LORD JUDGE (cont)
I expect negotiations to be tough—that is the whole point of them. I hope that our negotiators are being tough—that is what they are there for. That is a very far distant cry from bad faith😱
NO EVIDENCE of that has so far been shown to any of the committees 😱
...which examined these issues; indeed, apart from the most recent observation by the Minister before us today, there is no evidence. Therefore, we are dealing with a hypothetical situation, which is: “We may need these powers at some stage.” Maybe we will; I hope not...2/
If we do, it is perfectly open to the Govt to come back to us, to Parliament, to put before us emergency legislation & for both Houses to sit as long & as late as necessary to examine the proposals, and, if they are satisfactory, to endorse them. 3/
...you do not have to be a lawyer to understand the #RuleofLaw, & you certainly do not have to be a lawyer to understand when you are giving powers away. That is what the Bill will do. You do not have to be a lawyer to understand the reputational damage to the United Kingdom💔 4/
LORD JUDGE:
We cannot resile from the fact that we are breaking the law if the Bill is enacted.That is what the Govt say.
That is why, while I quite understand the Minister’s anxiety about the future & I share his concern about it😱😢, I will seek the views of this House👏 END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
LORD JUDGE:The debate has reinforced my anxiety about the Bill!
If enacted, we'll be giving the Executive the most EXTRAORDINARILY WIDE POWERS, & until the debate I'd not fully appreciated the DANGERS to the union of giving the Executive in London effectively uncontrolled power😱
...over the way in which the internal market will work.
I notice that the Minister has not resiled from the proposition....that the Bill, if enacted, would not break international law or break the law. That it would not break the law seems a crucial element in this...2/
The fact of the matter is that the law wd be broken. The Minister in the other place said so; the Treasury Solicitor resigned; & the noble & learned Lord, Lord Keen, resigned. There can be no getting away from it & to be fair, the Minister in our House has not sought to do so. 3/
LORD FALCONER 🔥🔥ON FIRE!🔥🔥@houseoflords
I have no doubt this comes from No. 10!
It is the product of a PM clueless about detail, so lacking in grip he cannot or will not see beyond looking tough toward the EU, who is flailing around trying to deliver on the false promises..1/
he made to NI businesses that there'd be no additional checks btwn NI & GB, & to hard-line Brexiteers that he'd do something about the NIP.
He is a PM with advisers out of control, looking for political STUNTS to reinforce the insurgent nature of #Brexit, happy to sacrifice...2/
...the #RuleofLaw in the hope of a good culture wars row with #remainers & some screeching headlines!🔥
& oblivious to the consequences to the standing of the UK, its long-term relationship with the EU countries & the security & safety of those who live in Ireland...3/
Lord Judge explains difference btwn Rule BY Laws and Rule OF Law! Gives eg of Apartheid! #RuleofLaw is "our safest shield against AUTHORITARIANISM"
Phrase used in 1610 to tell an overweeing King seeking to exercise over much power. It is a phrase we must use for overweeing Exec!
Baroness Haytor says PM has managed to have angered:
Lawyers
Devolved Authorities
The EU
His own backbenchers
The Church
& majority of @UKHouseofLords
She reminds PM of @BarackObama's words to Trump! to remember that they are just "temporary occupants of this office". "That makes us guardians of those democratic institutions and traditions — like #Ruleoflaw, separation of powers, equal protection and civil liberties...
Regardless of the push and pull of daily politics, it's up to us to leave those instruments of our democracy at least as strong as we found them."
WOW👍 Baroness Haytor #InternalMarketBill debate! ❤
In 1610 phrase #RuleofaLaw used to tell an overwening King seeking to exercise excessive power. Overweening Exec!
Not alone in finding it offensive! Being asked to allow Exec ti break the law DELIBERATELY & KNOWINGLY!
NEVER YET found an occasion where Parliament has been invited to agree that a minister should be entitled to break the law!
Part 5 - in entirety, not just Clause 47 which is pernicious!!
"A party may NOT invoke the provisions of internal law as justification for its failure to perform a treaty"
"existence of the power to override a number of the UK's obligations may itself constitute a violation of international law"
@BinghamCentre on #InternalMarketBill
▪The Bill DELIBERATELY breaches #InternationalLaw
▪Passing the Bill will put UK in IMMEDIATE breach of WA
▪Introducing such a Bill is a breach of the Ministerial Code