I'll keep this brief, I think Magnachip $MX, for good reason, could finally be starting to rerate.
It's the RT below: foundry divestment - now it has hit the balance sheet. Today it's 0.6x EV/FY20 revenues and by 2023 their aim is 8% FCF. This is way too cheap.
You naturally assume they're a melting ice cube; they're not, they grow. They're reliably prolific in getting design wins and have plenty to look forward to, like the below.
It's still a cyclical end-market business but less so with the boom and bust of foundry gone. Now with the cash in the filings, it can screen cheap. The whole idea is simple: if they hit or even approach the targets, an IP led company doesn't trade at a fraction of revenues.
And next, with almost indecent haste, an activist - Engaged Capital - now appears on the register for $MX
A while ago @subset_member explained his thinking that the new console cycle should drive a spike in OLED TV sales - was a very great call. It's not a clear read-through for $MX given their exposure to power > drivers in TV but certainly an interesting incremental data point
So far Magnachip $MX has been re-rating the wrong way
Their main business is making DDIC controllers for OLED screens. What are they?
A computer / phone asks for a certain image displayed on a screen. The DDIC sits between the two. It tells the screen how to make the image: this pixel like this, turn that one off, dim that etc
So the more the frame rate or the more the resolution - ie how quickly the picture updates and how good it needs to be - the bigger the workload on a DDIC.
New gen games on TV screens and phones, 5G driving mobile gaming and movie consumption - it's all only going one way
First: 120Hz for some of the iPhones - an increased frequency so the screen updates more quickly, to my point about things only going one way.
Above 120Hz is where MX start to come into their own
Second: the last call. Does this mean MX are in Samsung? Very probably. Does this mean MX will be putting the DDIC controllers into iPhones? I don't know.
MX recently sold their foundry, it got them out of a super-cyclical area and brought them plenty of cash
But the left-over work they're finishing up there is screwing with the optics on the financials: it's (literally) zero-margin and brings down the overall gross margin
That goes away, the numbers look better.
Green box shows how the op income is suffering from all this
Then there were two genuine exceptionals: they had to dump a load of products for Huawei when the ban came in and then a power cut fried a bunch of products they were making.
What does this year look like?
Midpoint of guide for Q4 puts revs at $497M all in w/gross margin coming up from Q3's $23% into a range of $25-27% - won't save FY20 but better
Ex-foundry it's ~$460M
With a cap of $481M, cash of $236M, so EV of $245 or 0.5x non-foundry 2020 revs
Here's what they want to do now foundry is on its way out
I think it could turn out stronger but let's assume that $460 grows 7% per year into 2023 and reaches $560M
Suppose that happens and they do achieve their targets and exit 2023 with DD growth at 10% adjusted op margins and +8% FCF
What's do you pay for that?
At $45M a FCF yield of 18% would seem too cheap
Calling it 10% would put MX on an EV/Sales ratio of 0.8x or about 22% a year from here to there for that to happen - doesn't seem unreasonable.
Then there's the optionality from that cash: maybe they divi it out, maybe they buy
Sure it's no SPAC rocket but for the industry trends, the Samsung (..and AAPL?) exposure, the numbers cleaning up by themselves, optionalities in execution and M&A - it's decent here
And you never know, maybe their activist gets them bought out instead
T9M figures last 4 years. Yes it's a bit stagnant in the numbers and costs up / profit down a little etc but the COGs numbers are roughly consistent. You could imagine a jump in revenues flowing through quite well.
2018 was Oprah
Fair to guess lots of New Year gym sign-ups are postponed or never happen and more NY lose weight / get fit resolutions than usual find their way here instead?
Cashflow behaves roughly the same. More SBC, bit more capex.
Very hairy: this company was going down the toilet even before covid; it's now a wreck - and even better, it's enormously exposed to Chinese solar. BK isn't off the cards and the upside may not even be that great. Chart is back to Jan 2017. Singulus from Germany #SNG.DE
It's a German maker of high end capital goods for solar, semi and life sciences: glass and wafer deposition / polishing, that kind of area.
Revenues in 9M20 YTD a third of an already bad 2019. Goes from breakeven to -€20M loss and even achieves a negative gross margin, quite the achievement.
There's a thread by @Mitch198509 about $NFIN, a SPAC for a trade finance platform. It uses blockchain and at that point in the presentation I stopped. Forget it, of course.
But I read it again, then the proxy, then I put it in front of a trade finance lawyer. Could be something
Those numbers are projections I pulled from the proxy. Earn-outs on either share price X by certain dates, or 90% of the above EBITDA being achieved.
Doesn't need to get a $NCNO to $MKTX multiple to work from here but we can dream.
HY20: Revenue $24M / Ebitda: $17M / Net $14M
What they do in 1 tweet:
Platform for trade finance. TF is slow, paper-intensive, expensive and inaccessible for little fish: company says $1.5T unmet need with 60% of requests refused. Triterras (the biz NFIN is SPACing) brings KYC pre-qualified borrowers and lenders together.
Satisfyingly, 's 1996 annual report looks like the intro credits to Saved By The Bell.
It's also how far back I had to go to find when their R&D spending matches what 's is today: 24 years
$1,547 was AMD's 2019 R&D expense. I'm looking at this because I've made the mistake both here - in ignoring AMD at $5 - and elsewhere, of assuming that a tech incumbent's huge advantage in spend should necessarily provide some kind of moat.
Intel spends in a year what it takes AMD almost a decade to afford