The Palindrome (Soros) broke FX factors down into simple logic statements (the below example is taken from "The Alchemy of Finance"). He did this in an effort to gain a better understanding of the drivers of a trend and the sustainability of that trend... /1
2/ These drivers shifts over time, from regime to regime. This is one of the reasons why the FX is notably hard to forecast. Players often key off the thing that worked during the last cycle while missing what’s driving the current one.
3/ The most recent USD bull market that kicked off in 11’ was driven by an equation that looked something like this.
DXY = US V > RoW V (rest-of-world) = ↑(i+e+m) → s↓ → e↑
US growth was stronger on a relative basis (accounting for the US premium) than RoW (US V > RoW V).
4/ As a result, the dollar benefited from numerous positive feedback loops that boosted its Total Return Equation, which is the most important factor in driving speculative flows.
5/ A number of factors are no longer supportive of the positive USD feedback loop; such as rel growth, trend in yield spreads, plus a deteriorating trade balance (T↓) and widening budget deficit (B↓). So the $DXY equation looks like this:
DXY = ↕(i+e)+↑(m)→ s↕ → e↕
6/ So the now dollar only has relative market performance (m) working in its favor. But this sole-remaining USD bull pillar of relative market performance is historically stretched. Capital concentration in the US is at all-time highs.
7/ $DXY is oversold and near long-term support w/ crowded short positioning. Odds favor a strong bounce in the interim but longer-term the supportive drivers of the USD bull have been taken down one-by-one and we're likely moving into a cyclical bear.
"This paradox is absolutely central to the working of all financial markets... The more bullish things are, the more bearish they are." ~ Percival's "The Way of the Dollar"
Markets are paradoxical & circular. Understanding its many circular relationships is crucial.... /1
2/ ...to groking its true nature. The price-sentiment relationship is one of these. Prices rise=sentiment follows=positioning adapts=criticality is reached = prices reverse = sentiment follows, ad infinum...
Every trend sows the seed for its end. Trend + reversion = sine waves
3/ Another critically important circular relationship is that between stocks & bonds.
No financial asset exists w/in a vacuum. The game of markets & the act of valuation is one of relative comparisons. Stocks and bonds compete for flows...
"I don’t believe in edge. I think it’s a fairy tale. The world is too competitive. Going back to AI, investing is where chess was in 1996... "~@GavinSBaker
This is a killer interview with Gavin on how to think about edge in investing. Some thoughts👇 /1
2/ At MO, we often write about how anything that can be quantified will be arbitraged by machines. A world of alt data, satellites giving coverage of consumer traffic, drones beaming infrared signal at oil-storage to gauge inventory, etc = The mrkt becoming hyper-efficient.
3/ This is why discretionary investors need to extend their analysis timeframe. Gavin says that "all alpha comes from insights. An insight is a kind of a differentiated long-term viewpoint about a stock. It's a differentiated view about the long-term state of the world."
THREAD: The market is like a magician. It pulls your attention to one hand while stealing your watch with the other. The biggest trends kick-off when no one’s looking. The most contested areas of the market — the stocks everyone is talking about — do nothing.
2/ The fact that our hive mind is instantly embedded into the market price inherently means that most large moves will surprise most participants. After all, if everyone was already expecting it, it would have already happened.
3/ To catch the magician in the act we need to contrast what everyone is focusing on with what's *actually* happening in the tape. We can do this by looking at the Hierarchy of Technicals macro-ops.com/the-hierarchy-… which allows us to build a coherent picture from mltple data points
Most traders make decisions w/out *effective* context. This leads to reactive emotion-driven actions which result in buying tops & selling bottoms.
Here’s what we can learn from a former Delta Force Commander on how to make better decisions & not get bucked by trends.Thread..1/
2/ In the final days of “Stress Phase” (the last test to gain entrance into Delta Force) Peter Blaber was 15hrs into a maneuver. He was tired, delirious, and lost in the mountains of VA when he was “forced” to run at full speed and jump off a cliff…
3/ Blaber, in his discombobulated state, thought he was being chased by an angry Black Bear. It was only after tumbling hundreds of feet (losing his map & flashlight) that he looked back up to the cliff’s edge, and realized it was just a pig.
1/ Lars Tvede writes in his book "Business Cycles: History, Theory, and Investment Reality" about a phenomenon he calls "The Principle of Bubble Rotation", which he explains as:
2/ Essentially, he's saying that "what outperformed in the last cycle will not outperform in the next" and gives three reasons for this "cycle-skip"...
3/ One is Psychological: Investors who've been burned buying into a bubble are unlikely to be eager buyers of those same assets in the next.
Skimming through some old notes from Mallaby's "More Money Than God" & love this bit view on investor psychology from Michael Marcus and the CC crew:
"People form opinions at their own pace and in their own way; the notion that new information could be instantly processed... /1
"was one of those ivory-tower assumptions that had little to do with reality. This gradual absorption of information by investors explained why markets moved in trends, as new developments were gradually digested. But market psychology was more subtle than that; /2
"there were times when investors' reactions accelerated. Human beings do not simply make forward-looking judgments about markets, the CC traders recognized; they react to recent experiences" -- That last bit is very key