So, who joined #IS but has been ordered to keep it quite (by al-Qurashî's audio)? The keeping it quite part IMO rules out groups with a monopoly on jihâdist violence in their area. #IS has never been shy to announce such acquisitions even when this meant international scrunity. /
Cases in point would be its provinces in Libya and the Phillipines whose territorial control was crushed by bombings of international coalitions. I don't think that this approach has changed when looking at Mozambique right now. 2/
The #ISCA province is very much on the offensive and has been noted as a security risk by international actors. The military intervention of a strong local or global force is only a question of time. 3/
Strangely, local governments and area studies experts tend to deny the subordination of previously independent groups under #IS, e.g. claiming that #ISEA is actually 'Abû Sayyâf', #ISCA is the #ADF in DRC while being Ahl al-Sunnah in Mozambique. 4/
Nothing easier for those provinces than to use a local moniker to keep their pledge to #IS secret. But they don't. Their attacks are claimed on official #IS media, often including visual proof and there is abundant audio-visual material of fighters claiming #IS membership. 5/
Conquering areas, ruling them by their interpretation of Islamic law and fighting Muslims they excommunicated or non-Muslims under "a clear banner" - the #IS banner - is part and parcel of #IS ideology. 6/
All of that IMO rules out that a group without jihâdist rivals (read #AQ alligned) in their area pledged to #IS. There are only two places left, that would fit such a description anyway. 7/
There is precedent though, for jihâdist groups keeping their pledge to #IS secret while being in an area with other jihâdist actors, sometimes even in coalitions with them. Cases in point would be JMWA in Aleppo, Liwâ` Dâwûd in Idlib (both Syria) and the MSSM in Derna/Libya. 8/
A possibility would be #AQ defectors in Mâlî or Somalia who are dealing with strong #AQ affiliates and are meant to stay low until an opportunity (fight or flight) arises. The same holds true for Afghânistân and Yemen where #IS lost to local Islamist actors. 9/
When speaking about independent active jihâdist groups joining #IS there is only Syria to look at. There are clandestine groups in Idlib, likely former members of the pro-#AQ group Hurrâs ad-Dîn and the "third-way" party Tahrîr al-Shâm of Abû Muhammad al-Jawlânî. 10/
Two groups, Katâ´ib Khattâb and Ansâr Abî Bakr, have in recent months published claims of their attacks on Turkish and Russian forces under the protection of Tahrîr al-Shâm. I have previously said that
As at least a part of the radical jihâdist current in Idlib has come out with an excommunication of al-Jawlânî and #HTS using basically the same arguments as #IS, these guys are my prime candidate for the secret pledge. (see @ajaltamimiaymennjawad.org/24655/the-apos…) 12/
A final conceivable acquisition would be (parts of) a previously non-violent or apolitical violent religious group (read vigilantism or communal violence) like the Tawhîd Jamâ'ah splinter that carried out the 2019 Easter bombings in Sri Lanka. 13/
Such a group would be rather small and wait for a fight or flight moment as well, fight likely being a terrorist attack instead of an insurgency. I suppose a year from now at the latest we will know who recently pledged to #IS. 14/14
Add.: Give me the edit button already! Scrutiny it is in the first tweet.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Okay, this Europol on Telegram thing worked, easily the heaviest hit jihâdism online has ever taken. I like how most of the old channels simply lost their admins, the channels are still available as an archive. Good for research.
In the past most action was intended to wipe propaganda - especially videos - from the web. Made it somewhat annoying to search for older things but really didn't work.
This was about distribution of new propaganda. The only cases I specifically remember in the past was the 10 years 911 video of #AQ and #AQAP's Inspire (don't remember the issue) that were delayed some days due to high pressure by security services.
As @azelin just posted, a previously unknown jihâdist group - Humât al-Tawhîd - has claimed killing King Salmân b. 'Abd al-'Azîz's bodyguard 'Abd al-'Azîz al-Fagham. #KSA
@azelin The group first appeared in early September, their first statement "Fight the Allies of Satan" is dated 02 Muharram 1441. The group has since released two short video clips and a number of short infographics detailing its belief system.
@azelin The group is clearly salafî-jihâdî, rather certainly not linked to #IS, and probably also independent of #AQ. The guidelines for terrorist operations announced by the group look stricter than those of either before mentioned movements.
Okay, after the photo of the Zahrân Hâshim with a weapon in front of the well-known flag used among others by #IS and the intelligence memo mentioning him and the group blamed by the #SriLankan gov. for the attacks leaked, I think it rather likely that he was involved.
The guy has been described as pro-#IS, so the remaining question is whether this is directed or inspired. Considering that the information mentioned in the memo seems to have come from India, I believe in an Indian connection to all this.
The first group of Indians who joined #IS belonged to Ansâr al-Tawhîd fî Bilâd al-Hind. Their leader Sultân Amrâr came from the southern Indian state of Karnataka which is bordering Tamil Nadu and has a Tamil minority. His brother Muhammad is likely still around somewhere.