Yesterday's work seems to have garnered a fair amount of interest. Just using Twitter's numbers, it did well, relative to my typical reach. I am honored and grateful.
2) Yet, as I wrote it, and in the questions that thoughtful readers gave me after, I realized I'd left some important gaps uncovered. My hope, today, is to fill those gaps. I hope I can get this done in just today's thread, so 2 and done!
3) Let's begin with a little clarification of credit. First, I tagged and thanked @tamaraleighllc, but failed to say why! The reason is, she both introduced me to @Johnheretohelp and forwarded the thread he gave us about China. Thanks again, Gal. You're the best!
4) Here's John's thread. You really do want to read it!
5) As I shared with John, yesterday, I've ONLY been following the China story since December 2019, so I'm a complete newbie. I didn't ask him, but I bet he's been following for many, many years. His cogent analysis indicates great depths of comprehension.
6) Here's another dynamic I have to share. Many of you, who've been following me since December 2019 or before, may remember my WTO analyses back then. But, many of you hadn't seen my work yet, and I have to review it for context and significance.
7) Here's how China got onto my radar in December 2019. There I was, innocently watching the Bret Baier show, my favorite segment (except for when I hate it) the panel. On that day, a throwaway line was thrown out. "By the way, Trump killed the WTO today." No explanation.
8) In a small tribute to my great friend @TPCLJ, this is EXACTLY what went through my mind in that moment. Check this. It's worth your time, I promise!
9) Say what? Trump killed the WTO? How is that even possible? And what in tarnation is the damned WTO? Should I care? Was this good, bad, unimportant? And how does something like the WTO get killed? How is that even possible?
10) Truly to make a long story short, the WTO is the ultimate globalist institution. It manages all members states trade treaties and adjudicates their conflicts. Wile power. Well, until Trump killed it. I can't take the time to go over how, but it was GENIUS!
11) Okay, let me try, quick...
The WTO has two courts, a main court and an appellate court. Any serious conflict always went (note past tense) to the appellate court. It was composed of - how many? - I think 9 jurors, with quorum at 3.
12) Thing is, the member nations have a say in who is on the court, and Trump began, from day one, back in 2017, to use his veto power over confirmed nominees to STOP anyone from being confirmed to the appellate court. On two year terms, it took till 2019 to empty out the court!
13) An empty appeals court can hear NO appeals. Thus, dead. Still there, but now a zombie institution. Okay, but why is this so important? Well, it was the WTO that ensured China ALL its trade advantages against the rest of the world. It was China's great shield.
14) Obviously - I hope! - China realized all the way back in 2017 that they were under existential threat from Trump and the collapse of the WTO. So, they began formulating a new stage of war against us. I believe it took me until February of this year to see the war's structure.
15) In February, I laid out the following 4 stages of their warfare against us:
1) Biological 2) Economic 3) Social 4) Military
This is a damn fine analysis, but it misses a FUNDAMENTAL step.
16) Here's a better, an enhanced model:
1) Biological 2) Economic 3) Social 4) Political 5) Military
There may well be steps between 4 and 5 I have not yet seen. But, this is a fuller, better model of their war strategy.
17) I know why I failed to see the necessary step 4, back then. I knew NOTHING of Biden's corruption at the time. I had no idea he'd actually win the nomination of his party. I did not know how utterly China had Biden in its pocket.
18) To my eye now, and with @Johnheretohelp's aid, I understand that Biden is nothing other than China's candidate. That is all he is. He is the true, if not the original Manchurian Candidate. He is 100% owned by China. That's what America has to face, right now.
It's time for a short break. I'll be right back...
19) The other great gap in yesterday's work was the reference to @TuckerCarlson and his nightly work on the Biden Corruption/High Tech Censorship scandal. In but a word, this is the iceberg that Biden Titanic has smashed into. On this basis, I'm saying...he's done.
20) Who ever heard of a candidate "putting a lid on campaigning?" I never heard of such a thing. I saw Clinton2 do it, but we didn't call it back then in the ancient days of 2016. She just didn't get over her hangover, couldn't go anywhere. We all knew that.
21) But what does a conscious, purposeful decision to NOT campaign SHOUT to the entire world? Here's a candidate in internal implosion. He just doesn't have what it takes to face the people or meet the press, even HIS press, the kindest, softest, nicest press in history.
22) The facts are simple. Hunter Biden flies all over planet earth with daddy on Airforce 2. It's a nice chariot. You walk off and big, important people pay heed to you. A great conversation opener. It thaws the ice with people who count.
23) You sit down to the best Dim Sum on earth and you lean forward, ask your new buddy, what's an introduction to the VPOTUS worth to you? Give me a number. Number in hand you smack down the delicious food, chased with unbelievably great rice wine. Delicious!
24) A few weeks later, you're in a partnership with the CCP to the tune of $1.5 BILLION. Wow. And what's China get? No tariffs and such. What's that worth? Trillions. China knows how to negotiate. Hell, they may have invented the art. Happy, happy, we're all happy.
25) Whoops! The negotiator is a reprobate coke fiend. Sniff, sniff, pinch your nostrils and wipe your gums for any remaining granules. A coke fiend. He's evidently got a lap top. Anyone remember Weiner, the most well named man on earth? He had a laptop too!
26) Whoops again! I forgot where I left my laptop for its repairs and can't be bothered to pick it up. Whoa. Upset owner. FBI - 100% corrupt FBI - takes temporary possession. Gives it back. Owner of shop, upset, calls Rudi Giuliani. Wow! Who'd a thunk? Certainly NOT Hunter!
27) Okay, all this is still manageable. The media LOVES us and will cover all this up. No problem. Alas. Along comes the last remaining honest newspaper in America, interestingly, the longest standing paper where a scoop still matters. Wow!
28) We have the laptop from hell. Who came up with that name? Was it Steven Miller; Steve Bannon, or maybe Trump himself? Whoever did, wow, what a GREAT name. The laptop from hell. We should hashtag that!
29) Where no one else in the media was even slightly interested, the incredible @TuckerCarlson took this case on as a mission. Every night he leads with this story. What extraordinary integrity. This story shows the ultimate China Collusion Corruption, like no other.
30) Who knew? It's the VPs to watch. Al Gore. Joe Biden. They're the go to guys when selling out the nation. Next up? Kamala Harris! If they win, she'll be China's go to gal, no question whatsoever. And on our side?
31) There was Spiro Agnew for Nixon, corrupt as hell. Followed by incompetent Ford. Likely very corrupt also. And surely no man to defeat a peanut farmer from Georgia. Not good.
32) Reagan is stuck with Bush soon to be Bush41, and who's he? A former CIA director, and the most corrupt China shill imaginable. How about that? Again not good.
33) I don't know that Quayle is worth analyzing. Maybe a better guy than we let him be, but clearly not up to the fight. There was never going to be a President Quayle. Maybe not corrupt, but likely more due to incompetence than integrity.
35) No need to assess Gore more. We've done that. Oh now. Pain. Who is this Cheney guy? I used to love him. How many times have I been a total idiot? I love him no more. Allow me to let go of him like this. He too used his office for Halliburton's gain, not America's need.
36) I like Pence. I didn't used to, but I do now. I do NOT like him enough for 2024. I may change my mind. Wait, what? Yeah, just skipped over Obama/Biden. I went to Pence. I now like him, I say again. But I do not trust him. He's just a little too cool for school.
37) Does Pence actually stutter? Or, does he purposefully stutter for affect? I don't know. Do you? Assume a Trump 2020 victory. Is Pence your 2024 guy? Me? Just not sure. I could be converted. I could.
38) What I do know is this. Pence is no Trump. He may be a great number 2. But, can he handle number 1? Not too sure about that. Now, let's get back to Biden.
39) All the time, the entire time from 2007 forward, I only paid attention to Obama. I paid zero attention to Biden. He was less than nothing to me. I knew - as also did you and everyone else - that Clinton2 was the person to watch, and so watch we did.
40) How did Obama get his billions? My theory is Iran, far more than China. And boy did they buy a pig in a poke! No one anticipated Trump. Everyone anticipated Clinton2. I put Iran in Obama's portfolio.
41) And finally that brings us back to High Tech America. Let's simplify. They believe in drones. Not the ones that fly, the ones that vote. They believe in an obedient populace that is okay with their definition of truth, of news. They get to tell you.
42) That's been Tucker's great point. The Biden scandal is bad. Really, really bad. But it fails in comparison to the Free Speech scandal over it. Where's that New York Post story?
43) Facebook. Twitter. They at first deny this story its distribution. Fake news!, they cry. Simple problem. No one. Not one person denies the validity of the story. Everyone attack the messenger. No one attacks the message's truth quotient. The information is true.
44) That my friends is the real thing. If you attack the person, you need not address the truth or falsehood of his statements. That is totalitarianism, written classically. That's Tucker's point. America is a post-free speech nation, now. Post-Free Speech. Can we get it back?
45) Tucker is America's hero today. He's leading the way. I'm no longer a big FOX fan. But that they give Tucker his leed, is enough for me to still be grateful. Honor to FOX. Far more honor to Tucker.
Thread ends at #45.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I started this analysis a few days ago, and knew I'd gotten my hands on something, but wasn't quite sure what. Now I know, and show in the chart below. They call this their Periodicity Problem.
2) It takes mental discipline to read this chart. I call it the Go On 3 problem. Do we go the instant we hear 3? Or, do we wait until the word "three" is completed? Do you count from the start of something, or from its end? Believe it or not, its actually an important problem.
3) To read this chart, you need to understand some fundamental information. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7! That's one week. Seven days. And, it marks roughly one half of Dornsife's respondents. I call them Group 1. And I denote their thoughts at the END of the week.
Following all those hashtags, we begin tonight with tremendous honor to @TuckerCarlson. He is, bar none, the most courageous journalist in America today. What a hero!
2) Before we dive in, honor goes out to two others. First, @tamaraleighllc who just got her account back!!! And 2nd to @Johnheretohelp. John ALWAYS calls out the hard truth you hear from so few others. And man, does he get the China issue. His work inspires tonight's analysis.
3) We've done this before, but it's time for a review of our rogues' gallery of POTUSes who sold our American Destiny to China. I'm going to go slowly on this. You'd think we'd begin with Nixon, and maybe we should, yet, I say no. My reason follows...
Context: Anthony was riding the scooter like he was just walking on his feet. So, I gave him the bike and started working on my scootering skills - read that as lack of skills!
So here’s my question: how many of you know how to learn with your body, as opposed to your brain? It’s like this whole new universe to me! Example, leaning back changes stupas opposed to leaning forward. Who knows these things?
Anthony has 5 nothing but nets, and I haven’t hit a single basket yet, if any kind...
FedEx - Part 2 of 10, As Inspired By Dave Schneider
I have a friend. He is the Number 1 Logistician in the world. Logistician? It is one who masters all the arts of logistics. You can't imagine how many.
2) Dave's second company who's stock he wants me to analyze is FedEx. When he told me that, my first response was an idiotic yawn. I foolishly thought, 'how different from UPS is the stock motion going to be?' I thought they'd be almost identical. Ha! It's fun to be so wrong.
3) Before I start showing you charts, let's talk about method. I'm essentially the exact opposite of a day trader or a TV talking head stock analyst. You have to let me go off for a moment. When I hear their daily analysis, the stock market did this today, for that reason...
2) David has given me 10 logistics companies to analyze. UPS is the first and here we go. My standard method will be this. We take the long term max numbers, then the 5 year numbers, then this year. First the raw chart. Second my own lines.
3) I don't know if I'll always have to do this. But the time frame for each chart matters. Greatly. Our first chart, no lines drawn, shows about 20 years worth of UPS stock data. Obviously, it's a good stock!
Wanna know what keeps me up at night? Bad data does. It pisses me off. It gives me nightmares. No kidding. You get the idea that I hate bad data, right? So soothe your eyes with me here.
2) Now that is true data. Feast your eyes upon it. Take it in. You want truth? I do! This is truth. It's the real deal. It actually happened and there ain't nobody trying to mess with this image. No propaganda. No Psyop. Just raw, honest, real truth. Go slowly with me.
3) Note the time frame. We see 4 10-year points on our X axis across the bottom: 1986, 1996, 2006, 2016. We can guess we go back to an unmarked 1980, and forward to the present, so 40 years of real, honest data.