear Pandemic Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DearPandemic

22 Oct
1/ Q: I’m feeling anxious… & bored at the same time. Is this normal? Is there a solution?

A: Welcome to the paradoxical feeling of acedia – an old word used to describe that very now feeling of apathetic restlessness. Good news: There are evidence-based ways to fight back.
2/ Background:
Early Christian monks called acedia the “noonday demon” – the tough feelings you feel where you are alone, feeling listless & wonder why the day is dragging on forever. bit.ly/2Hq167u
3/ Modern author & poet Kathleen Norris (@knorriseyt) describes acedia as a feeling of restlessness, seeing the future as overwhelming & seeing the work ahead as never-ending.

Do you miss hanging out with people, yet cringe at the prospect of yet another Zoom happy hour?
Read 11 tweets
14 Oct
1/ Are there really false-positives from COVID tests? If so, how is it possible for a test to pick up something that is not there?

A: Yep, they exist. Image Credit: Jernej Furman, focusonmore.com
2/ Two types of tests are commonly used to identify an active #COVID19 infection, & both of them can occasionally lead to a “false-positive” result, or a positive test result when there is actually no infection present.
3/ The two types of tests are:
1. PCR tests 🧬, which detect itty bitty pieces of the virus’ genetic material, &
2. Antigen tests 🦠, which detect signature proteins on the outside of the virus. (Note: Don’t confuse antigen with antibody tests 🩸 ! That's different.)
Read 10 tweets
13 Oct
1/ Q: What do you think of the idea of “focused protection” or “shielding” the vulnerable so that everyone else can get on with normal life?

A: We *wish* it were this easy, but sadly it’s not.
2/ While this approach sounds appealing on the surface, the deeper you dig the more the argument folds in on itself.

Let me explain...
3/ 👉The death and hospitalization toll even in under 65s would be staggering

👉No consideration of waning immunity and re-infection

👉No mention of impact of “Long Covid” for millions infected

👉Cordoning off of a large percentage of the population is not feasible
Read 31 tweets
13 Oct
1/ What do we do when college-age children come home at #Thanksgiving? Should they come home?

A: “Come Home & Stay Home” or “Don’t Come Home” are your best options. Coming home just for the Thanksgiving holiday & then returning to campus is *not* a good plan. p/c: Dan Renzetti
2/ Some of your options are clearly better than others from a #COVID safety perspective. Before we go through those options, we want to highlight a common mental bias to which we are all susceptible: We underestimate the risk of getting COVID from people we know and love.
3/ Dr. Birx mentioned this in a recent speech, as she noted increasing case counts that are likely driven by small gatherings of family. “We take down our guard when we are with people we know... & we assume if we know you, you couldn’t have COVID.”
bit.ly/2H4ykJK
Read 12 tweets
11 Oct
1/ Q: How can I boost my immune system?

A: Today we focus on the importance of sleep health as an evidence-based strategy for improving your immune system during the COVID-19 pandemic.
2/ * Long-term sleep deficiency is associated with a range of co-morbidities (type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, dementia) that put you at higher susceptibility & more severe outcomes of COVID-19.
3/ You can reduce your risk factors for these comorbidities by practicing good health behaviors, such as prioritizing sleep, exercise, and a diet rich in fruits and vegetables) Even little changes in lifestyle can add up over time.
Read 7 tweets
6 Oct
1/ Q: Is it true that #Sweden has gotten to herd immunity without lockdown? Should we all be doing what they are doing?

A: No, Sweden has not reached herd immunity, nor have they fared well economically or with respect to COVID-19 mortality.
2/ While there has been a fascination with being Sweden during this pandemic, there are many misconceptions about their experience that are worth clearing up:
2/ *Myth 1*: Sweden didn’t place restrictions on activities due to #COVID19

*Reality*: While it’s true there was no nationwide mandatory lockdowns as in Spain, Italy, the UK & US, Sweden did have a “lockdown lite."
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!