A key graph from Swedish Public Health Authorities press conference today that many may have missed the implications of. The same one was used back in March.

Remember "flatten the curve"? It's back. But there's something important to understand about this graph.
The areas in the graph (orange and blue in this case) represents the total number of people requiring hospitalization. This is a relative stable percentage of the total population, so you could draw a smaller, bigger, graph to reflect infections, with much the same shapes.
In the first instance (orange), hospitalisation needs increase rapidly, and then begins to decline. This reflects community infection spreading rapidly, and then declining.
In the blue curve, *the same number of people are hospitalised* - and thus the same number infected, but they're just spread out over time.

So why do the numbers decline? What causes a steady decline in hospitalisations, and thus deaths, like this?
The answer is that, from epidemiological modelling, the number of "susceptible" has declined. There's fewer people who can get infected. Why? Because they've already been infected and are assumed immune. They won't get infected again. (An assumption we now know to be false)
The number of new daily infections decreases until the virus can't find anyone left to infect, since enough people are immune. You may have heard a term describe this. It's called "herd immunity".
This is what Tegnell talks about when he says the strategy isn't "herd immunity", it just happens anyway, a side effect.

The *only* strategy here is to slow down the rate of infection so that healthcare isn't overwhelmed.

That's it, that's the Swedish strategy.
**But the same number of people get infected**, and around 1 in 200 die, and millions get ill, many with long term side effects That's the other side effect he doesn't talk about. It's what we've learned in the 7 months since March.
The fact Folkhälsomyndigheten shows this graph again shows they *still* believe this virus cannot be stopped until we reach "natural" herd immunity. Just slow down infections, protect healthcare.
Look at it again. That blue graph represents 60-70% of Sweden getting infected by sars-cov-2. That's what the Swedish Public Health Authority showed in March, and what they showed again today. It's what they *expect* to happen.
That, in essence, means Tegnell and the Swedish Public Health Authority are *still* operating under a strategy that results in 60-70% of the community getting ill. 0.6% of them dying, and as many as 10-15% suffering the result of #longcovid.
Experience in many other countries, including our close neighbours like Norway, shows this virus *can* be suppressed successfully with brief, sharp national lockdowns, and then regional responses to control outbreaks.
@tomaspueyo famously dubbed this The Hammer and the Dance way back in March. Back then it was theory, a proposal. Today it's been proven to work, and it saves lives.

medium.com/@tomaspueyo/co…
Heck, the **Swedish** experience shows it works! Tegnell and his colleagues constantly expressed surprise when serology testing kept finding that not as many people had been infected as they expected.

Emergency healthcare such as tent hospitals were constructed and never used.
Why? Because the interventions Sweden put in place, along with people's own natural behaviour change, dramatically slowed the spread of the virus - albeit more slowly than our neighbours.
Even here in Sweden, with "virtual lockdown" as Tegnell recently called it, the virus proved amenable to the NPI. Then summer came and we discovered that, yes, this virus is seasonal. It doesn't like summers, it doesn't like outdoors. We could have used a hammer and crushed it
But we didn't then. We still can now, it's not too late. But Folkhälsomyndigheten doesn't want to. This is their strategy - look at again -
It's herd immunity. They showed us it in March, and despite 7 months of new knowledge, and the experience of countries around the world, and even Sweden, they showed it again.
Protect healthcare, slow it down, but let the virus spread. Let people get it. Let people get #longcovid. Let children get MIS-C. Let people die.

That's the strategy, It's in their actions, it's in their modelling. Look at what people DO, not what they SAY.

/end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Steadson 🇦🇺🇸🇪🇪🇺🌍

David Steadson 🇦🇺🇸🇪🇪🇺🌍 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DavidSteadson

29 Oct
3 254 new #coronasweden cases announced today, taking Tuesday's total to 2416 and yesterday to 2820. The last data data is nearly always updated next day by approximately 25%, so we've almost certainly blown way past 3000 new cases in one day.
7 new deaths also registered, bringing the total to 5934. Despite nearly 200 deaths being removed through "adjustments" in recent weeks, this is a new high.

Oldest change +1 to October 10. Number of deaths with an unregistered data is now up to 9.
Swedish Palliative Care registry reports 122 Covid deaths for October, compared to FHMs total of 72. That's an increase of *14* since Tuesday.
Read 10 tweets
29 Oct
@luca_forconi asked me why data from Folkhälsomyndigheten on ICU use in Sweden doesn't match what SIR - the Swedish Intensive Care Registry is reporting. I hadn't previously looked, and he's right!
This is a graph of this month, comparing FHM reports of "# of Intensive Care per day" compared to SIRs "# of individuals admitted with Covid-19" as of the latest data from both.
Some of it seems to be reporting lag, but SIR is reporting 101 individuals, FHM is reporting just 75. I checked the FHM description of data sources and differences, they don't seem to mention ICU admissions, just deaths.

socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/1…
Read 4 tweets
27 Oct
As I reported likely last week, the #covid19 Sweden death toll today *decreased* by 15. In reality, there were (at least) 16 deaths added, all since October 12, and at least 31 deaths removed, from May to August.

Small numbers, but mortality appears to be slowly creeping since the end of September, with knowledge there remains a lag of about 2 weeks.
Swedish Palliative Registry now reports 108 deaths for October, an increase of 17 since Friday. (FHM reports 59)
Read 11 tweets
4 Oct
For those who think a Swedish "second wave" is only about how many people are hospitalized or dying. This is till happening to me, now almost 7 MONTHS after I first fell ill. Left is from Sept 22, right is right now.

Most of the time is good now, >97 but this is still regular
That's my blood oxygen levels dipping under 94, the "safe" level. At my worst it went in to the 80s. I bought the pulseoximeter a couple of years ago out of curiosity, prior to Covid I had never seen it drop below 97. I bought a second to confirm it was correct. It is.
ZERO health issues before covid apart from some mild allergies. I was very fit, resting pulse rate in the mid to low 50s, training 5-7 times a week and training others

Sweden is now having thousands of people a week testing postive for covid. How many are going to be #longcovid?
Read 18 tweets
1 Oct
I only recently discovered the Swedish Palliative Care Registry and have started to compare it's data to Folkhälsomyndigheten, and there are some significant differences.

data.palliativregistret.se/utdata/report/…
FHM unfortunately doesn't provide breakdown of deaths by age by date, but they do provide cumulative totals by 10 year age groups, eg 70-79 yr olds.

The palliative care registry does the same, but unfortunately using a different range, eg 75-85 🤨
If I take FHM's reports of total deaths from 60yrs and up reported today, and subtract the same figure reported on Sept 1, I get 72 deaths so far registered in September

If I take the 65 and up age group from SPR (a smaller group) I get 103 deaths.

That's a big difference. Image
Read 5 tweets
26 Sep
Irish interview with Johan Giesecke. Interviewer @boucherhayes seems to have a solid grasp of epidemiological confounders, and Giesecke denies giving advice (paid?) and admits he spoke without any research into local conditions.

rte.ie/radio/utils/sh…
Gisecke's testimony, where he clearly *is* giving advice

irishtimes.com/news/health/sw…
1. wait a year to compare countries

2. soft lockdown like Sweden can be effective

3. don't build a strategy based on a vaccine

4. you should allow controlled spread in groups under 70
>
5. keep your schools open

6. poor & marginalised get hurt most by disease

7. covid isn't that mysterious.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!